VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_16-vv-01213
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_16-vv-01213
Petitioner: S.I.
Filed: 2016-09-27
Decided: 2017-05-12
Vaccine: MMR
Vaccination date: 2015-06-23
Condition: Idiopathic Thrombocytopenia Purpura (ITP)
Outcome: compensated
Award amount USD: 

AI-assisted case summary:
On September 27, 2016, Rebecca and Odin Ilnicky, as parents and natural guardians of their minor child S.I., filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. They alleged that S.I. developed Idiopathic Thrombocytopenia Purpura (ITP) as a result of receiving a measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine on June 23, 2015. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit. On January 17, 2017, the respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, filed a Rule 4(c) Report conceding that petitioners were entitled to compensation. The respondent stated that S.I.'s alleged injury was consistent with ITP as defined in the Vaccine Injury Table, that S.I.'s ITP manifested between seven and thirty days following the MMR vaccination, and that petitioners met the statutory requirement to show six months of residuals from the ITP. The respondent did not identify any other causes for S.I.'s ITP. Based on the respondent's concession and the evidence of record, Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey issued a ruling on entitlement on January 18, 2017, finding petitioners entitled to compensation. Subsequently, on May 12, 2017, the respondent filed a proffer on the award of compensation. The parties recommended that compensation be made through future annuity payments. The decision did not state the annuity purchase price. The award directed the purchase of an annuity contract for S.I., to be paid to a life insurance company. The annuity contract was to provide three certain future lump-sum payments to S.I.: $49,483.78 on January 19, 2029; $54,561.55 on January 19, 2032; and $62,204.39 on January 19, 2036. The proffer indicated that if S.I. died before any of these payments were made, the remaining payments would be made to his estate, provided written notice was given to the respondent and the life insurance company within twenty days of S.I.'s death. This amount represented all elements of compensation available under the Act. Petitioners were represented by Jeffrey S. Pop, and respondent was represented by Kathryn A. Robinette. Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey issued the damages decision on May 12, 2017.

Theory of causation field:
Petitioners Rebecca and Odin Ilnicky filed on behalf of minor S.I., alleging ITP following an MMR vaccination on June 23, 2015. The respondent conceded entitlement, agreeing that S.I.'s ITP was consistent with the Vaccine Injury Table, manifested within the required timeframe (7-30 days post-vaccination), and that S.I. suffered the requisite six months of residuals. No other causes were identified by the respondent. Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey issued an entitlement ruling on January 18, 2017. A damages decision was issued on May 12, 2017, awarding compensation via an annuity contract. The award includes three certain future lump-sum payments: $49,483.78 on January 19, 2029; $54,561.55 on January 19, 2032; and $62,204.39 on January 19, 2036. If S.I. predeceases these payment dates, the amounts are payable to his estate. The public decision does not state the annuity purchase price or provide a present lump-sum award total. Petitioners' attorney was Jeffrey S. Pop; respondent's attorney was Kathryn A. Robinette. Chief Special Master Dorsey presided over both decisions.

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_16-vv-01213-0
Date issued/filed: 2017-06-15
Pages: 2
Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 01/18/2017) regarding 13 Ruling on Entitlement ( Signed by Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey.)(mpj) Copy to parties.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:16-vv-01213-UNJ Document 27 Filed 06/15/17 Page 1 of 2
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 16-1213V
Filed: January 18, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
REBECCA ILNICKY, as mother and *
natural guardian of minor, S.I., and, *
ODIN ILNICKY, as father and *
natural guardian of minor S.I., *
* Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
Petitioner, * Mumps, Measles, and Rubella (“MMR”)
v. * Vaccine; Idiopathic Thrombocytopenia
* Purpura (“ITP”); Table Injury; Special
SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Processing Unit; (“SPU”)
AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
*
Respondent. *
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Jeffrey S. Pop, Attorney at Law, Beverly Hills, CA, for petitioner.
Kathryn A. Robinette, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1
Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
On September 27, 2016, Rebecca Ilnicky and Odin Ilnicky, parents of minor, S.I.
(collectively, “petitioners”), filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine
Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”).
Petitioners allege that S.I. developed Idiopathic Thrombocytopenia Purpura (“ITP”) as a
result of an MMR vaccine administered on June 23, 2015. Petition at 1. The case was
assigned to the Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) of the Office of Special Masters.
On January 17, 2017, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) Report conceding that
petitioners are entitled to compensation in this case. Rule 4(c) Rep. at 1. Specifically,
respondent “believes that S.I.’s alleged injury is consistent with ITP as defined in the
1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).

Case 1:16-vv-01213-UNJ Document 27 Filed 06/15/17 Page 2 of 2
Vaccine Injury Table.” Id. at 4. “Petitioners are entitled to a presumption of causation,
as S.I.’s ITP manifested between seven and thirty days following is MMR vaccination.”
Id. Respondent “did not identify any other causes for S.I.’s ITP and, based upon the
medical records [submitted], petitioners meet the statutory requirement to show that S.I.
suffered the requisite six months of residuals from his ITP.” Id. Respondent concludes
that “based on the record as it now stands, petitioners have satisfied all legal
prerequisites for compensation under the Act.” Id.
In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence of record, the
undersigned finds that petitioners are entitled to compensation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Nora Beth Dorsey
Nora Beth Dorsey
Chief Special Master
2

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_16-vv-01213-1
Date issued/filed: 2017-12-13
Pages: 5
Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 5/12/2017) regarding 23 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer ( Signed by Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey.)(mpj) Copy to parties.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:16-vv-01213-UNJ Document 34 Filed 12/13/17 Page 1 of 5
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 16-1213V
Filed: May 12, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
REBECCA ILNICKY, as mother and *
natural guardian of minor, S.I., and, *
ODIN ILNICKY, as father and *
natural guardian of minor S.I., *
* Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
Petitioners, * Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (“MMR”)
* Vaccine; Idiopathic Thrombocytopenia
v. * Purpura (“ITP”); Table Injury;
* Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)
SECRETARY OF HEALTH *
AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
*
Respondent. *
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Jeffrey S. Pop, Attorney at Law, Beverly Hills, CA, for petitioner.
Kathryn A. Robinette, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
On September 27, 2016, Rebecca Ilnicky and Odin Ilnicky, parents of minor, S.I.
(collectively, “petitioners”), filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine
Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”).
Petitioners allege that S.I. developed Idiopathic Thrombocytopenia Purpura (“ITP”) as a
result of a measles, mumps, and rubella (“MMR”) vaccine administered on June 23,
2015. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office
of Special Masters.
1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).

Case 1:16-vv-01213-UNJ Document 34 Filed 12/13/17 Page 2 of 5
On January 18, 2017, the undersigned issued a ruling on entitlement, finding
petitioners entitled to compensation. (ECF No. 13). On May 12, 2017, respondent filed
a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating petitioners should be awarded
an amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract,3 paid to the life insurance
company from which the annuity will be purchased,4 subject to the conditions described
in the Proffer that will provide the following payments to S.I.:
1. $49,483.78 payable in a certain lump sum on 01/19/2029.
2. $54,561.55 payable in a certain lump sum on 01/19/2032.
3. $62,204.39 payable in a certain lump sum on 01/19/2036.
Proffer at 2. The Proffer further indicates, if S.I. predeceases any of these payments,
said payments shall be made to his estate upon receiving written notice, provided within
20 days, to respondent and the life insurance company from which the annuity will be
purchased. Id. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioners agree with the
proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that
petitioners are entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards
petitioners an amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract, to provide the
payments to S.I described above and in the Proffer, paid to the life insurance
company from which the annuity contract will be purchased. This amount
represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 15(a).
The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
decision.5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Nora Beth Dorsey
Nora Beth Dorsey
Chief Special Master
3 The Proffer indicates that respondent may, in his discretion, purchase multiple annuity contracts from
multiple life insurance companies. Proffer at 2 n.2.
4 Any life insurance company from which an annuity contract is purchased must met the requirements set
forth in the Proffer. See Proffer at 2 n.3.
5 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2

Case 1:16-vv-01213-UNJ Document 34 Filed 12/13/17 Page 3 of 5
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
__________________________________________
)
REBECCA ILNICKY, as mother and natural )
guardian of minor, S.I., and ODIN ILNICKY, )
as father and natural guardian of minor, S.I., )
) No. 16-1213V
Petitioners, ) Chief Special Master Dorsey
) ECF
v. )
)
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND )
HUMAN SERVICES, )
)
Respondent. )
__________________________________________)
RESPONDENT’S PROFFER OF DAMAGES
I. Items of Compensation and Form of the Award
Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers, and the parties recommend, that
compensation be made through future annuity payments as described below, and request that the
Chief Special Master's decision and the Court's judgment award the following:1
1 Should S.I. die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In
particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and
suffering.

Case 1:16-vv-01213-UNJ Document 34 Filed 12/13/17 Page 4 of 5
A. Annuity
An amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract,2 paid to the life insurance
company3 from which the annuity will be purchased,4 subject to the conditions described below,
that will provide payments to S.I. as set forth below:
1. $49,483.78 payable in a certain lump sum on 01/19/2029.
2. $54,561.55 payable in a certain lump sum on 01/19/2032.
3. $62,204.39 payable in a certain lump sum on 01/19/2036.
Should S.I. predecease any of the certain payments set forth above, said payments shall be made
to his estate. Written notice to the Secretary of Health and Human Services and to the Life
Insurance Company shall be provided within twenty (20) days of S.I.’s death.
This amount represents all elements of compensation to which S.I. would be entitled
under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioners agree.5
II. Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment
A. An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described
above in section I. A.
2 In respondent’s discretion, respondent may purchase one or more annuity contracts from one or more life
insurance companies.
3 The Life Insurance Company must have a minimum of $250,000,000 capital and surplus, exclusive of any
mandatory security valuation reserve. The Life Insurance Company must have one of the following ratings from
two of the following rating organizations:
a. A.M. Best Company: A++, A+, A+g, A+p, A+r, or A+s;
b. Moody's Investor Service Claims Paying Rating: Aa3, Aa2, Aa1, or Aaa;
c. Standard and Poor's Corporation Insurer Claims-Paying Ability Rating: AA-, AA, AA+, or
AAA;
d. Fitch Credit Rating Company, Insurance Company Claims Paying Ability Rating: AA-, AA,
AA+, or AAA.
4 Petitioners authorize the disclosure of certain documents filed by the petitioners in this case consistent with the
Privacy Act and the routine uses described in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program System of
Records, No. 09-15-0056.
5 At the time payment is received, S.I. will be an adult, and thus guardianship is not required.
2

Case 1:16-vv-01213-UNJ Document 34 Filed 12/13/17 Page 5 of 5
Respectfully submitted,
CHAD A. READLER
Acting Assistant Attorney General
C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
Acting Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
CATHARINE E. REEVES
Deputy Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
ALEXIS BABCOCK
Assistant Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
/s/KATHRYN A. ROBINETTE
KATHRYN A. ROBINETTE
Trial Attorney
Torts Branch, Civil Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 146
Benjamin Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
Tel: (202) 616-3661
Dated: May 12, 2017
3