Greg Averitt v. HHS - Influenza, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (2018)
Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]
Greg Averitt filed a petition for compensation on August 4, 2016, alleging that the influenza vaccine he received on October 14, 2014, caused him to suffer from acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM). He further alleged that the residual effects of this injury lasted for more than six months.
The influenza vaccine is listed on the Vaccine Injury Table. The respondent denied that the vaccine caused or significantly aggravated petitioner's alleged injury or any other injury, and denied that petitioner's current disabilities were the result of a vaccine-related injury.
Despite these denials, the parties reached a joint stipulation. Special Master Christian J.
Moran adopted the stipulation as the decision of the Court. The stipulation awarded Greg Averitt a lump sum payment of $410,000.00, payable by check to the petitioner, as compensation for all damages available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).
The decision was filed on March 30, 2018, and entered on September 6, 2018. Petitioner was represented by Isaiah R.
Kalinowski of Maglio Christopher and Toale, PA, and respondent was represented by Mallori B. Openchowksi of the United States Department of Justice.
The public decision does not describe the onset of symptoms, specific clinical details, diagnostic tests, treatments, or expert witnesses. The decision is unpublished, with parties having 14 days to propose redactions.
Theory of causation
Petitioner Greg Averitt alleged that an influenza vaccine received on October 14, 2014, caused acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), with residual effects lasting more than six months. The vaccine is listed on the Vaccine Injury Table. Respondent denied causation. The parties reached a stipulation, which was adopted by Special Master Christian J. Moran. The stipulation resulted in an award of $410,000.00 as compensation for all damages. The decision date was September 6, 2018. Petitioner's counsel was Isaiah R. Kalinowski, and respondent's counsel was Mallori B. Openchowksi. The public decision does not detail the specific mechanism of injury, expert testimony, or the factual basis for the stipulation beyond the parties' agreement.
Source PDFs
USCOURTS-cofc-1_16-vv-00938