VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_16-vv-00778
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_16-vv-00778
Petitioner: Romeo Raabe
Filed: 2017-01-13
Decided: 2017-12-08
Vaccine: influenza
Vaccination date: 2015-10-06
Condition: shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA)
Outcome: compensated
Award amount USD: 80000

AI-assisted case summary:
Romeo Raabe, an adult, filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on June 30, 2016. He alleged that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) following an influenza vaccination he received on October 6, 2015. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit. On January 12, 2017, the respondent filed a Rule 4(c) report conceding that Mr. Raabe was entitled to compensation. The respondent determined that the alleged injury was consistent with SIRVA caused by the influenza vaccination, that no other cause for the injury was identified, that Mr. Raabe suffered residual effects for more than six months, and that all legal prerequisites for compensation were met. Based on the respondent's concession and the evidence, Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey issued a ruling on entitlement on January 13, 2017, finding Mr. Raabe entitled to compensation. Subsequently, on April 14, 2017, the respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation, proposing an award of $80,000.00, stating that the petitioner agreed with this amount. Chief Special Master Dorsey reviewed the proffer and the record, and on December 8, 2017, issued a decision awarding Romeo Raabe a lump sum payment of $80,000.00, payable by check to him, as compensation for all damages. Petitioner was represented by Paul Brazil of Muller Brazil, LLP, and respondent was represented by Debra Filteau Begley of the U.S. Department of Justice.

Theory of causation field:
Petitioner Romeo Raabe received an influenza vaccination on October 6, 2015. He alleged a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA). The respondent conceded that the injury was consistent with SIRVA caused by the vaccination, that no other cause was identified, and that petitioner suffered residual effects for more than six months, satisfying all legal prerequisites for compensation. The theory of causation was based on the "Table" for SIRVA. Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey issued a ruling on entitlement on January 13, 2017. On April 14, 2017, respondent proffered an award of $80,000.00, which petitioner accepted. Chief Special Master Dorsey awarded Romeo Raabe a lump sum of $80,000.00 on December 8, 2017. Petitioner's counsel was Paul Brazil, and respondent's counsel was Debra Filteau Begley.

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_16-vv-00778-0
Date issued/filed: 2017-06-14
Pages: 2
Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 01/13/2017) regarding 13 Ruling on Entitlement ( Signed by Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey.)(mpj) Copy to parties. Modified on 6/19/2017 to correct docket text(kh).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:16-vv-00778-UNJ Document 28 Filed 06/14/17 Page 1 of 2
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 16-778V
Filed: January 13, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
ROMEO RAABE, *
*
Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
v. * Influenza;
* Shoulder Injury; SIRVA;
SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)
AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
*
Respondent. *
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Paul Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.
Debra Filteau Begley, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1
Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
On June 30, 2016, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine
Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury following his October 6, 2015
influenza vaccination. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing
Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On January 12, 2017, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) report in which she
concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule
4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent “has determined that the alleged injury is
consistent with SIRVA [i.e. shoulder injury related to vaccine administration] that was
caused by the administration of petitioner’s influenza vaccination”. Id. at 4. Respondent
further agrees that no other cause for petitioner’s injury was identified, that petitioner
1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).

Case 1:16-vv-00778-UNJ Document 28 Filed 06/14/17 Page 2 of 2
suffered residual effects of his injury for more than six months, and that petitioner has
satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Vaccine Act. Id.
In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, the
undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Nora Beth Dorsey
Nora Beth Dorsey
Chief Special Master
2

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_16-vv-00778-1
Date issued/filed: 2017-12-08
Pages: 4
Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 04/18/2017) regarding 21 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer ( Signed by Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey.)(mpj) Copy to parties.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:16-vv-00778-UNJ Document 31 Filed 12/08/17 Page 1 of 4
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 16-778V
Filed: April 18, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
ROMEO RAABE, *
*
Petitioner, * Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
v. * Influenza;
* Shoulder Injury; SIRVA;
SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)
AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
*
Respondent. *
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.
Debra A. Filteau Begley, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
On June 30, 2016, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine
Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury following his October 6, 2015
influenza vaccination. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing
Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On January 13, 2017, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner
entitled to compensation for a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration
(“SIRVA”). On April 14, 2017, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation
(“Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be awarded $80,000.00. Proffer at 1. In the
Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Based
1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).

Case 1:16-vv-00778-UNJ Document 31 Filed 12/08/17 Page 2 of 4
on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as
stated in the Proffer.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards
petitioner a lump sum payment of $80,000.00 in the form of a check payable to
petitioner, Romeo Raabe. This amount represents compensation for all damages that
would be available under § 300aa-15(a).
The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
decision.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Nora Beth Dorsey
Nora Beth Dorsey
Chief Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2

Case 1:16-vv-00778-UNJ Document 31 Filed 12/08/17 Page 3 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
*************************************
ROMEO RAABE, *
*
Petitioner, * No. 16-778V
* CHIEF SPECIAL MASTER
v. * NORA BETH DORSEY
*
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND *
HUMAN SERVICES, *
*
Respondent. *
*************************************
RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
I. Items of Compensation
The Court issued a Ruling on Entitlement on January 13, 2017. Based upon the evidence
of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $80,000.00, which represents all
elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).1
Petitioner agrees.
II. Form of the Award
Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a
lump sum payment of $80,000.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. Petitioner agrees.
Respectfully submitted,
CHAD A. READLER
Acting Assistant Attorney General
1 Should petitioner die prior to the entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move
the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future
medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering.

Case 1:16-vv-00778-UNJ Document 31 Filed 12/08/17 Page 4 of 4
C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
Acting Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
CATHARINE E. REEVES
Deputy Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
MICHAEL P. MILMOE
Senior Trial Counsel
Torts Branch, Civil Division
/s/ DEBRA A. FILTEAU BEGLEY
DEBRA A. FILTEAU BEGLEY
Trial Attorney
Torts Branch, Civil Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 146
Benjamin Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
Phone: (202) 616-4181
Dated: April 14, 2017
2