VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_16-vv-00565 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_16-vv-00565 Petitioner: HUNTER HORSEY, on behalf of G.H., a minor child Filed: 2016-10-07 Decided: 2016-11-17 Vaccine: Vaccination date: Condition: Outcome: dismissed Award amount USD: AI-assisted case summary: Hunter Horsey, acting on behalf of a minor child identified as G.H., filed a petition for vaccine injury compensation on October 7, 2016. The specific vaccine, alleged injury, and vaccination date were not detailed in this procedural order. On November 6, 2016, the petitioner filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a), Special Master Corcoran ordered the case concluded without judgment. No compensation was awarded, and the case was dismissed. Theory of causation field: unclear Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_16-vv-00565-0 Date issued/filed: 2016-11-17 Pages: 1 Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 10/07/2016) Regarding 9 Order Concluding Proceedings (Signed by Special Master Brian H. Corcoran). (sb) Copy to parties. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:16-vv-00565-UNJ Document 10 Filed 11/17/16 Page 1 of 1 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 16-565V * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * HUNTER HORSEY, on behalf of * G.H., a minor child, * Special Master Corcoran * Petitioner, * v. * Filed: October 7, 2016 * SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Rule 21(a); No Judgment; Order * Concluding Proceedings. Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1 On October 6, 2016, Petitioner filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal in the above- captioned case, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a). Accordingly, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a)(3), the above-captioned case is hereby ordered to be concluded. The Clerk of the Court is hereby instructed that a judgment shall not enter in the instant case pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Special Master 1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for my actions in this case, I will post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 (2012). As provided by 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B), however, the parties may object to the published decision’s inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has fourteen days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole decision will be available to the public. Id.