VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_16-vv-00313
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_16-vv-00313
Petitioner: Paula Absolon
Filed: 2017-06-01
Decided: 2018-05-08
Vaccine: influenza
Vaccination date: 2014-09-22
Condition: shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA)
Outcome: compensated
Award amount USD: 60000

AI-assisted case summary:
Paula Absolon filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on March 10, 2016. She alleged that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) and an injury to her cervical spine following an influenza vaccination on September 22, 2014. The petition stated that Ms. Absolon experienced residual effects of her injury for more than six months and that there had been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages. The respondent denied that the flu vaccine caused her alleged cervical spine injury or any other injury or condition besides SIRVA. The parties filed a joint stipulation on June 1, 2017. In this stipulation, they agreed that Ms. Absolon sustained a SIRVA and experienced residual effects for more than six months, and that there was no preponderance of evidence demonstrating that the SIRVA was due to a factor unrelated to the vaccination. Based on this stipulation, Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey adopted the terms of the stipulation as the decision of the court. Ms. Absolon was awarded a lump sum of $60,000.00, payable to her, as compensation for all items of damages available under the Vaccine Act. The decision was issued on May 8, 2018. Petitioner was represented by John Robert Howie, Jr. of Howie Law, PC, and respondent was represented by Gabrielle Manganiello Fielding of the U.S. Department of Justice.

Theory of causation field:
Petitioner Paula Absolon alleged a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) and a cervical spine injury following an influenza vaccination on September 22, 2014. The parties stipulated that petitioner sustained a SIRVA with residual effects for more than six months and that there was no evidence of an unrelated cause. Respondent denied causation for the cervical spine injury or any condition other than SIRVA. The case was resolved via joint stipulation. The Special Master awarded $60,000.00 as compensation for all damages. The theory of causation for SIRVA is covered under the Vaccine Injury Table. No specific medical experts or detailed clinical information regarding onset, symptoms, tests, or treatments were described in the public decision. The decision was issued by Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey on May 8, 2018. Petitioner's counsel was John Robert Howie, Jr., and respondent's counsel was Gabrielle Manganiello Fielding.

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_16-vv-00313-1
Date issued/filed: 2018-05-08
Pages: 7
Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 06/01/2017) regarding 43 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer ( Signed by Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey.)(mpj) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:16-vv-00313-UNJ Document 53 Filed 05/08/18 Page 1 of 7
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 16-313V
Filed: June 1, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
PAULA ABSOLON, *
*
Petitioner, * Joint Stipulation on Damages;
v. * Influenza;
* Shoulder Injury; SIRVA;
SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)
AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
*
Respondent. *
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
John Robert Howie, Jr., Howie Law, PC, Dallas, TX, for petitioner.
Gabrielle Manganiello Fielding, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for
respondent.
DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1
Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
On March 10, 2016, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
administration (“SIRVA”) and an injury to her cervical spine following receipt of an
influenza (“flu”) vaccination on September 22, 2014. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed June
1, 2017, at ¶ 4. Petitioner further alleges that she suffered residual effects of her injury
for more than six months, and that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil
action for damages as a result of her condition. Petition at 10; Stipulation at ¶¶ 4, 6.
The parties further stipulate that “Petitioner sustained a SIRVA, and experienced the
residual effects of her injury for more than six months. Moreover, there is not a
preponderance of evidence demonstrating that petitioner’s SIRVA is due to a factor
unrelated to vaccination.” Stipulation at ¶ 5. “Respondent denies that the flu vaccine is
1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).

Case 1:16-vv-00313-UNJ Document 53 Filed 05/08/18 Page 2 of 7
the cause of petitioner’s alleged cervical spine injury or any other injury or condition
other than SIRVA. ” Stipulation at ¶ 6.
On June 1, 2017, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a
decision should be entered awarding compensation. The undersigned finds the
stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages,
on the terms set forth therein.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, the undersigned
awards the following compensation:
A lump sum of $60,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.
Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of
damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Id.
The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation.
In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Nora Beth Dorsey
Nora Beth Dorsey
Chief Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2

Case 1:16-vv-00313-UNJ Document 53 Filed 05/08/18 Page 3 of 7

Case 1:16-vv-00313-UNJ Document 53 Filed 05/08/18 Page 4 of 7

Case 1:16-vv-00313-UNJ Document 53 Filed 05/08/18 Page 5 of 7

Case 1:16-vv-00313-UNJ Document 53 Filed 05/08/18 Page 6 of 7

Case 1:16-vv-00313-UNJ Document 53 Filed 05/08/18 Page 7 of 7