Z.H. v. HHS - other (2017)

Filed 2015-12-16Decided 2017-06-28Vaccine vaccine
dismissed

Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]

On December 16, 2015, John and Rachel Homick filed a Petition for Vaccine Compensation in the National Vaccine Compensation Program on behalf of their minor child, Z.H., alleging an injury from a vaccine listed on the Vaccine Injury Table. The public decision does not specify the vaccine(s) administered, the date(s) of vaccination, or the specific condition alleged.

The respondent was the Secretary of Health and Human Services. The petitioners acknowledged on May 22, 2017, that they would be unable to prove entitlement to compensation.

To receive compensation, petitioners must prove either a "Table Injury" corresponding to a vaccination or that the injury was actually caused by a vaccine. The record did not contain evidence of a "Table Injury" or a medical expert's opinion or other persuasive evidence indicating that Z.H.'s injury was vaccine-caused.

The public decision notes that the Act requires supporting medical records or a competent physician's opinion, neither of which was offered by the petitioners. Consequently, the petitioners failed to demonstrate entitlement.

Special Master George L. Hastings, Jr. granted the petitioners' motion for a decision dismissing their petition due to insufficient proof of causation.

The case was dismissed for insufficient proof, and the Clerk was ordered to enter judgment accordingly. The public decision does not name the petitioner's counsel or the respondent's counsel.

Theory of causation

Petitioners John and Rachel Homick, on behalf of minor Z.H., filed a petition for vaccine compensation alleging an injury from a vaccine listed on the Vaccine Injury Table. The petition was filed on December 16, 2015. The public decision does not specify the vaccine(s), vaccination date(s), or the alleged injury. Petitioners moved for dismissal on May 22, 2017, acknowledging they could not prove entitlement. To establish entitlement, petitioners must prove either a "Table Injury" or that the injury was "actually caused" by a vaccination. The record lacked evidence of a "Table Injury" and did not contain a medical expert's opinion or other persuasive evidence of vaccine causation. The Special Master found insufficient proof of causation and granted the motion to dismiss. No award was made. Special Master George L. Hastings, Jr. issued the decision on June 1, 2017, with judgment entered on June 28, 2017. The public decision does not name experts or detail the mechanism of injury.

Source PDFs 2 total · 1 downloaded