VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_15-vv-01499
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_15-vv-01499
Petitioner: Lee Patalowski
Filed: 2015-12-11
Decided: 2017-01-10
Vaccine: influenza
Vaccination date: 2012-12-12
Condition: optic neuritis/neuropathy, permanent vision loss, and possible multiple sclerosis
Outcome: dismissed
Award amount USD: 

AI-assisted case summary:
Lee Patalowski filed a petition on December 11, 2015, alleging that he developed visual disturbances, optic neuritis/neuropathy, permanent vision loss, and possible multiple sclerosis as a result of an influenza vaccination received on December 12, 2012. The case progressed procedurally, and an order to show cause was issued on October 14, 2016, requiring Mr. Patalowski to respond by December 13, 2016, as to why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Mr. Patalowski did not respond to this order. The court noted that to receive compensation, a petitioner must prove either a Table Injury or that the injury was actually caused by the vaccine. The record did not contain evidence of a Table Injury, and Mr. Patalowski was pursuing a causation-in-fact claim. However, the Act requires claims to be supported by medical records or a competent physician's opinion, neither of which Mr. Patalowski provided. Consequently, the case was dismissed for failure to prosecute and for insufficient proof. No compensation was awarded.

Theory of causation field:
Off-Table

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_15-vv-01499-0
Date issued/filed: 2017-02-09
Pages: 2
Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 1/10/2017) regarding 16 DECISION of Special Master. Signed by Special Master Christian J. Moran. (kh) Copy to parties.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:15-vv-01499-UNJ Document 17 Filed 02/09/17 Page 1 of 2
;QINAL REISSUED FOR PUBLICATION
9 FEB 2017
OSM
U.S. COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
1Ju tfyc lnitch Qlourt of JJrchcral Qllaimn
~tatcn
Fl LED
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * JAN 10 2017
LEE PATA LOWSKI, *
OSM
* No. 15-1499V F=u~?:s
Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran
*
V. *
* Filed: January 10, 2017
SECRETARY OF HEALTH *
AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Decision dismissing case;
* failure to prosecute.
Respondent. *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Lee Patalowski, Lititz, PA, pro se;
Lisa A. Watts, United States Dep't of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
UNPUBLISHED DECISION DENYING COMPENSATION1
Lee Patalowski filed a petition under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury
Act, 42 U.S.C. §300a-10 et. seq., on December 11, 2015. The petition alleged that
he developed visual disturbances and was later diagnosed with optic
neuritis/neuropathy, permanent vision loss, and possible multiple sclerosis as a
result of the influenza ("flu") vaccination he received on December 12, 2012. The
information in the record, however, does not show entitlement to an award under
the Program.
I. Procedural History
A detailed procedural history of this case can be found in the order to show
cause, filed October 14, 2016. In that order, Mr. Patalowski was instructed to
1 The E-Government, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b) , the parties have 14 days to
file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other information described in 42
U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the
document posted on the website.

Case 1:15-vv-01499-UNJ Document 17 Filed 02/09/17 Page 2 of 2
show cause as to why this case should not be dismissed by December 13, 2016. To
date, Mr. Patalowski has not responded.
II. Analysis
When a petitioner (or plaintiff) fails to comply with Court orders to
prosecute her case, the Court may dismiss the case. Sapharas v. Sec'y of Health &
Human Servs., 35 Fed. Cl. 503 (1996); Tsekouras v. Sec'y of Health & Human
Servs., 26 Cl. Ct. 439 (1992), affd, 991 F.2d 819 (Fed. Cir. 1993) (table); Vaccine
Rule 21(c); see also Claude E. Atkins Enters., Inc. v. United States, 889 F.2d 1180,
1183 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (affirming dismissal of case for failure to prosecute for
counsel's failure to submit pre-trial memorandum); Adkins v. United States, 816
F.2d 1580, 1583 (Fed. Cir. 1987) (affirming dismissal of case for failure of party to
respond to discovery requests).
Additionally, to receive compensation under the National Vaccine Injury
Compensation Program (hereinafter "the Program"), a petitioner must prove either
1) that he suffered a "Table Injury" - i.e., an injury falling within the Vaccine
Injury Table - conesponding to one of his vaccinations, or 2) that he suffered an
injury that was actually caused by a vaccine. See§§ 300aa-13(a)(l)(A) and 300aa-
1 l(c)(l). An examination of the record did not uncover any evidence that Mr.
Patalowski suffered a "Table Injury." Thus, Mr. Patalowski is necessarily
pursuing a causation-in-fact claim.
Under the Act, a petitioner may not be given a Program award based solely
on the petitioner's claims alone. Rather, the petition must be supported by either
medical records or by the opinion of a competent physician. § 300aa-13(a)(l). In
this case, Mr. Patalowski did not file any medical records to suppmt his claim.
Accordingly, Mr. Patalowski failed to demonstrate either that he suffered a "Table
Injury" or that his injuries were "actually caused" by a vaccination.
Thus, this case is dismissed for failure to prosecute and for insufficient
proof. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. See Vaccine Rule 21(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED. t, ..
tlvwdN-
~/
Christian J. Mo~;;'
Special Master