J.T. v. HHS - MMR, Type 1 Diabetes (2016)

Filed 2015-11-23Decided 2016-02-16Vaccine MMR
dismissed

Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]

On November 23, 2015, Kimberly and David Tait filed a petition on behalf of their minor child, J.T., seeking compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. They alleged that J.T. developed Type 1 Diabetes as a result of receiving DTaP, Hib, IPV, and MMR vaccinations on January 30, 2015.

The petitioners were represented by Andrew D. Downing of Van Cott & Talamante, PLLC.

The respondent was the Secretary of Health and Human Services, represented by Robert P. Coleman, III of the United States Department of Justice.

On February 12, 2016, the petitioners filed a motion to dismiss their own petition, stating that after investigation, they recognized they would likely be unable to meet their burden of proof to establish entitlement to compensation. They understood that a dismissal would result in a judgment against them and end J.T.'s rights in the Vaccine Program.

Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey presided over the case. To receive compensation, the petition stated, petitioners must prove either a Table Injury corresponding to the vaccination or that the injury was actually caused by a vaccine.

The record did not contain evidence of a Table Injury, nor did the petitioners allege one. Furthermore, the record lacked a medical expert's opinion or other persuasive evidence indicating that J.T.'s Type 1 Diabetes was caused by the vaccinations.

Because the medical records were insufficient and no medical opinion was offered, the petitioners failed to demonstrate entitlement. Consequently, the case was dismissed for insufficient proof.

Theory of causation

Petitioners Kimberly and David Tait, on behalf of minor J.T., alleged that DTaP, Hib, IPV, and MMR vaccinations administered on January 30, 2015, caused Type 1 Diabetes. The public decision does not describe the specific theory of causation or any medical expert opinions presented. Petitioners later moved to dismiss their petition, acknowledging they could not meet their burden of proof. The Special Master noted that entitlement requires proof of a Table Injury or actual causation by a vaccine. The record lacked evidence of a Table Injury and no medical expert opinion or other persuasive evidence was presented to establish actual causation. The case was dismissed for insufficient proof. Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey issued the decision. Attorneys for petitioners were Andrew D. Downing and for respondent Robert P. Coleman, III. The decision date was February 16, 2016.

Source PDFs 2 total · 1 downloaded