Janet Cakir v. HHS - other (2016)
Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]
Janet Cakir, as parent and guardian of C.A.C., a minor, filed a petition for vaccine compensation on November 16, 2015, alleging that various vaccinations injured C.A.C. The public decision does not specify the vaccines received or the alleged injuries.
On April 20, 2016, Petitioner moved for a decision dismissing her petition, citing insufficient proof of causation. The Special Master granted this motion.
Accordingly, the case was dismissed, and no award was made. The public decision does not describe the clinical story, expert testimony, or specific reasoning beyond the petitioner's motion.
Theory of causation
Petitioner Janet Cakir filed a petition for vaccine compensation on November 16, 2015, alleging injury to minor C.A.C. from various vaccinations. The specific vaccines, vaccination dates, and alleged injuries are not detailed in the public decision. On April 20, 2016, Petitioner moved for dismissal, citing insufficient proof of causation. Special Master George L. Hastings granted the motion, dismissing the case without an award. The public decision does not describe the medical condition, onset, symptoms, diagnostic tests, treatments, or expert opinions regarding the theory of causation.
Source PDFs
USCOURTS-cofc-1_15-vv-01383