Lisa Santoroski v. HHS - Influenza, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), inappropriate sinus tachycardia (IST), myopathy (2019)
Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]
On October 30, 2015, Lisa Santoroski filed a petition alleging that an influenza vaccine administered on November 4, 2012, caused her to suffer from postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), inappropriate sinus tachycardia (IST), and myopathy. The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, denied that the vaccine caused or significantly aggravated petitioner's conditions.
Despite the denial, the parties reached a stipulation for an award of compensation. Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey reviewed the stipulation.
The parties agreed that petitioner would receive a lump sum of $15,000.00, payable to Ms. Santoroski, as compensation for all damages.
The Special Master found the stipulation reasonable and adopted it as the decision of the Court. Judgment was to be entered in accordance with the stipulation, unless a motion for review was filed.
Petitioner was represented by Robert J. Krakow of the Law Office of Robert J.
Krakow, P.C., and respondent was represented by Claudia B. Gangi of the U.S.
Department of Justice. The decision was filed on October 25, 2019.
Theory of causation
Petitioner Lisa Santoroski alleged that an influenza vaccine administered on November 4, 2012, caused her to suffer from postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), inappropriate sinus tachycardia (IST), and myopathy. Respondent denied causation. The parties filed a joint stipulation for compensation, which the Special Master adopted. The stipulation awarded petitioner a lump sum of $15,000.00 for all damages. The public decision does not describe the specific theory of causation, medical experts, clinical details of the alleged injury, or the mechanism of injury. The decision was based on the stipulation, not on a finding of causation after litigation. Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey issued the decision on October 25, 2019. Petitioner's counsel was Robert J. Krakow, and respondent's counsel was Claudia B. Gangi.
Source PDFs
USCOURTS-cofc-1_15-vv-01294