VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_15-vv-01190 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_15-vv-01190 Petitioner: Alicia Lusk Filed: 2015-10-13 Decided: 2016-12-01 Vaccine: influenza Vaccination date: 2013-11-01 Condition: complex regional pain syndrome Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 157000 AI-assisted case summary: Alicia Lusk filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on October 13, 2015, alleging that she suffered left arm pain caused by her influenza vaccination on November 1, 2013. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit. Respondent conceded entitlement to compensation for complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), stating that the injury was more likely than not caused by the flu vaccination. Respondent also confirmed that the claim was timely filed, the vaccine was on the Vaccine Injury Table, administered in the United States, and the injury effects lasted more than six months. The ruling on entitlement was issued on January 28, 2016. Subsequently, on September 20, 2016, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation, recommending an award of $157,000.00, which petitioner agreed to. The decision awarding damages was issued on December 1, 2016, granting petitioner a lump sum payment of $157,000.00, representing compensation for all damages available under the Vaccine Act. Theory of causation field: Table Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_15-vv-01190-0 Date issued/filed: 2016-05-04 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 01/28/2016) regarding 22 Ruling on Entitlement ( Signed by Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey.)(mpj) Copy to parties. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:15-vv-01190-UNJ Document 30 Filed 05/04/16 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-1190V Filed: January 28, 2016 Unpublished * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ALICIA LUSK, * * Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccination; * Complex Regional Pain Syndrome SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“CRPS”); Special Processing Unit AND HUMAN SERVICES, * (“SPU”) * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Anne Carrion Toale, Maglio Christopher and Toale, Sarasota, Fl, for petitioner. Adriana Ruth Teitel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 Dorsey, Chief Special Master: On October 13, 2015, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 [the “Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. Petitioner alleges that she suffered left arm pain that was caused by her November 1, 2013 influenza [“flu”] vaccination. Petition, ¶2. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On January 21, 2016, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) report in which she concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent indicates that “petitioner is entitled to 1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:15-vv-01190-UNJ Document 30 Filed 05/04/16 Page 2 of 2 compensation for her complex regional pain syndrome,3 which she sustained following receipt of the flu vaccination on November 1, 2013.” Id. Respondent agrees that “[t]he facts of this case support a finding that petitioner’s CRPS, more likely than not, was caused by the administration of the influenza vaccination on November 1, 2013.” Id. at 4. Additionally, respondent indicates that the record demonstrates that the claim was timely filed, “that petitioner received a vaccine set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table, and that the vaccine was received in the United States.” Id. Respondent further indicates “that petitioner suffered the effects or sequelae of her injury for more than six months after vaccine administration,” and that the petition indicates petitioner has pursued no prior civil action or proceeding in connection with her injury. Id. In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master 3“Petitioner’s injury is identified in the petition as a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (‘SIRVA’). Petition at ¶ 8. After a review of petitioner’s medical records, respondent determined that petitioner’s clinical course is consistent with complex regional pain syndrome (‘CRPS’).” Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1, n.1. 2 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_15-vv-01190-1 Date issued/filed: 2016-12-01 Pages: 4 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 09/21/2016) regarding 39 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer, ( Signed by Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey.)(mpj) Copy to parties. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:15-vv-01190-UNJ Document 43 Filed 12/01/16 Page 1 of 4 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-1190V Filed: September 21, 2016 UNPUBLISHED * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ALICIA LUSK, * * Petitioner, * Damages Decision Based on Proffer; v. * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; Complex * Regional Pain Syndrome (“CPRS”); SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Diana Stadelnikas Sedar, Maglio Christopher and Toale, Sarasota, FL, for petitioner. Adriana Ruth Teitel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 Dorsey, Chief Special Master: On October 13, 2015, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that she suffered left arm pain that was caused by a November 1, 2013 influenza (“flu”) vaccination. Petition at ¶ 2. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On January 28, 2016, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled to compensation for complex regional pain syndrome (“CRPS”). On September 20, 2016, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be awarded $157,000.00. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Based on the record as a 1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:15-vv-01190-UNJ Document 43 Filed 12/01/16 Page 2 of 4 whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards petitioner a lump sum payment of $157,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Alicia Lusk. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 300aa-15(a). The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:15-vv-01190-UNJ Document 43 Filed 12/01/16 Page 3 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ALICIA LUSK, Petitioner, v. No. 15-1190V Chief Special Master Dorsey ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION I. Compensation for Vaccine Injury-Related Items On January 21, 2016, respondent filed a Rule 4(c) Report conceding that petitioner was entitled to vaccine compensation for her complex regional pain syndrome injury. Respondent proffers that based on the evidence of record, petitioner should be awarded $157,000.00. This amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees. II. Form of the Award Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment as described below, and requests that the special master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following:1 A lump sum payment of $157,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Alicia Lusk. This amount accounts for all elements of compensation under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) to which petitioner would be entitled. Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. 1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, respondent reserves the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future pain and suffering, and future lost wages. Case 1:15-vv-01190-UNJ Document 43 Filed 12/01/16 Page 4 of 4 Respectfully submitted, BENJAMIN C. MIZER Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division CATHARINE E. REEVES Acting Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division LYNN E. RICCIARDELLA Senior Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division /s/ Adriana Teitel ADRIANA TEITEL Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146, Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 616-3677 Dated: September 20, 2016 2 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 3: USCOURTS-cofc-1_15-vv-01190-2 Date issued/filed: 2016-12-05 Pages: 4 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 09/21/2016) regarding 39 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer, ( Signed by Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey.)(mpj) Copy to parties. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:15-vv-01190-UNJ Document 44 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 4 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-1190V Filed: September 21, 2016 UNPUBLISHED * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ALICIA LUSK, * * Petitioner, * Damages Decision Based on Proffer; v. * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; Complex * Regional Pain Syndrome (“CPRS”); SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Diana Stadelnikas Sedar, Maglio Christopher and Toale, Sarasota, FL, for petitioner. Adriana Ruth Teitel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 Dorsey, Chief Special Master: On October 13, 2015, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that she suffered left arm pain that was caused by a November 1, 2013 influenza (“flu”) vaccination. Petition at ¶ 2. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On January 28, 2016, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled to compensation for complex regional pain syndrome (“CRPS”). On September 20, 2016, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be awarded $157,000.00. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Based on the record as a 1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:15-vv-01190-UNJ Document 44 Filed 12/05/16 Page 2 of 4 whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards petitioner a lump sum payment of $157,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Alicia Lusk. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 300aa-15(a). The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:15-vv-01190-UNJ Document 44 Filed 12/05/16 Page 3 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ALICIA LUSK, Petitioner, v. No. 15-1190V Chief Special Master Dorsey ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION I. Compensation for Vaccine Injury-Related Items On January 21, 2016, respondent filed a Rule 4(c) Report conceding that petitioner was entitled to vaccine compensation for her complex regional pain syndrome injury. Respondent proffers that based on the evidence of record, petitioner should be awarded $157,000.00. This amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees. II. Form of the Award Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment as described below, and requests that the special master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following:1 A lump sum payment of $157,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Alicia Lusk. This amount accounts for all elements of compensation under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) to which petitioner would be entitled. Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. 1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, respondent reserves the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future pain and suffering, and future lost wages. Case 1:15-vv-01190-UNJ Document 44 Filed 12/05/16 Page 4 of 4 Respectfully submitted, BENJAMIN C. MIZER Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division CATHARINE E. REEVES Acting Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division LYNN E. RICCIARDELLA Senior Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division /s/ Adriana Teitel ADRIANA TEITEL Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146, Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 616-3677 Dated: September 20, 2016 2