VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_15-vv-01029
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_15-vv-01029
Petitioner: Joice Finn
Filed: 2016-10-21
Decided: 2017-02-13
Vaccine: influenza
Vaccination date: 2014-10-17
Condition: left shoulder injury
Outcome: compensated
Award amount USD: 30000

AI-assisted case summary:
Joice Finn filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on October 21, 2016, alleging that she suffered a left shoulder injury caused-in-fact by her October 17, 2014, influenza vaccination. She further alleged that she experienced residual effects of her injury for more than six months and that there had been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on her behalf. The respondent denied that the flu vaccine caused petitioner's alleged shoulder injury and residual effects, denied that she suffered residual effects for more than six months, and denied that the flu vaccine caused any other injury or her current condition. Despite the respondent's denials, the parties filed a joint stipulation on October 21, 2016, agreeing that compensation should be awarded. Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey found the stipulation reasonable and adopted it as the decision of the Court. Joice Finn was awarded a lump sum of $30,000.00, payable to her, as compensation for all items of damages available under the Vaccine Act. The decision was entered on February 13, 2017. The public decision does not describe the specific onset of symptoms, medical examinations, diagnostic tests, treatments, or expert witnesses. Petitioner was represented by Andrew Donald Downing of Van Cott & Talamante, PLLC, and respondent was represented by Jennifer Leigh Reynaud of the U.S. Department of Justice.

Theory of causation field:
Petitioner Joice Finn alleged that her left shoulder injury, resulting from an October 17, 2014, influenza vaccination, caused residual effects for more than six months. Respondent denied causation. The parties filed a joint stipulation agreeing to an award. The Special Master adopted the stipulation. Petitioner received a $30,000.00 lump sum award. The theory of causation was "Off-Table" according to the provided data, and the public decision does not detail the specific medical mechanism, expert testimony, or key evidence considered beyond the stipulation. The decision was entered on February 13, 2017, by Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey. Petitioner's counsel was Andrew Donald Downing, and respondent's counsel was Jennifer Leigh Reynaud.

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_15-vv-01029-0
Date issued/filed: 2017-02-13
Pages: 7
Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 10/21/2016) regarding 27 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer (Signed by Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey.)(mpj) Copy to parties.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:15-vv-01029-UNJ Document 37 Filed 02/13/17 Page 1 of 7
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 15-1029V
Filed: October 21, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
JOICE FINN, *
*
Petitioner, * Joint Stipulation on Damages;
v. * Influenza;
* Shoulder Injury; SIRVA;
SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)
AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
*
Respondent. *
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Andrew Donald Downing, Van Cott & Talamante, PLLC, Phoenix, AZ, for petitioner.
Jennifer Leigh Reynaud, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1
Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
On September 15, 2016, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a left shoulder injury caused-in-fact
by her October 17, 2014 influenza vaccination. Petition at 3; Stipulation, filed October
21, 2016, at ¶ 4. Petitioner further alleges that she suffered residual effects of her injury
for more than six months and that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil
action for damages on her behalf as a result of her injury. Petition at 3; Stipulation at ¶¶
4-5. “Respondent denies that petitioner’s alleged shoulder injury and residual effects
were caused-in-fact by the flu vaccine, denies that she suffered residual effects of her
alleged injury for more than six months; and denies that the flu vaccine caused
petitioner any other injury or her current condition. ” Stipulation at ¶ 6.
1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).

Case 1:15-vv-01029-UNJ Document 37 Filed 02/13/17 Page 2 of 7
Nevertheless, on October 21, 2016, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation,
stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. The undersigned
finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding
damages, on the terms set forth therein.
The parties stipulate that petitioner shall receive the following compensation:
A lump sum of $30,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.
Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of
damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Id.
The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation.
In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Nora Beth Dorsey
Nora Beth Dorsey
Chief Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2

Case 1:15-vv-01029-UNJ Document 37 Filed 02/13/17 Page 3 of 7

Case 1:15-vv-01029-UNJ Document 37 Filed 02/13/17 Page 4 of 7

Case 1:15-vv-01029-UNJ Document 37 Filed 02/13/17 Page 5 of 7

Case 1:15-vv-01029-UNJ Document 37 Filed 02/13/17 Page 6 of 7

Case 1:15-vv-01029-UNJ Document 37 Filed 02/13/17 Page 7 of 7