VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_15-vv-00911
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_15-vv-00911
Petitioner: Irma Scott
Filed: 2017-08-08
Decided: 2018-05-31
Vaccine: influenza
Vaccination date: 2013-08-15
Condition: vasovagal syncope and a subdural hematoma
Outcome: compensated
Award amount USD: 119753

AI-assisted case summary:
On August 8, 2017, Irma Scott filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. The petition alleged that Ms. Scott suffered from vasovagal syncope and a subdural hematoma as a result of receiving an influenza vaccine on August 15, 2013. The petition stated that the vaccine was administered in the United States, that Ms. Scott experienced residual effects of the injury for more than six months, and that there had been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on her behalf. The respondent denied that the flu vaccine caused petitioner to suffer from vasovagal syncope or a subdural hematoma or any other injury or her current condition, and denied that she suffered the residual effects of the alleged injury for more than six months. Despite the respondent's denial, the parties filed a joint stipulation on August 7, 2017, agreeing that compensation should be awarded. Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey found the stipulation reasonable and adopted it as the decision of the Court. Ms. Scott was awarded a lump sum of $119,753.00, payable to petitioner, as compensation for all items of damages. Petitioner's counsel was Curtis R. Webb, and respondent's counsel was Christine Mary Becer. The decision was issued on May 31, 2018.

Theory of causation field:
Petitioner Irma Scott alleged that she suffered from vasovagal syncope and a subdural hematoma as a result of receiving an influenza vaccine on August 15, 2013. Respondent denied that the flu vaccine caused these injuries. The parties filed a joint stipulation agreeing to an award of compensation. The public decision does not describe the specific theory of causation, medical experts, clinical details of the alleged injury onset or progression, diagnostic tests, or treatments. Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey adopted the stipulation, awarding a lump sum of $119,753.00 for all items of damages. The decision was issued on May 31, 2018, based on a stipulation filed August 7, 2017. Petitioner was represented by Curtis R. Webb, and respondent by Christine Mary Becer.

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_15-vv-00911-1
Date issued/filed: 2018-05-31
Pages: 7
Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 08/08/2017) regarding 54 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer ( Signed by Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey. )(mpj) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:15-vv-00911-UNJ Document 63 Filed 05/31/18 Page 1 of 7
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 15-911V
Filed: August 8, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
IRMA SCOTT,
Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint
Stipulation on Damages; Influenza
Petitioner,
(Flu) Vaccine; Vasovagal Syncope
v.
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Curtis R. Webb, Twin Falls, ID, for petitioner.
Christine Mary Becer, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1
Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
On August 21, 2015, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered from vasovagal syncope and a
subdural hematoma as a result of receiving an influenza (“flu”) vaccination on August
15, 2013. Petition at 1-2; Stipulation, filed August 7, 2017, at ¶ 4. Petitioner further
alleges the vaccine was administered within the United States, that she experienced the
residual effects of this injury for more than six months, and that there has been no prior
award or settlement of a civil action for damages on her behalf as a result of her
condition. Petition at 1-5; Stipulation at ¶¶ 3-5. “Respondent denies that the flu vaccine
caused petitioner to suffer from vasovagal syncope or a subdural hematoma or any
other injury or her current condition, and denies that she suffered the residual effects of
the alleged injury for more than six months.” Stipulation at ¶ 6.
1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).

Case 1:15-vv-00911-UNJ Document 63 Filed 05/31/18 Page 2 of 7
Nevertheless, on August 7, 2017, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation,
stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. The undersigned
finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding
damages, on the terms set forth therein.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, the undersigned
awards the following compensation:
A lump sum of $119,753.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.
Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of
damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Id.
The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation.
In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Nora Beth Dorsey
Nora Beth Dorsey
Chief Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2

Case 1:15-vv-00911-UNJ Document 63 Filed 05/31/18 Page 3 of 7

Case 1:15-vv-00911-UNJ Document 63 Filed 05/31/18 Page 4 of 7

Case 1:15-vv-00911-UNJ Document 63 Filed 05/31/18 Page 5 of 7

Case 1:15-vv-00911-UNJ Document 63 Filed 05/31/18 Page 6 of 7

Case 1:15-vv-00911-UNJ Document 63 Filed 05/31/18 Page 7 of 7