VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_15-vv-00823
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_15-vv-00823
Petitioner: Denise Lee
Filed: 2015-08-03
Decided: 2018-05-31
Vaccine: influenza
Vaccination date: 2014-10-17
Condition: transverse myelitis
Outcome: compensated
Award amount USD: 39807

AI-assisted case summary:
On August 3, 2015, Denise Lee filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, alleging that she suffered transverse myelitis (TM) as a result of an influenza vaccine received on October 17, 2014. The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, maintained its position that the flu vaccine did not cause Ms. Lee's TM or any other injury. Despite this disagreement, the parties filed a joint stipulation on May 30, 2018, agreeing to settle the issues and award compensation to Ms. Lee. The stipulation provided for a lump sum payment of $35,000.00 to Ms. Lee and an additional $4,807.57 to reimburse a Medicaid lien. Special Master Thomas L. Gowen reviewed the stipulation, found it reasonable, and adopted it as the decision of the Court. Judgment was ordered to be entered in accordance with the terms of the stipulation. The case was compensated based on this joint stipulation. Petitioner was represented by Maximillian Muller of Muller Brazil, LLP, and respondent was represented by Meredith Healy of the United States Department of Justice. The public decision does not describe the onset of symptoms, specific medical tests, treatments, or expert witnesses.

Theory of causation field:
Petitioner Denise Lee alleged that she suffered transverse myelitis (TM) as a result of an influenza vaccine received on October 17, 2014. The respondent denied that the vaccine caused the alleged injury. The parties reached a settlement through a joint stipulation, agreeing to an award of compensation. The stipulation awarded a lump sum of $35,000.00 to petitioner and $4,807.57 for a Medicaid lien reimbursement. Special Master Thomas L. Gowen found the stipulation reasonable and adopted it as the decision of the Court. The public decision does not detail the specific theory of causation, medical experts, or the mechanism by which the vaccine allegedly caused the TM.

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_15-vv-00823-0
Date issued/filed: 2018-06-25
Pages: 7
Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 05/31/2018) regarding 59 DECISION of Special Master on Stipulation. Signed by Special Master Thomas L. Gowen. (kl) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:15-vv-00823-UNJ Document 63 Filed 06/25/18 Page 1 of 7
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
Filed: May 31, 2018
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
DENISE LEE, * UNPUBLISHED
*
Petitioner, * No. 15-823V
*
v. * Special Master Gowen
*
SECRETARY OF HEALTH *
AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Joint Stipulation; Influenza (“Flu”);
* Transverse Myelitis (“TM”).
Respondent. *
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Maximillian Muller, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.
Meredith Healy, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION ON STIPULATION1
On August 3, 2015, Denise Lee (“Petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation pursuant
to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 Petitioner alleges that she suffered
transverse myelitis (“TM”) as the result of an influenza vaccine she received on October 17,
2014. Petition at Preamble; Stipulation at ¶ 4.
On May 30, 2018, the parties filed a joint stipulation (“Stipulation”) in which they state
that a decision should be entered awarding compensation to petitioner. ECF No. 58. Respondent
denies that the flu vaccine petitioner received caused her to suffer from TM or any other injury
or condition. Id. at ¶ 6.
1
Pursuant to the E-Government Act of 2002, see 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012), because this decision contains a
reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to post it on the website of the United States Court of
Federal Claims. The court’s website is at http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/aggregator/sources/7. Before the decision
is posted on the court’s website, each party has 14 days to file a motion requesting redaction “of any information
furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or
confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly
unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). “An objecting party must provide the court with a proposed
redacted version of the decision.” Id. If neither party files a motion for redaction within 14 days, the decision
will be posted on the court’s website without any changes. Id.
2
The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine
Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2012)
(Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. §
300aa.

Case 1:15-vv-00823-UNJ Document 63 Filed 06/25/18 Page 2 of 7
Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the
issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding
compensation to petitioner according to the terms of the joint stipulation attached hereto as
Appendix A.
The joint stipulation awards:3
a. A lump sum of $35,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner; and
b. A lump sum of $4,807.57, which amounts represents reimbursement of a
Medicaid lien, in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner and
Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing
1570 Grant Street
Denver, Colorado 80203
Petitioner agrees to endorse this check to the Colorado Department of Health
Care Policy and Financing.
I find the stipulation reasonable and I adopt it as the decision of the Court in
awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.
Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with
the terms of the parties’ stipulation.4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Thomas L. Gowen
Thomas L. Gowen
Special Master
3 These amounts represent compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).
4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the
right to seek review.
2

CCaassee 11::1155--vvvv--0000882233--UUNNJJ DDooccuummeenntt 5683 FFiilleedd 0056//3205//1188 PPaaggee 13 ooff 57

CCaassee 11::1155--vvvv--0000882233--UUNNJJ DDooccuummeenntt 5683 FFiilleedd 0056//3205//1188 PPaaggee 24 ooff 57

CCaassee 11::1155--vvvv--0000882233--UUNNJJ DDooccuummeenntt 5683 FFiilleedd 0056//3205//1188 PPaaggee 35 ooff 57

CCaassee 11::1155--vvvv--0000882233--UUNNJJ DDooccuummeenntt 5683 FFiilleedd 0056//3205//1188 PPaaggee 46 ooff 57

CCaassee 11::1155--vvvv--0000882233--UUNNJJ DDooccuummeenntt 5683 FFiilleedd 0056//3205//1188 PPaaggee 57 ooff 57