VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_15-vv-00775 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_15-vv-00775 Petitioner: Jane K. Baker Filed: 2015-10-30 Decided: 2016-05-03 Vaccine: influenza Vaccination date: 2014-10-15 Condition: frozen shoulder and subdeltoid bursitis Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 105000 AI-assisted case summary: Jane K. Baker filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on October 30, 2015, alleging that she suffered from frozen shoulder and subdeltoid bursitis in her left shoulder as a result of receiving an influenza vaccine on October 15, 2014. The respondent conceded that Ms. Baker met the statutory requirements for entitlement to compensation, noting that her injury sequelae lasted for more than six months. A ruling on entitlement was issued on October 30, 2015, finding her entitled to compensation. Subsequently, on January 4, 2016, the respondent filed a proffer recommending an award of $105,000.00, which Ms. Baker agreed to. This amount was awarded as compensation for all damages. Additionally, on January 28, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation for attorneys' fees and costs, agreeing to an award of $18,500.00, which was also granted. Theory of causation field: Table Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_15-vv-00775-0 Date issued/filed: 2015-11-23 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 10/30/2015) regarding 18 Ruling on Entitlement (Signed by Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey.)(mpj) Copy to parties. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:15-vv-00775-UNJ Document 20 Filed 11/23/15 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-775V Filed: October 30, 2015 UNPUBLISHED * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * JANE K. BAKER, * * Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; * Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Left Shoulder * Injury; Shoulder Injury Related to SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Vaccine Administration (SIRVA); AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Special Processing Unit (SPU). * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Lawrence R. Cohan, Anapol, Schwartz, et al., Philadelphia, PA, for petitioner. Sarah Christina Duncan, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 Dorsey, Chief Special Master: On July 23, 2015, Jane Baker (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 [the “Vaccine Act”]. Petitioner alleges that as a result of receiving the influenza (“flu”) vaccine on October 15, 2014, she suffered from “frozen shoulder and subdeltoid bursitis” in her left shoulder that was caused in fact by her flu vaccination. Petition at 1, 4. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On October 30, 2015, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) report in which she concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 3. Specifically, respondent states “petitioner has met the statutory requirements for entitlement to compensation. Therefore, based on the record as it now 1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:15-vv-00775-UNJ Document 20 Filed 11/23/15 Page 2 of 2 stands, petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act.” Id. at 4 (citations omitted). Respondent further states that the records show that petitioner suffered the sequela of her injury for more than six months. Id. In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence presented, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation. s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master 2 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_15-vv-00775-1 Date issued/filed: 2016-05-03 Pages: 4 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 01/04/2016) regarding 24 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer (Signed by Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey.)(mpj) Copy to parties. Modified on 5/4/2016 - corrected PDF (jt1). -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:15-vv-00775-UNJ Document 33 Filed 05/03/16 Page 1 of 4 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-0775V Filed: January 4, 2016 Unpublished * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * JANE K. BAKER, * * Petitioner, * Damages Decision Based on Proffer; * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; Frozen * Shoulder; Sub-deltoid Bursitis; Shoulder SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Injury Related to Vaccine Administration AND HUMAN SERVICES, * (“SIRVA”); Special Processing Unit * (“SPU”) Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Lawrence R. Cohan, Anapol Weiss, Philadelphia, PA, for petitioner. Sarah Christina Duncan, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 Dorsey, Chief Special Master: On July 23, 2015, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 [the “Vaccine Act”]. Petitioner alleged that she suffered from frozen shoulder and subdeltoid bursitis which were caused in fact by the influenza (“flu”) vaccine she received on October 15, 2014. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On October 30, 2015, a ruling on entitlement was issued finding petitioner entitled to compensation. On January 4, 2016, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation [“Proffer”] stating that petitioner should be awarded $105,000.00. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, respondent represents that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. 1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:15-vv-00775-UNJ Document 33 Filed 05/03/16 Page 2 of 4 Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards petitioner a lump sum payment of $105,000.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Jane. K. Baker. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 300aa-15(a). The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:15-vv-00775-UNJ Document 33 Filed 05/03/16 Page 3 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ) JANE K. BAKER, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) No. 15-0775V v. ) Chief Special Master Dorsey ) ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN ) SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ) PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION I. Items of Compensation Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $105,000.00, which represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).1 Petitioner agrees. II. Form of the Award Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment of $105,000.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. Petitioner agrees. Respectfully submitted, BENJAMIN C. MIZER Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General RUPA BHATTACHARYYA Director Torts Branch, Civil Division 1 Should petitioner die prior to the entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering. Case 1:15-vv-00775-UNJ Document 33 Filed 05/03/16 Page 4 of 4 VINCENT J. MATANOSKI Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division MICHAEL P. MILMOE Senior Trial Counsel Torts Branch, Civil Division s/ Sarah C. Duncan Sarah C. Duncan Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 514-9729 Fax: (202) 616-4310 DATED: January 4, 2016 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 3: USCOURTS-cofc-1_15-vv-00775-2 Date issued/filed: 2016-05-04 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 01/28/2016) regarding 30 DECISION Fees Stipulation/Proffer ( Signed by Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey.)(mpj) Copy to parties. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:15-vv-00775-UNJ Document 34 Filed 05/04/16 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-0775V Filed: January 28, 2016 UNPUBLISHED * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * JANE K. BAKER, * * Petitioner, * v. * * Attorneys’ Fees and Costs; Stipulation SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Lawrence R. Cohan, Anapol Weiss, Philadelphia, PA, for petitioner. Sarah Christina Duncan, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. DECISION ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1 Dorsey, Chief Special Master: On July 23, 2015, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 [the “Vaccine Act”]. Petitioner alleged that she suffered from a frozen shoulder and subdeltoid bursitis which were caused by an influenza (“flu”) vaccine she received on October 15, 2014. On January 4, 2016, the undersigned issued a decision awarding compensation to petitioner based on respondent’s proffer. On January 28, 2016, the parties filed a Stipulation of Facts Concerning Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. According to the stipulation, the parties stipulate to an award of $18,500.00. In accordance with General Order #9, petitioner’s counsel represents that petitioner incurred no out-of-pocket expenses. 1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:15-vv-00775-UNJ Document 34 Filed 05/04/16 Page 2 of 2 The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. § 300 aa-15(e). Based on the reasonableness of petitioner’s request and the lack of any objection by respondent, the undersigned GRANTS the request for approval and payment of attorneys’ fees and costs. Accordingly, the undersigned awards the total of $18,500.00,3 as a lump sum in the form of a check jointly payable to petitioner and petitioner’s counsel Lawrence Cohan. The clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith.4 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master 3 This amount is intended to cover all legal expenses incurred in this matter. This award encompasses all charges by the attorney against a client, “advanced costs” as well as fees for legal services rendered. Furthermore, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e)(3) prevents an attorney from charging or collecting fees (including costs) that would be in addition to the amount awarded herein. See generally Beck v. Sec’y, HHS, 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir.1991). 4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2