VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_15-vv-00652 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_15-vv-00652 Petitioner: Matthew Wolfe Filed: 2016-05-31 Decided: 2016-06-21 Vaccine: meningococcal Vaccination date: 2012-06-27 Condition: Guillain-Barré Syndrome Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 106000 AI-assisted case summary: On May 31, 2016, Stephanie Wolfe filed a petition on behalf of her then-minor son, Matthew Wolfe, alleging that the meningococcal vaccine administered on June 27, 2012, caused him to develop Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS). The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, denied that the vaccine caused Petitioner's GBS or any other injury. The parties subsequently filed a joint stipulation on damages and attorneys' fees. The Special Master, Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman, found the stipulation to be reasonable and noted that the petition was brought in good faith with a reasonable basis for the claim. The stipulation awarded Matthew Wolfe a lump sum of $85,000.00 for all damages, payable to Petitioner. Additionally, a lump sum of $21,000.00 was awarded for attorneys' fees and litigation costs, payable jointly to Petitioner and his counsel, Timothy J. Carpuso, Esq. The court adopted the stipulation as its decision, and judgment was to be entered accordingly. The case caption was later amended to reflect that Matthew Wolfe was no longer a minor. The public decision does not describe the specific onset of symptoms, medical tests, treatments, or the mechanism of causation. Theory of causation field: Petitioner Matthew Wolfe alleged that the meningococcal vaccine received on June 27, 2012, caused him to develop Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS). The respondent denied causation. The parties entered into a joint stipulation on damages and attorneys' fees, which was approved by Special Master Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman. The stipulation resulted in an award of $85,000.00 for all damages and $21,000.00 for attorneys' fees and costs. The public decision does not detail the specific theory of causation, medical experts, or the mechanism by which the vaccine allegedly caused GBS. Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_15-vv-00652-0 Date issued/filed: 2016-06-21 Pages: 7 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 5/31/2016) regarding 28 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer Signed by Special Master Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A)(pn) Copy to parties. Modified on 7/11/2019 to include the attachment(s) in the main document for posting to the courts website (da). -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:15-vv-00652-UNJ Document 29 Filed 06/21/16 Page 1 of 7 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-652V Filed: May 31, 2016 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * UNPUBLISHED MATTHEW WOLFE, * * Special Master Hamilton-Fieldman Petitioner, * * Joint Stipulation on Damages; v. * Joint Stipulation on SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Attorneys’ Fees and Costs; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Timothy John Carpurso, Gordon, Feinblatt, et al., Baltimore, MD, for Petitioner. Ryan Daniel Pyles, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. DECISION1 On July 29, 2014, Stephanie Wolfe filed a petition, on behalf of her then-minor son, Matthew Wolfe (“Petitioner”),2 pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.3 Petitioner alleges that his receipt of the meningococcal vaccine on June 27, 2012 caused him to develop Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”). On May 31, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation in which they state that a decision should be entered awarding compensation and attorneys’ fees and costs. Respondent denies that the meningococcal vaccine is the cause of Petitioner’s alleged GBS and/or any other injury. 1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case, the undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims, in accordance with the purposes espoused in the E-Government Act of 2002. See 44 U.S.C. § 3501 (2012). Each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). 2 On October 26, 2015, the case caption was amended to reflect the fact that Petitioner was no longer a minor and was pursuing the case on his own behalf. 3 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2012). 1 Case 1:15-vv-00652-UNJ Document 29 Filed 06/21/16 Page 2 of 7 Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto as Appendix A. The undersigned finds the stipulation reasonable, observes that this petition was brought in good faith and that there existed a reasonable basis for the claim, and notes that in accordance with General Order #9, the parties represent that Petitioner did personally not incur any costs in pursuit of his vaccine claim. Accordingly, the undersigned adopts the stipulation as the decision of the Court in awarding damages and attorneys’ fees, on the terms set forth therein: The parties stipulate that Petitioner shall receive the following compensation: A lump sum of $85,000.00, in the form of a check payable to [P]etitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). A lump sum of $21,000.00, in the form of a check payable jointly to [P]etitioner and [P]etitioner’s counsel, Timothy J. Carpuso, Esq., for all attorneys’ fees and litigation costs available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e). Stipulation at 2, ECF No. 27. In sum, the undersigned approves the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation and attorneys’ fees and costs. Accordingly, an award should be made consistent with the stipulation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation.4 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman Special Master 4 Entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. Vaccine Rule 11(a). 2 CCCaaassseee 1 11:1::11555-v--vvvvv-0--00000666555222-U--UUNNNJJJ D DDooocccuuummmeeennnt tt2 22879-1 FF Fiilleeileddd 00 0565//32/3111//11/1666 PP Paaagggeee 13 1 oo off f57 5 CCCaaassseee 1 11:1::11555-v--vvvvv-0--00000666555222-U--UUNNNJJJ D DDooocccuuummmeeennnt tt2 22879-1 FF Fiilleeileddd 00 0565//32/3111//11/1666 PP Paaagggeee 24 2 oo off f57 5 CCCaaassseee 1 11:1::11555-v--vvvvv-0--00000666555222-U--UUNNNJJJ D DDooocccuuummmeeennnt tt2 22879-1 FF Fiilleeileddd 00 0565//32/3111//11/1666 PP Paaagggeee 35 3 oo off f57 5 CCCaaassseee 1 11:1::11555-v--vvvvv-0--00000666555222-U--UUNNNJJJ D DDooocccuuummmeeennnt tt2 22879-1 FF Fiilleeileddd 00 0565//32/3111//11/1666 PP Paaagggeee 46 4 oo off f57 5 CCCaaassseee 1 11:1::11555-v--vvvvv-0--00000666555222-U--UUNNNJJJ D DDooocccuuummmeeennnt tt2 22879-1 FF Fiilleeileddd 00 0565//32/3111//11/1666 PP Paaagggeee 57 5 oo off f57 5