Roy Bush v. HHS - other (2017)

Filed 2015-05-11Decided 2017-02-23Vaccine vaccine
dismissed

Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]

Roy Bush filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on May 11, 2015, alleging injury from a vaccine listed on the Vaccine Injury Table. Initially, Mr.

Bush was represented by counsel. His attorney was granted leave to withdraw on August 2, 2016.

A status conference was held on September 28, 2016, during which Mr. Bush informed the court that he was seeking new counsel.

Following this conference, the Special Master ordered Mr. Bush to file a status report by November 14, 2016, detailing his progress in retaining new legal representation.

Court staff attempted to contact Mr. Bush by telephone on November 21, 2016, leaving a voicemail requesting the status report.

Mr. Bush did not respond.

A second attempt to contact him by telephone on November 28, 2016, was also unsuccessful. On November 30, 2016, the Special Master issued an Order to Show Cause, directing Mr.

Bush to file a status report or otherwise demonstrate why his case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, by January 17, 2017. The order explicitly stated that failure to respond would result in dismissal.

Mr. Bush did not file the required status report, nor did he contact the court to indicate his intention to continue prosecuting the case.

He never contacted chambers or otherwise responded to the court's orders. The Special Master noted that it is the petitioner's responsibility to prosecute their case and comply with court orders, citing Tsekouras v.

Sec'y, HHS and Sapharas v. Sec'y, HHS, as well as Vaccine Rule 21(b).

Consequently, the case was dismissed on February 23, 2017, for failure to prosecute and failure to follow court orders. The clerk was directed to enter judgment accordingly.

The public decision was reissued for publication on February 23, 2017.

Theory of causation

Petitioner Roy Bush filed a petition on May 11, 2015, alleging injury from a vaccine listed on the Vaccine Injury Table. The specific vaccine, vaccination date, and alleged injury are not detailed in the provided public text. The case was dismissed on February 23, 2017, by Special Master Mindy Michaels Roth for failure to prosecute and failure to follow court orders, after the petitioner failed to respond to court communications and orders, including an Order to Show Cause. The petitioner was initially represented by counsel, who was relieved on August 2, 2016. The petitioner stated he was seeking new counsel but did not file required status reports. No specific theory of causation, medical experts, or evidence regarding the alleged injury or its link to vaccination was presented or discussed in the public decision, as the dismissal was procedural. The outcome was dismissal.

Source PDFs 2 total · 1 downloaded