Julia Telonidis v. HHS - Hepatitis A, shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) (2018)

Filed 2015-05-04Decided 2018-02-05Vaccine Hepatitis A
compensated$175,000

Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]

Julia Telonidis filed a petition for compensation on May 4, 2015, alleging that a hepatitis A vaccination administered on October 19, 2012, caused her to suffer a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA). The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit.

On September 1, 2015, the respondent filed a Rule 4(c) report conceding that the petitioner's alleged injury was consistent with SIRVA and was caused-in-fact by the vaccine received on October 19, 2012. The respondent also stated that no other causes for the petitioner's SIRVA were identified and that the injury and its sequelae persisted for more than six months after vaccination.

Based on the respondent's concession and the evidence, Special Master Denise Kathryn Vowell issued a ruling on entitlement on September 2, 2015, finding Julia Telonidis entitled to compensation. Subsequently, on August 30, 2017, the respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation, proposing an award of $175,000.00, which the petitioner agreed to.

Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey issued a decision on February 5, 2018, awarding Julia Telonidis a lump sum payment of $175,000.00, representing compensation for all damages available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). The public decision does not describe the specific onset of symptoms, medical examinations, diagnostic tests, or treatments.

Petitioner was represented by Ronald Homer of Conway, Homer & Chin-Caplan, and later Conway, Homer, P.C. Respondent was represented by Michael Milmoe, and later Darryl R.

Wishard, of the U.S. Department of Justice.

Theory of causation

Petitioner Julia Telonidis received a hepatitis A vaccine on October 19, 2012. She alleged this vaccine caused a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA). The respondent conceded causation-in-fact for SIRVA, stating the injury was consistent with SIRVA, caused by the vaccine, and persisted for over six months with no other identified causes. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit. Special Master Denise Kathryn Vowell issued a ruling on entitlement on September 2, 2015, finding petitioner entitled to compensation. On August 30, 2017, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation, proposing $175,000.00, which petitioner accepted. Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey issued a decision on February 5, 2018, awarding a lump sum of $175,000.00. The public decision does not detail the specific mechanism of injury, expert testimony, or diagnostic findings. Petitioner was represented by Ronald Homer, and respondent by Michael Milmoe and Darryl R. Wishard.

Source PDFs 3 total · 2 downloaded