VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_15-vv-00404 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_15-vv-00404 Petitioner: Dvora Ghitza Filed: 2015-04-22 Decided: 2016-09-21 Vaccine: Td Vaccination date: 2012-05-17 Condition: brachial neuritis Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 102000 AI-assisted case summary: Dvora Ghitza filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, alleging that a tetanus-diphtheria (Td) vaccination on May 17, 2012, caused her to suffer from brachial neuritis. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit. Respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, filed a Rule 4(c) report conceding that Ms. Ghitza was entitled to compensation. The respondent stated that her brachial neuritis met the criteria of the Vaccine Injury Table, as it manifested between two and twenty-eight days after vaccination and there was no preponderant evidence of an unrelated cause. The respondent also confirmed that the condition persisted for more than six months and that Ms. Ghitza satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation. A ruling on entitlement was issued on July 14, 2015, finding her entitled to compensation. Subsequently, on January 4, 2016, the respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation, recommending an award of $102,000.00, which Ms. Ghitza agreed to. The Chief Special Master issued a decision awarding Ms. Ghitza a lump sum payment of $102,000.00, representing compensation for all damages available under the Vaccine Act. Theory of causation field: Table Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_15-vv-00404-0 Date issued/filed: 2015-08-05 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 07/14/2015) regarding 14 Ruling on Entitlement ( Signed by Chief Special Master Denise Kathryn Vowell.)(mpj) Copy to parties. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:15-vv-00404-UNJ Document 16 Filed 08/05/15 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-404V Filed: July 14, 2015 Unpublished * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * DVORA GHITZA, * * Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; * Tentanus-diphtheria (“Td”); Brachial * Neuritis; Special Processing Unit SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“SPU”) AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Ronald Homer, Conway, Homer, & Chin-Caplan, P.C., for petitioner. Amy Kokot, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 Vowell, Chief Special Master: On April 22, 2015, Dvora Ghitza filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 [the “Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. Petitioner alleges that as a result of a tetanus diphtheria [“Td”] vaccination on May 17, 2012, she suffered a neurological injury. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit [“SPU”] of the Office of Special Masters. On July 13, 2015, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) report in which she concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1, 5. Specifically, respondent indicates that petitioner is entitled to a presumption of causation because petitioner’s left-sided brachial neuritis meets the criteria of the Vaccine Injury Table, 1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:15-vv-00404-UNJ Document 16 Filed 08/05/15 Page 2 of 2 42 C.F.R. § 100.3. Specifically, petitioner’s brachial neuritis manifested between two and twenty-eight days after her receipt of the Td vaccination, and there is not preponderant evidence that her condition was due to a factor unrelated to the vaccine. Id. at 5. Respondent further indicates that “petitioner’s brachial neuritis and its sequela persisted for more than six months” and that “petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Vaccine Act.” Id. at 5. In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, I find that petitioner is entitled to compensation. s/Denise K. Vowell Denise K. Vowell Chief Special Master ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_15-vv-00404-1 Date issued/filed: 2016-09-21 Pages: 4 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 01/06/2016) regarding 25 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer (Signed by Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey.)(mpj) Copy to parties. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:15-vv-00404-UNJ Document 40 Filed 09/21/16 Page 1 of 4 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-404V Filed: January 6, 2016 Unpublished * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * DVORA GHITZA, * * Petitioner, * Damages Decision Based on Proffer; * Tetanus-diphtheria (“Td”) Vaccination; * Brachial Neuritis; Special Unit SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Processing (“SPU”) AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Ronald Craig Homer, Conway, Homer, & Chin-Caplan, P.C., Boston, MA, for petitioner. Amy Paula Kokot, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 Dorsey, Chief Special Master: On April 22, 2015, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 [the “Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. Petitioner alleges that as a result of a tetanus diphtheria [“Td”] vaccination on May 17, 2012, she suffered a neurological injury. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On July 14, 2015, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled to compensation for brachial neuritis. On January 4, 2016, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation [“Proffer”] indicating petitioner should be awarded $102,000.00. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. 1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:15-vv-00404-UNJ Document 40 Filed 09/21/16 Page 2 of 4 Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards petitioner a lump sum payment of $102,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Dvora Ghitza. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 300aa-15(a). The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 CCaassee 11::1155--vvvv--0000440044--UUNNJJ DDooccuummeenntt 2440 FFiilleedd 0019//0241//1166 PPaaggee 13 ooff 24 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ) DVORA GHITZA, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) No. 15-404V (ECF) v. ) Chief Special Master Dorsey ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ) RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION I. Compensation for Vaccine Injury-Related Items On July 14, 2015, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding that petitioner was entitled to vaccine compensation for her brachial neuritis. Based on the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $102,000.00. This amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees. II. Form of the Award Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner be made through a lump sum payment of $102,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.1 Petitioner agrees. Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. 1 Should petitioner die prior to the entry of judgment, respondent reserves the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future pain and suffering, and future lost wages. 1 CCaassee 11::1155--vvvv--0000440044--UUNNJJ DDooccuummeenntt 2440 FFiilleedd 0019//0241//1166 PPaaggee 24 ooff 24 Respectfully submitted, BENJAMIN C. MIZER Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General RUPA BHATTACHARYYA Director Torts Branch, Civil Division VINCENT J. MATANOSKI Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division MICHAEL P. MILMOE Senior Trial Counsel Torts Branch, Civil Division s/Amy P. Kokot AMY P. KOKOT Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044-0146 Tel.: (202) 616-4118 Dated: January 4, 2016 2