VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_14-vv-01035 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_14-vv-01035 Petitioner: Razene Lewis Filed: 2014-10-24 Decided: 2018-08-20 Vaccine: tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis Vaccination date: 2012-10-24 Condition: brachial neuritis Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 1861209 AI-assisted case summary: Razene Lewis filed a petition on October 24, 2014, alleging that a tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine she received on October 24, 2012, caused her to develop brachial neuritis. The Secretary of Health and Human Services initially argued that Ms. Lewis did not meet the criteria for a Table claim because her shoulder pain began either the same day or the next day after vaccination. However, the court found that Ms. Lewis's shoulder pain began approximately six days after the vaccination, on October 30, 2012. This onset timing satisfied the Vaccine Injury Table criteria for brachial neuritis, which can develop within 2-28 days after a tetanus vaccine. The Secretary conceded that Ms. Lewis suffered from brachial neuritis, that her symptoms lasted longer than six months, and did not identify any unrelated cause. Consequently, the court granted entitlement to compensation. Following the entitlement ruling, the parties negotiated a damages award. On August 20, 2018, the court awarded Ms. Lewis a total of $1,861,209.52. This amount included $215,696.21 for first-year life care expenses, $1,612,179.00 for lost earnings, and $33,334.31 for past unreimbursable expenses. Additionally, an annuity was to be purchased to cover future life care expenses as outlined in a joint life care plan. Theory of causation field: Table Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_14-vv-01035-0 Date issued/filed: 2015-11-16 Pages: 5 Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 10/13/2015) regarding 32 Ruling on Entitlement. Signed by Special Master Christian J. Moran. (tpj) Copy to parties. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:14-vv-01035-UNJ Document 35 Filed 11/16/15 Page 1 of 5 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * RAZENE LEWIS, * * No. 14-1035 Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran * v. * * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Filed: October 13, 2015 AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Entitlement, onset of shoulder pain, Respondent. * Table injury, brachial neuritis * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Richard Gage, Richard Gage, P.C., Cheyenne Wyoming, for petitioner; Darryl R. Wishard, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. Ruling Finding Facts and Granting Entitlement1 The parties dispute when Razene Lewis, the petitioner, first experienced problems with her shoulder. The resolution of this issue is in Ms. Lewis’s favor and, is therefore a basis for finding that she is entitled to compensation. Procedural History Represented by her first attorney, Ms. Lewis filed her petition on October 24, 2014. Ms. Lewis filed some medical records and two affidavits with her petition. She filed additional medical records later. After a change in counsel, Ms. Lewis filed an amended petition on July 17, 2015. She alleged that she received a tetanus vaccine on October 24, 2012, and 1 The E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 2002), requires that the Court post this ruling on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website. Case 1:14-vv-01035-UNJ Document 35 Filed 11/16/15 Page 2 of 5 later developed brachial neuritis. Am. Pet. at ¶ 9. She sought compensation pursuant to the Vaccine Injury Table. See 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a) ¶ I.B. (associating tetanus vaccines with branchial neuritis that develops 2-28 days after vaccination). On July 28, 2015, the Secretary filed her report pursuant to Vaccine Rule 4. The Secretary argued that Ms. Lewis did not establish the elements of a table claim because the medical records showed that she experienced shoulder pain either the day she was vaccinated or the next day. Resp’t’s Rep. at 6. Otherwise, the Secretary conceded that Ms. Lewis received a tetanus vaccine, suffered brachial neuritis, and that her symptoms have lasted longer than six months. Id. The Secretary also represented that she did not identify any factor unrelated to the vaccine as the cause of Ms. Lewis’s brachial neuritis. Id. On September 12, 2015, Ms. Lewis filed a second affidavit. She also filed a memorandum arguing that the onset of her shoulder pain occurred at least two days after the tetanus vaccination. Pet. Mem. at 3. On September 24, 2015, a status conference was held. Neither party requested a hearing at which witnesses could testify. Both parties agreed that the matter is ready for adjudication. Standards for Adjudication By now, the standards for adjudicating factual issues, like when symptoms first began, are well-defined. For an extensive discussion, see Bayless v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., No. 08-679V, 2015 WL 638197 at *2-3 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Jan. 15, 2015). Findings of Fact The undisputed facts frame the dispute. On October 24, 2012, Ms. Lewis was pregnant and went to a hospital to give birth. Exhibit 2 at 24. She was admitted at approximately 10:30 AM, and gave birth to a baby girl later that day. Exhibit 2 at 22, 98. Later on, at approximately 11:00 PM, still on October 24, 2012, Ms. Lewis received two vaccines: an influenza vaccine in her right deltoid and a tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine in her left deltoid. Exhibit 2 at 2 Case 1:14-vv-01035-UNJ Document 35 Filed 11/16/15 Page 3 of 5 37, 63, 85-86, 109.2 Ms. Lewis was discharged from the hospital on October 26, 2012. Id. at 109. On November 1, 2012, Ms. Lewis saw her obstetrician-gynecologist, Leonard G. Blanton, for a postpartum visit. Exhibit 3 at 99. She complained about neck pain. Id. On exam, she could not raise her arm above her head. Id. Dr. Blanton did not record any information about when the pain started. He referred her to a neurologist, Sanjeevi C. Tivakaran. Exhibit 4 at 1. Thus, the narrow issue is when did Ms. Lewis’s shoulder pain begin? In this litigation, Ms. Lewis submitted an affidavit stating she experienced burning and soreness at the injection site. Exhibit 11 at ¶ 5.3 Over the next few days, however, Ms. Lewis’s pain changed. Exhibit 11 at ¶ 6. She dates the onset of the pain associated with brachial neuritis to several days after the tetanus vaccination. In the Secretary’s view of the evidence, Ms. Lewis’s pain started either the same day or the next day following the vaccination. Resp’t’s Rep. at 6. The basis for this view is that in Ms. Lewis’s first visit to Dr. Tivakaran, he recorded: “Onset was on 10/25/2012.” Exhibit 4 at 1. In addition, Dr. Tivakaran wrote: “patient states after the injection on October 25[,] she felt a burning sensation and soreness in the left deltoid area. . . . Then she started experiencing constant discomfort in 2 As discussed below, later histories mistakenly report the date of vaccination as October 25, 2012. 3 When Ms. Lewis's first attorney represented her, she submitted an affidavit with the petition. Ms. Lewis's October 23, 2014 affidavit talks about pain in her neck and shoulder that she reported to Dr. Blanton on November 1, 2012. This affidavit does not say anything about onset. Exhibit 6. It appears that in the Rule 4 Report, the Secretary confused Ms. Lewis's affidavit, exhibit 6, with another affidavit which came from Dr. Tivakaran, exhibit 5. See Resp’t’s Rep. at 2, but see id. at 5 (correctly attributing exhibit 5 to Dr. Tivakaran). Dr. Tivakaran averred: "After the injection on October 25, Ms. Lewis felt a burning sensation and soreness in the left deltoid area. The pain started getting worse over the next few days. It was a deep aching pain like muscle soreness along with some burning sensation." Exhibit 5 at ¶ 3. He also stated that the symptoms of Ms. Lewis's brachial neuritis "began within 2-28 days following the DTAP vaccine." Id. at ¶ 5. 3 Case 1:14-vv-01035-UNJ Document 35 Filed 11/16/15 Page 4 of 5 the left side of the neck and in the last 2 days some pain and discomfort in the right deltoid area.” Exhibit 4 at 1.4 Taken as a whole, the evidence preponderates in Ms. Lewis’s favor. Under the Secretary’s view, she started having significant pain in her shoulder while in the hospital. Yet, the hospital records do not mention any shoulder pain.5 Rather, the hospital records indicate that Ms. Lewis did not have any complaints. Exhibit 2 at 23 (discharge report stating no complaints on postpartum day 2), 49 (hand written notes), 127-49 (nurse’s notes). Special masters have often reasoned that the omission of a complaint in a medical record supports an inference that the problem did not exist. Here, that reasoning is especially sound because Ms. Lewis was in the presence of medical personnel. If she were experiencing significant shoulder pain, then she would have told one of the doctors or nurses periodically checking on her. In addition, the record on which the Secretary relies, the November 6, 2012 report from Dr. Tivakaran, is inaccurate itself. It states Ms. Lewis was vaccinated on October 25, 2012. Exhibit 4 at 1. However the tetanus vaccine was actually on October 24, 2012. This error indicates that Ms. Lewis was not providing an accurate history and is a further reason for not crediting this aspect of Dr. Tivakaran’s report. For these reasons, it is determined that Ms. Lewis’s significant shoulder pain started on approximately October 30, 2012. Exhibit 11 at ¶ 7. Based on this finding for onset and other information in the record, Ms. Lewis has established the prima facie elements of a Table claim. The Secretary has not identified another cause for Ms. Lewis’s brachial neuritis. Thus, Ms. Lewis is entitled to compensation. A damages order will issue shortly. 4 The November 6, 2012 history appears to be repeated in other notes created by Dr. Tivakaran. There is no indication that these later histories were based upon independent interviews. 5 The Rule 4 Report intimates that Ms. Lewis received Motrin for the shoulder pain she was experiencing. However, a doctor seems to have ordered Motrin as part of routine postpartum care. Exhibit 2 at 39-42 (orders on October 24, 2012, at 5:00 PM), 109. 4 Case 1:14-vv-01035-UNJ Document 35 Filed 11/16/15 Page 5 of 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Christian J. Moran Christian J. Moran Special Master 5 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_14-vv-01035-1 Date issued/filed: 2018-08-20 Pages: 12 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 7/23/18) regarding 125 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer. Signed by Special Master Christian J. Moran. (MRG) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:14-vv-01035-UNJ Document 131 Filed 08/20/18 Page 1 of 12 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * RAZENE LEWIS, * * No. 14-1035V Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran * v. * Filed: July 23, 2018 * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Damages; decision based on proffer; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus vaccine; * brachial neuritis. Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Richard Gage, Richard Gage, P.C., Cheyenne, WY, for Petitioner; Darryl R. Wishard, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. UNPUBLISHED DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 On October 24, 2014, Razene Lewis filed a petition seeking compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 et seq., alleging that the diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus vaccination she received on October 25, 2012, caused her to suffer brachial neuritis. On October 13, 2015, the undersigned determined that Ms. Lewis is entitled to compensation under the Vaccine Act. Following the ruling on entitlement, the parties began working towards reaching resolution of Ms. Lewis’s damages award. The parties were able to reach an agreement on a joint life care plan (exhibit E). The costs associated with this agreed-upon life care plan are attached to this decision as Appendix A. In addition, on July 31, 2017, special master George Hastings entered an interim 1 The E-Government Act, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website. Case 1:14-vv-01035-UNJ Document 131 Filed 08/20/18 Page 2 of 12 award of $250,000.00 in damages for Ms. Lewis’s pain and suffering. Thus Ms. Lewis is not entitled to any additional compensation for her pain and suffering. 42 U.S.C. §300aa-15(a)(4). The parties disputed Ms. Lewis’s compensation for lost earnings and actual unreimbursable expenses. A hearing was held on November 17, 2017. Based on the findings from that hearing, issued on November 21, 2017, the parties agreed on an award of $1,612,179.00 for Ms. Lewis’s lost earnings, however additional evidence was necessary for calculating Ms. Lewis’s actual unreimbursable expenses. That evidence was entered into the record in the months following the hearing and the undersigned issued a supplemental findings of fact on June 28, 2018. Based on those findings of fact, the parties agreed to an award of $33,334.31 for Ms. Lewis’s actual unreimbursable expenses. On July 11, 2018, respondent filed a Proffer on Award of Compensation, to which petitioner agrees.2 Based upon the record as a whole, the undersigned finds the proffer reasonable and that the petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the attached Proffer, attached as Appendix B, the court awards petitioner: 1. A lump sum payment of $1,861,209.52 representing compensation for life care expenses expected to be incurred during the first year after judgment ($215,696.21), lost earnings ($1,612,179.00), and past unreimbursable expenses ($33,334.31), in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Razene Lewis; and 2. An amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract, subject to the conditions described in the attached Proffer (attached as Appendix B), that will provide payments for the life care items contained in the life care plan, as illustrated by the chart (attached as Appendix A), paid to the life insurance company from which the annuity will be purchased. Compensation for Year Two (beginning on the first anniversary of the date of judgment) and all subsequent years shall be provided through respondent’s purchase of an annuity, which annuity shall make payments directly to petitioner, Razene Lewis, only so long as Razene Lewis is alive at the time a particular payment is due. At the Secretary’s sole discretion, the periodic payments may be provided to 2 The petitioner has noted that she may challenge, on appeal, the factual findings that served as a basis for the loss of future earnings calculation contained in the Proffer. Case 1:14-vv-01035-UNJ Document 131 Filed 08/20/18 Page 3 of 12 petitioner in monthly, quarterly, annual, or other installments. The “annual amounts” set forth in the chart in Appendix A describe only the total yearly sum to be paid to petitioner and do not require that the payment be made in one annual installment. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, the clerk is directed to enter judgment in case 14-1035V according to this decision and the attached proffer.3 Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Matthew Ginther, at (202) 357-6360. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Christian J. Moran Christian J. Moran Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge. CCaassee 11::1144--vvvv--0011003355--UUNNJJ DDooccuummeenntt 112341- 1 F iFleilde d0 80/72/01/11/81 8 P aPgaeg e4 1o fo 1f 24 Appendix A: Items of Compensation for Razene Lewis Page 1 of 4 Lump Sum Compensation Compensation Compensation Compensation Compensation Compensation Compensation Compensation ITEMS OF COMPENSATION G.R * M Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Years 4-5 Years 6-10 Year 11 Year 12 Years 13-17 2018 2019 2020 2021-2022 2023-2027 2028 2029 2030-2034 Insurance MOP 5% 6,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 Medicare Part B Premium 5% M Medicare Part B Deductible 5% * Medicare Supp F Premium 5% M Medicare Supp F Deductible 5% Medicare Part D 5% M Neurologist 5% * Mileage: Neurologist 4% 68.40 68.40 68.40 68.40 68.40 68.40 68.40 68.40 Lab Studies 5% * EMG 5% * PCP 5% * Mileage: PCP 4% 20.52 20.52 20.52 20.52 20.52 20.52 20.52 20.52 Pain Mngt 5% * Mileage: Pain Mngt 4% 118.08 118.08 118.08 118.08 118.08 118.08 118.08 118.08 Interventional Pain Mngt 5% * Psychiatrist 5% * Mileage: Psychiatrist 4% 39.60 39.60 39.60 39.60 39.60 39.60 39.60 39.60 Plastic Surgeon: Brachial Plexus 5% * Mileage: Plastic Surgeon 4% 102.60 PT Eval or OT Eval 4% * Mileage: PT Eval or OT Eval 4% 18.72 18.72 18.72 18.72 18.72 18.72 18.72 18.72 PT or OT 4% * Mileage: PT or OT 4% 168.48 168.48 168.48 168.48 168.48 168.48 168.48 168.48 Massage Therapy 4% M 4,159.48 2,079.74 1,439.82 1,439.82 1,439.82 1,439.82 1,439.82 1,439.82 Mileage: Massage Therapy 4% M 1,010.88 505.44 349.92 349.92 349.92 349.92 349.92 349.92 Flexeril 5% * Lyrica 5% * Cymbalta 5% * Ibuprofen 4% 20.44 20.44 20.44 20.44 20.44 20.44 20.44 20.44 Percocet 5% * Zofran 5% * Flector Patch 5% * Senokot 4% 18.25 18.25 18.25 18.25 18.25 18.25 18.25 18.25 Essential Oils 4% 1,805.86 1,805.86 1,805.86 1,805.86 1,805.86 1,805.86 1,805.86 1,805.86 Adj Bed 4% 3,948.00 3,948.00 CCaassee 11::1144--vvvv--0011003355--UUNNJJ DDooccuummeenntt 112341- 1 F iFleilde d0 80/72/01/11/81 8 P aPgaeg e5 2o fo 1f 24 Appendix A: Items of Compensation for Razene Lewis Page 2 of 4 Lump Sum Compensation Compensation Compensation Compensation Compensation Compensation Compensation Compensation ITEMS OF COMPENSATION G.R * M Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Years 4-5 Years 6-10 Year 11 Year 12 Years 13-17 2018 2019 2020 2021-2022 2023-2027 2028 2029 2030-2034 Shower Chair 4% 54.98 9.16 9.16 9.16 9.16 9.16 9.16 9.16 Long Handled Loofah 4% 58.32 58.32 58.32 58.32 58.32 58.32 58.32 58.32 Long Handled Hair Brush 4% 13.98 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 Swivel Spnge Lotion Applicator 4% 9.79 2.45 2.45 2.45 2.45 2.45 2.45 2.45 Repl Sponges 4% 56.34 56.34 56.34 56.34 56.34 56.34 56.34 56.34 Reacher 4% 24.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Large Grip Utensils 4% 78.98 13.16 13.16 13.16 13.16 13.16 13.16 13.16 Dragon Speak 4% 95.00 31.67 31.67 31.67 31.67 31.67 31.67 31.67 Dressing Stick 4% 8.48 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 Button/ Zipper Pull 4% 13.65 2.73 2.73 2.73 2.73 2.73 2.73 2.73 Power Drive Spinning Reel 4% 514.99 103.00 103.00 103.00 103.00 103.00 103.00 103.00 Knot Tier 4% 17.00 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 Laser Hair Removal 4% 1,650.00 725.00 362.50 362.50 362.50 362.50 362.50 Counseling 4% * Mileage: Counseling 4% M 635.04 317.52 211.68 Case Mngt 4% M 1,920.00 1,920.00 1,920.00 1,920.00 Home Mods 0% 76,000.00 Bruno Seat 4% 9,777.90 9,777.90 Seat Belt Helper 4% 6.95 1.74 1.74 1.74 1.74 1.74 1.74 1.74 A/S: Maid Service 4% M 5,200.00 5,200.00 5,200.00 5,200.00 5,200.00 5,200.00 5,200.00 5,200.00 A/S: Lawn Maint 4% M 1,837.50 1,837.50 1,837.50 1,837.50 1,837.50 1,837.50 1,837.50 1,837.50 A/S: Heavy Yard Clean Up 4% 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 Life Alert 4% 444.00 444.00 444.00 444.00 444.00 444.00 444.00 444.00 Non Skilled Care 4% M 99,280.00 99,280.00 86,870.00 86,870.00 86,870.00 86,870.00 86,870.00 55,845.00 Lost Earnings 1,612,179.00 Actual Unreimbursable Expenses 33,334.31 Annual Totals 1,861,209.52 120,651.73 108,065.45 107,491.27 105,571.27 119,297.17 105,571.27 74,546.27 Note: Compensation Year 1 consists of the 12 month period following the date of judgment. Compensation Year 2 consists of the 12 month period commencing on the first anniversary of the date of judgment. As soon as practicable after entry of judgment, respondent shall make the following payment to petitioner for Yr 1 life care expenses ($215,696.21), lost earnings ($1,612,179.00), and actual unreimbursable expenses ($33,334.31): $1,861,209.52. Annual amounts payable through an annuity for future Compensation Years follow the anniversary of the date of judgment. Annual amounts shall increase at the rates indicated above in column G.R., compounded annually from the date of judgment. Items denoted with an asterisk (*) covered by health insurance and/or Medicare. Items denoted with an "M" payable in twelve monthly installments totaling the annual amount indicated. CCaassee 11::1144--vvvv--0011003355--UUNNJJ DDooccuummeenntt 112341- 1 F iFleilde d0 80/72/01/11/81 8 P aPgaeg e6 3o fo 1f 24 Appendix A: Items of Compensation for Razene Lewis Page 3 of 4 Compensation Compensation Compensation Compensation Compensation ITEMS OF COMPENSATION G.R * M Years 18-20 Year 21 Years 22-28 Years 29-36 Years 37-Life 2035-2037 2038 2039-2045 2046-2053 2054-Life Insurance MOP 5% 6,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 Medicare Part B Premium 5% M 1,608.00 1,608.00 Medicare Part B Deductible 5% * Medicare Supp F Premium 5% M 1,946.76 1,946.76 Medicare Supp F Deductible 5% 2,240.00 2,240.00 Medicare Part D 5% M 4,729.53 4,729.53 Neurologist 5% * Mileage: Neurologist 4% 68.40 68.40 68.40 68.40 68.40 Lab Studies 5% * EMG 5% * PCP 5% * Mileage: PCP 4% 20.52 20.52 20.52 20.52 20.52 Pain Mngt 5% * Mileage: Pain Mngt 4% 118.08 118.08 118.08 118.08 118.08 Interventional Pain Mngt 5% * Psychiatrist 5% * Mileage: Psychiatrist 4% 39.60 39.60 39.60 39.60 39.60 Plastic Surgeon: Brachial Plexus 5% * Mileage: Plastic Surgeon 4% PT Eval or OT Eval 4% * Mileage: PT Eval or OT Eval 4% 18.72 18.72 18.72 18.72 18.72 PT or OT 4% * Mileage: PT or OT 4% 168.48 168.48 168.48 168.48 168.48 Massage Therapy 4% M 1,439.82 1,439.82 1,439.82 1,439.82 1,439.82 Mileage: Massage Therapy 4% M 349.92 349.92 349.92 349.92 349.92 Flexeril 5% * Lyrica 5% * Cymbalta 5% * Ibuprofen 4% 20.44 20.44 20.44 20.44 20.44 Percocet 5% * Zofran 5% * Flector Patch 5% * Senokot 4% 18.25 18.25 18.25 18.25 18.25 Essential Oils 4% 1,805.86 1,805.86 1,805.86 1,805.86 1,805.86 Adj Bed 4% 3,948.00 394.80 394.80 394.80 CCaassee 11::1144--vvvv--0011003355--UUNNJJ DDooccuummeenntt 112341- 1 F iFleilde d0 80/72/01/11/81 8 P aPgaeg e7 4o fo 1f 24 Appendix A: Items of Compensation for Razene Lewis Page 4 of 4 Compensation Compensation Compensation Compensation Compensation ITEMS OF COMPENSATION G.R * M Years 18-20 Year 21 Years 22-28 Years 29-36 Years 37-Life 2035-2037 2038 2039-2045 2046-2053 2054-Life Shower Chair 4% 9.16 9.16 9.16 9.16 9.16 Long Handled Loofah 4% 58.32 58.32 58.32 58.32 58.32 Long Handled Hair Brush 4% 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 Swivel Spnge Lotion Applicator 4% 2.45 2.45 2.45 2.45 2.45 Repl Sponges 4% 56.34 56.34 56.34 56.34 56.34 Reacher 4% 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Large Grip Utensils 4% 13.16 13.16 13.16 13.16 13.16 Dragon Speak 4% 31.67 31.67 31.67 31.67 31.67 Dressing Stick 4% 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 Button/ Zipper Pull 4% 2.73 2.73 2.73 2.73 2.73 Power Drive Spinning Reel 4% 103.00 103.00 103.00 103.00 103.00 Knot Tier 4% 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 Laser Hair Removal 4% 362.50 362.50 145.00 145.00 145.00 Counseling 4% * Mileage: Counseling 4% M Case Mngt 4% M Home Mods 0% Bruno Seat 4% 9,777.90 977.79 977.79 977.79 Seat Belt Helper 4% 1.74 1.74 1.74 1.74 1.74 A/S: Maid Service 4% M 2,600.00 2,600.00 2,600.00 2,600.00 2,600.00 A/S: Lawn Maint 4% M 1,837.50 1,837.50 1,837.50 1,837.50 A/S: Heavy Yard Clean Up 4% 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 Life Alert 4% 444.00 444.00 444.00 444.00 444.00 Non Skilled Care 4% M 55,845.00 55,845.00 55,845.00 55,845.00 55,845.00 Lost Earnings Actual Unreimbursable Expenses Annual Totals 71,946.27 85,672.17 73,101.36 77,625.65 75,288.15 Note: Compensation Year 1 consists of the 12 month period following the date of judgment. Compensation Year 2 consists of the 12 month period commencing on the first anniversary of the date of judgment. As soon as practicable after entry of judgment, respondent shall make the following payment to petitioner for Yr 1 life care expenses ($215,696.21), lost earnings ($1,612,179.00), and actual unreimbursable expenses ($33,334.31): $1,861,209.52. Annual amounts payable through an annuity for future Compensation Years follow the anniversary of the date of judgment. Annual amounts shall increase at the rates indicated above in column G.R., compounded annually from the date of judgment. Items denoted with an asterisk (*) covered by health insurance and/or Medicare. Items denoted with an "M" payable in twelve monthly installments totaling the annual amount indicated. CCaassee 1 1:1:144--vvvv--0011003355--UUNNJJ D Dooccuummeennt t1 13214 F Filieledd 0 087/2/101/1/188 P Paaggee 8 1 o of f1 52 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ____________________________________ ) RAZENE LEWIS, ) ECF ) Petitioner, ) No. 14-1035V ) Special Master Moran v. ) ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ) RESPONDENT'S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION I. Items of Compensation A. Life Care Items Respondent engaged life care planner Shelly Kinney, MSN, RN, CCM, CNLCP and petitioner engaged Tresa Johnson, RN, BSN, CNLCP to provide an estimation of Razene Lewis’s future vaccine-injury-related needs. A life care plan was previously filed in this case, and the agreed-upon life care items are illustrated by the chart entitled “Appendix A: Items of Compensation for Razene Lewis,” attached to this proffer as Tab A.1 Respondent proffers that Razene Lewis should be awarded all life care items of compensation illustrated by the chart attached at Tab A. Petitioner agrees. B. Lost Earnings On November 21, 2017, the Special Master issued his Findings of Fact Relating to Lost Earnings in which he ordered the parties to prepare revised statements of lost earnings consistent with specific criteria set forth in the Order. On February 1, 2018, respondent filed a status report 1 The chart at Tab A illustrates the annual benefits provided by the life care plan. The annual benefit years run from the date of judgment up to the first anniversary of the date of judgment, and every year thereafter up to the anniversary of the date of judgment. -1- CCaassee 1 1:1:144--vvvv--0011003355--UUNNJJ D Dooccuummeennt t1 13214 F Filieledd 0 087/2/101/1/188 P Paaggee 9 2 o of f1 52 indicating acceptance of petitioner’s economist’s assessment of $1,612,179.00 for petitioner’s lost earnings, as based on the Special Master’s Order. At a status conference held on February 21, 2018, and noted in the Special Master’s February 23, 2018 Order, “…petitioner stated that while she agrees with the calculation, she reserves her right to challenge, on appeal, the factual findings that served as a basis for the loss of future earnings calculation.” C. Pain and Suffering On July 31, 2017, Special Master Hastings issued a Decision Granting an Interim Award of Damages, awarding pain and suffering in the amount of $250,000.00. This item of compensation has been paid. Therefore, respondent proffers that petitioner is not entitled to any additional compensation for pain and suffering under 42 U.S.C. §300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees. D. Actual Unreimbursable Expenses On June 28, 2018, the Special Master issued his Findings of Fact Relating to Actual Unreimbursable Expenses, awarding actual unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $33,334.31. Respondent proffers $33,334.31 for actual unreimbursable expenses. Petitioner agrees. E. Medicaid Lien Petitioner represents that there are no Medicaid liens outstanding against her. II. Form of the Award The parties recommend that the compensation provided to Razene Lewis should be made through a combination of lump sum payments and future annuity payments as described below, and request that the Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following:2 2 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses and future lost earnings. -2- CCaasese 1 1:1:144-v-vv-v0-011003355-U-UNNJ J D Doocucummeennt 1t 13214 F Fileiledd 0 087/2/101/1/188 P Paaggee 1 30 ooff 512 A. A lump sum payment of $1,861,209.52, representing compensation for life care expenses expected to be incurred during the first year after judgment ($215,696.21), lost earnings ($1,612,179.00), and actual unreimbursable expenses ($33,334.31), in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Razene Lewis. B. An amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract,3 subject to the conditions described below, that will provide payments for the life care items contained in the life care plan, as illustrated by the chart at Tab A, attached hereto, paid to the life insurance company4 from which the annuity will be purchased.5 Compensation for Year Two (beginning on the first anniversary of the date of judgment) and all subsequent years shall be provided through respondent’s purchase of an annuity, which annuity shall make payments directly to petitioner, Razene Lewis, only so long as Razene Lewis is alive at the time a particular payment is due. At the Secretary’s sole discretion, the periodic payments may be provided to petitioner in monthly, quarterly, annual or other installments. The “annual amounts” set forth in the chart at Tab A describe only the total yearly sum to be paid to petitioner and do not require that the payment be made in one annual installment. 3 In respondent’s discretion, respondent may purchase one or more annuity contracts from one or more life insurance companies. 4 The Life Insurance Company must have a minimum of $250,000,000 capital and surplus, exclusive of any mandatory security valuation reserve. The Life Insurance Company must have one of the following ratings from two of the following rating organizations: a. A.M. Best Company: A++, A+, A+g, A+p, A+r, or A+s; b. Moody's Investor Service Claims Paying Rating: Aa3, Aa2, Aa1, or Aaa; c. Standard and Poor's Corporation Insurer Claims-Paying Ability Rating: AA-, AA, AA+, or AAA; d. Fitch Credit Rating Company, Insurance Company Claims Paying Ability Rating: AA-, AA, AA+, or AAA. 5 Petitioner authorizes the disclosure of certain documents filed by the petitioner in this case consistent with the Privacy Act and the routine uses described in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program System of Records, No. 09-15-0056. -3- CCaasese 1 1:1:144-v-vv-v0-011003355-U-UNNJ J D Doocucummeennt 1t 13214 F Fileiledd 0 087/2/101/1/188 P Paaggee 1 41 ooff 512 1. Growth Rate Respondent proffers that a four percent (4%) growth rate should be applied to all non- medical life care items, and a five percent (5%) growth rate should be applied to all medical life care items. Thus, the benefits illustrated in the chart at Tab A that are to be paid through annuity payments should grow as follows: four percent (4%) compounded annually from the date of judgment for non-medical items, and five percent (5%) compounded annually from the date of judgment for medical items. Petitioner agrees. 2. Life-contingent annuity Petitioner will continue to receive the annuity payments from the Life Insurance Company only so long as she, Razene Lewis, is alive at the time that a particular payment is due. Written notice shall be provided to the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Life Insurance Company within twenty (20) days of Razene Lewis’s death. 3. Guardianship Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. III. Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment A. Lump Sum paid to petitioner, Razene Lewis: $1,861,209.52 B. An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described above in section II.B. Respectfully submitted, CHAD A. READLER Acting Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division CATHARINE E. REEVES Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division -4- CCaasese 1 1:1:144-v-vv-v0-011003355-U-UNNJ J D Doocucummeennt 1t 13214 F Fileiledd 0 087/2/101/1/188 P Paaggee 1 52 ooff 512 HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division /s/Darryl R. Wishard DARRYL R. WISHARD Senior Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U. S. Department of Justice P.O. Box l46, Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Direct dial: (202) 616-4357 Dated: July 11, 2018 -5-