VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_14-vv-00993 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_14-vv-00993 Petitioner: Christina Lokay Filed: 2014-10-15 Decided: 2015-09-30 Vaccine: influenza Vaccination date: 2013-11-19 Condition: shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 130000 AI-assisted case summary: Christina Lokay filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, alleging that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) caused by an influenza vaccine she received on November 19, 2013. The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, conceded entitlement to compensation, agreeing that petitioner's injury was consistent with SIRVA and was caused by the flu vaccine. The respondent also confirmed that the injury lasted for more than six months and no other causes were identified. Based on this concession and the evidence, the Chief Special Master found Christina Lokay entitled to compensation. Subsequently, the parties reached a stipulation for damages, with the respondent proffering an award of $130,000.00. This amount was agreed upon by the petitioner and was intended to cover all elements of compensation available under the Vaccine Act. The court awarded this lump sum payment to Christina Lokay. Later, the parties filed a stipulation for attorney's fees and costs, agreeing upon an award of $16,901.36. This amount was awarded as a lump sum jointly payable to Christina Lokay and her counsel. Theory of causation field: Table Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_14-vv-00993-0 Date issued/filed: 2015-02-24 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 01/12/2015) regarding 16 Ruling on Entitlement (Signed by Chief Special Master Denise Kathryn Vowell.)(mpj) Copy to parties. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:14-vv-00993-UNJ Document 18 Filed 02/24/15 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 14-993V Filed: January 12, 2015 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * CHRISTINA LOKAY, * * Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; * Influenza Vaccine or Flu Vaccine; * Special Processing Unit; Shoulder Injury SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Related to Vaccine Administration; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * SIRVA * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Danielle Strait, Esq., Maglio, Christopher and Toale, PC Washington, DC, for petitioner. Lara Englund, Esq., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC for respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 Vowell, Chief Special Master: On October 15, 2014, Christina Lokay filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq,2 [the “Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury which was caused by the influenza vaccine she received on November 19, 2013. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On January 12, 2015, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) report [“Res. Report”] in which she concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Res. Report at 3. Specifically, respondent believes petitioner’s injury is “consistent with a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA)” and agrees it was caused by the flu vaccine she received on November 19, 2013. Id. Respondent further agrees that 1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2006). Case 1:14-vv-00993-UNJ Document 18 Filed 02/24/15 Page 2 of 2 petitioner’s injury lasted for more than six months and “[n]o other causes for petitioner’s SIRVA were identified.” Id. In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, I find that petitioner is entitled to compensation. s/Denise K. Vowell Denise K. Vowell Chief Special Master 2 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_14-vv-00993-1 Date issued/filed: 2015-06-04 Pages: 4 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 05/14/2015) regarding 25 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer (Signed by Chief Special Master Denise Kathryn Vowell.)(mpj) Copy to parties. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:14-vv-00993-UNJ Document 28 Filed 06/04/15 Page 1 of 4 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 14-993V Filed: May 14, 2015 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * CHRISTINA LOKAY, * * Petitioner, * Damages Decision Based on Proffer; * Influenza or Flu Vaccine; * Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Administration (“SIRVA”); AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Danielle Strait, Esq., Maglio, Christopher and Toale, P.A. (DC) Washington, DC, for petitioner. Lara Englund, Esq., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC for respondent. DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 Vowell, Chief Special Master: On October 15, 2014, Christina Lokay filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 [the “Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury which was caused by the influenza vaccine she received on November 19, 2013. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On January 12, 2015, I issued a ruling on entitlement, finding petitioner entitled to compensation. On May 14, 2015, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation [“Proffer”] indicating petitioner should be awarded $130,000.00. Proffer at 1. According to respondent’s Proffer, petitioner agrees to this proposed amount. Id. 1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2006). Case 1:14-vv-00993-UNJ Document 28 Filed 06/04/15 Page 2 of 4 Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award petitioner a lump sum payment of $130,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Christina Lokay. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 300aa-15(a). The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 s/Denise K. Vowell Denise K. Vowell Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 CCaassee 11::1144--vvvv--0000999933--UUNNJJ DDooccuummeenntt 2248 FFiilleedd 0056//1044//1155 PPaaggee 13 ooff 24 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS CHRISTINA LOKAY, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) No. 14-993V ) Chief Special Master Denise Vowell SECRETARY OF ) HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ) RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION I. Compensation for Vaccine Injury-Related Items Respondent proffers that, based on the evidence of record, petitioner should be awarded $130,000.00. This amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(1); -15(a)(3)(A); and -15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees. II. Form of the Award The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made as lump sum payment of $130,000.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner.1 Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. This amount accounts for all elements of compensation under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) to which petitioner would be entitled. Respectfully submitted, BENJAMIN C. MIZER Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General 1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering, and the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. CCaassee 11::1144--vvvv--0000999933--UUNNJJ DDooccuummeenntt 2248 FFiilleedd 0056//1044//1155 PPaaggee 24 ooff 24 RUPA BHATTACHARYYA Director Torts Branch, Civil Division VINCENT J. MATANOSKI Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division MICHAEL P. MILMOE Senior Trial Counsel Torts Branch, Civil Division s/ LARA A. ENGLUND LARA A. ENGLUND Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington D.C. 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 307-3013 E-mail: lara.a.englund@usdoj.gov Dated: May 14, 2015 2 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 3: USCOURTS-cofc-1_14-vv-00993-2 Date issued/filed: 2015-09-30 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 09/04/2015) regarding 32 DECISION Fees Stipulation/Proffer (Signed by Special Master Denise Kathryn Vowell.)(mpj) Copy to parties. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:14-vv-00993-UNJ Document 35 Filed 09/30/15 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 14-0993V Filed: September 4, 2015 Unpublished * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * CHRSITINA LOKAY, * * Petitioner, * v. * * Attorney Fees and Costs; Stipulation SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND * HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Danielle Strait, Esq., Maglio Christopher and Toale, PA, (DC) Washington, DC, for petitioner. Lara Englund, Esq., US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. DECISION ON ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS1 Vowell, Special Master: On October 15, 2014, Christina Lokay filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 [the “Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury which was caused by the influenza vaccine she received on November 19, 2013. Petition at 1. On May 14, 2015, I issued a decision awarding compensation to petitioner based on respondent’s proffer to which petitioner agreed. 1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioners have 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2006). Case 1:14-vv-00993-UNJ Document 35 Filed 09/30/15 Page 2 of 2 On September 4, 2015, the parties filed a Stipulation of Facts Regarding Final Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. According to the stipulation, the parties agree upon an award of $16,901.36 for attorney’s fees and costs. In compliance with General Order #9, petitioner filed a statement indicating “did not incur costs related to the litigation of this matter.” Declaration, filed Sept. 4, 2015. Petitioner’s counsel also represents that petitioner incurred no out-of-pocket expenses. Stipulation, ¶ 4. The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. § 300 aa-15(e). I find the proposed amount to be reasonable. Accordingly, I award the total of $16,901.363 as a lump sum in the form of a check jointly payable to petitioner and petitioner’s counsel Danielle Strait. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Denise K. Vowell Denise K. Vowell Special Master 3 This amount is intended to cover all legal expenses incurred in this matter. This award encompasses all charges by the attorney against a client, “advanced costs” as well as fees for legal services rendered. Furthermore, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e)(3) prevents an attorney from charging or collecting fees (including costs) that would be in addition to the amount awarded herein. See generally Beck v. Sec’y, HHS, 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir.1991). 2