Rosie M. Taylor v. HHS - Influenza, shoulder and arm injury (2016)
Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]
On September 17, 2014, Rosie M. Taylor filed a petition under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act alleging she suffered a shoulder and arm injury as a result of an influenza vaccine received on October 12, 2011.
The respondent filed a Rule 4(c) Report on May 21, 2015, conceding that Ms. Taylor suffered from a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) and recommended compensation.
The parties subsequently agreed to a settlement. On June 27, 2016, respondent filed a Proffer on Award of Compensation.
Special Master Laura D. Millman issued a decision awarding damages based on this proffer.
The court awarded Ms. Taylor a total of $151,548.78, representing compensation for life care expenses for the first year ($10,023.27), pain and suffering ($138,126.46), and past unreimbursable expenses ($3,399.05).
This amount was to be paid as a lump sum check made payable to Ms. Taylor.
Additionally, the court awarded an amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract for future life care items, as detailed in the life care plan. The annuity payments would be made to Ms.
Taylor for her lifetime, with growth rates of four percent compounded annually for non-medical items and five percent compounded annually for medical items. The parties agreed that Ms.
Taylor had not suffered and would not suffer any loss of earnings. Petitioner counsel was Lisa A.
Roquemore, and respondent counsel was Camille M. Collett.
The decision was dated June 28, 2016.
Theory of causation
Petitioner Rosie M. Taylor alleged a shoulder and arm injury following an influenza vaccination on October 12, 2011. Respondent conceded the injury was a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA). The case was resolved via a damages decision based on a stipulation/proffer. The parties agreed to compensation for life care expenses for the first year ($10,023.27), pain and suffering ($138,126.46), and past unreimbursable expenses ($3,399.05), totaling $151,548.78 as a lump sum payment. An additional amount was awarded to purchase an annuity for future life care items, with specified growth rates for medical and non-medical items. Life care planners Linda Curtis and Liz Holakiewicz were engaged. No specific medical experts or detailed causation mechanism beyond the "Table" theory for SIRVA were described in the public text. The decision was issued by Special Master Laura D. Millman on June 28, 2016. Petitioner counsel was Lisa A. Roquemore, and respondent counsel was Camille M. Collett.
Source PDFs
USCOURTS-cofc-1_14-vv-00861