VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_14-vv-00472 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_14-vv-00472 Petitioner: D.P. Filed: 2014-09-02 Decided: 2014-12-15 Vaccine: MMR Vaccination date: 2011-08-15 Condition: thrombocytopenic purpura Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 50685 AI-assisted case summary: On June 4, 2014, Alisa Pittaluga, mother of D.P., a minor, filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. The petition alleged that D.P. suffered from thrombocytopenic purpura as a result of receiving a measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine on August 15, 2011. The respondent filed a report on August 29, 2014, conceding that the medical records satisfied the criteria set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table for demonstrating a presumptively vaccine-related thrombocytopenic purpura and that all other legal prerequisites for compensation were met. Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey, in a ruling on entitlement dated September 23, 2014, found that D.P. is entitled to compensation for an injury that was caused-in-fact by a covered vaccine, citing 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a)(XIV) and Althen v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs. A separate damages order was to issue. Subsequently, on November 24, 2014, the respondent filed a Proffer on Award of Compensation, which petitioner agreed to. In a decision dated December 15, 2014, Special Master Dorsey awarded compensation based on this proffer. The award consisted of a lump sum of $685.23 payable to Alisa Pittaluga for past unreimbursable expenses and a lump sum of $50,000.00 payable to Alisa Pittaluga as the guardian/conservator of D.P.'s estate for pain and suffering, totaling $50,685.23. The payment of the $50,000.00 was contingent upon Alisa Pittaluga providing documentation of her appointment as guardian/conservator of D.P.'s estate. Petitioner counsel was Christina Ciampolillo and Ronald Craig Homer of Conway, Homer & Chin-Caplan, P.C. Respondent counsel was Gordon Shemin and Gordon Elliot Shemin of the United States Department of Justice. The Special Master was Nora Beth Dorsey. Theory of causation field: Petitioner D.P., a minor, received a measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine on August 15, 2011. Petitioner alleged that D.P. suffered from thrombocytopenic purpura as a result of this vaccination. Respondent conceded that the medical records satisfied the criteria set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table for demonstrating a presumptively vaccine-related thrombocytopenic purpura and that all other legal prerequisites for compensation were met. The Special Master found that D.P. is entitled to compensation for an injury that was caused-in-fact by a covered vaccine, consistent with the "Table" theory. The award was based on a proffer agreed upon by both parties, totaling $50,685.23, consisting of $685.23 for past unreimbursable expenses and $50,000.00 for pain and suffering. The payment was contingent upon petitioner providing documentation of guardianship. Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey issued the entitlement ruling on September 23, 2014, and the damages decision on December 15, 2014. Petitioner counsel included Christina Ciampolillo and Ronald Craig Homer; respondent counsel was Gordon Shemin and Gordon Elliot Shemin. Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_14-vv-00472-0 Date issued/filed: 2014-09-23 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 09/02/2014) regarding 13 Ruling on Entitlement Signed by Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey. (tlj) Copy to parties. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:14-vv-00472-UNJ Document 15 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Case No. 14-472V Filed: September 2, 2014 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ALISA PITTALUGA, mother of * D.P., a minor, * UNPUBLISHED * Petitioner, * * Special Master Dorsey v. * * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) Vaccine; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Thrombocytopenic Purpura; Conceded. * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Christina Ciampolillo, Conway, Homer & Chin-Caplan, P.C., for petitioner. Gordon Shemin, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. UNPUBLISHED RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 On June 4, 2014, Alisa Pittaluga (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation on behalf of her child, D.P., under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“the Program”).2 Petitioner alleges that D.P. suffered from thrombocytopenic purpura as a result of receiving a measles-mumps-rubella (“MMR”) vaccine on August 15, 2011. Petition at 1. On August 29, 2014, respondent filed a report pursuant to Vaccine Rule 4(c) in which she concludes that “the medical records satisfy the criteria set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table … 1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post this decision on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002 § 205, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 (2006). In accordance with the Vaccine Rules, each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Further, consistent with the rule requirement, a motion for redaction must include a proposed redacted decision. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within the requirements of that provision, such material will be deleted from public access. 2 The Program comprises Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 et seq. (hereinafter “Vaccine Act” or “the Act”). Hereafter, individual section references will be to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa of the Act. 1 Case 1:14-vv-00472-UNJ Document 15 Filed 09/23/14 Page 2 of 2 for demonstrating a presumptively vaccine-related thrombocytopenic purpura.” Respondent’s Report at 4. The Rule 4 Report also acknowledges that petitioner has satisfied all the other legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act. Id. “Accordingly, respondent has concluded that compensation is appropriate for D.P.’s thrombocytopenic purpura.” Id. In view of respondent’s position and of the undersigned’s review of the entire record, see § 300aa-13(a)(1), the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation for an injury that was caused-in-fact by a covered vaccine. 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a)(XIV); Althen v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 418 F.3d 1274 (Fed. Cir. 2005). A separate damages order will issue. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Special Master ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_14-vv-00472-1 Date issued/filed: 2014-12-15 Pages: 5 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 11/24/2014) regarding 21 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer Signed by Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey. (tlj) Copy to parties. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:14-vv-00472-UNJ Document 26 Filed 12/15/14 Page 1 of 5 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 14-472V Filed: November 24, 2014 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ALISA PITTALUGA, mother of * UNPUBLISHED D.P., a minor, * Special Master Dorsey * Petitioner, * * v. * * Decision on Proffer; Damages; SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Table Injury; Measles-Mumps- AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Rubella (MMR) Vaccine; * Thrombocytopenic Purpura. Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Ronald Craig Homer, Conway, Homer & Chin-Caplan, P.C., Boston, MA, for petitioner. Gordon Elliot Shemin, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 On June 4, 2014, Alisa Pittaluga (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program2, on behalf of her child, D.P. 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006). Petitioner alleged that D.P received the measles-mumps rubella (MMR) vaccine on August 15, 2011, and thereafter suffered thrombocytopenic purpura. See Petition at 1. 1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case, the undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). 2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa. Case 1:14-vv-00472-UNJ Document 26 Filed 12/15/14 Page 2 of 5 On August 29, 2014, respondent filed a report pursuant to Vaccine Rule 4(c) conceding that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Report at 3-5. Specifically, respondent agreed that the medical records satisfy the criteria set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table and accompanying QAI for demonstrating a presumptively vaccine-related thrombocytopenic purpura. Id. at 4. On November 24, 2014, respondent filed a Proffer on Award of Compensation (“Proffer”). In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer (Appendix A), the undersigned awards petitioner: (1) A lump sum of $685.23, in the form of a check payable to petitioner Alisa Pittaluga; and (2) A lump sum payment of $50,000.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner Alisa Pittaluga as the guardian/conservator of D.P.’s estate. Respondent states that no payments shall be made until petitioner provides respondent with documentation establishing she has been appointed as the guardian/conservator of D.P.’s estate. This amount accounts for all elements of compensation under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) to which petitioner would be entitled. Proffer ¶ II. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT herewith.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:14-vv-00472-UNJ Document 26 Filed 12/15/14 Page 3 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ____________________________________ ) ALISA PITTALUGA, mother of ) D.P., a minor, ) ) Petitioner, ) No. 14-472V ) Special Master Dorsey v. ) ECF ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ) RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION I. Items of Compensation For purposes of this proffer, the term “vaccine-related” is as described in Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report, filed on August 29, 2014 conceding entitlement in this case. Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $50,685.23, consisting of $685.23 in past unreimbursable expenses and $50,000.00 in pain and suffering. This represents all elements of competition to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) for D.P.’s vaccine-related injury. Petitioner agrees. II. Form of the Award The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through two lump sum payments described below, and request that the Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following: A. A lump sum of $685.23 in the form of a check payable to petitioner Alisa Pittaluga; and B. A lump sum of $50,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner Alisa Pittaluga as the guardian/conservator of D.P.’s estate. Case 1:14-vv-00472-UNJ Document 26 Filed 12/15/14 Page 4 of 5 1. Guardianship No payments shall be made pursuant to paragraph B until petitioner provides respondent with documentation establishing that she has been appointed as the guardian/conservator of D.P.’s estate. If petitioner is not authorized by a court of competent jurisdiction to serve as guardian/conservator of the estate of D.P., any such payment shall be made to the party or parties appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction to serve as guardian/conservator of the estate of D.P. upon submission of written documentation of such appointment to the Secretary. III. Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment A. Lump sum paid to petitioner: $685.23 B. Lump sum paid to petitioner as the guardian/conservator of D.P.’s estate: $50,000.00 Respectfully submitted, JOYCE R. BRANDA Acting Assistant Attorney General RUPA BHATTACHARYYA Director Torts Branch, Civil Division VINCENT J. MATANOSKI Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division LYNN E. RICCIARDELLA Senior Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division 2 Case 1:14-vv-00472-UNJ Document 26 Filed 12/15/14 Page 5 of 5 /s/ Gordon Shemin GORDON SHEMIN Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Telephone: (202) 616-4208 Dated: November 24, 2014 Fax: (202) 353-2988 3