VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_14-vv-00379
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_14-vv-00379
Petitioner: James Clark
Filed: 2014-05-05
Decided: 2015-04-01
Vaccine: influenza
Vaccination date: 2012-09-19
Condition: Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP)
Outcome: compensated
Award amount USD: 101000

AI-assisted case summary:
James Clark filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on May 5, 2014, alleging that he suffered from Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP) caused by a flu vaccination he received on September 19, 2012. He further alleged that he experienced residual effects of his injuries for more than six months. The respondent denied that the flu vaccine caused petitioner's CIDP or any other injury. Despite the denial, the parties reached a settlement. Respondent agreed to pay petitioner a lump sum of $85,000.00 for all damages and a lump sum of $16,000.00 for attorneys' fees and costs. The Special Master adopted the stipulation and awarded compensation in the agreed-upon amount and terms. The public decision does not describe the specific onset of symptoms, diagnostic tests, treatments, or expert witnesses. Petitioner was represented by Danielle Strait, Esq., and respondent was represented by Justine Walters, Esq. Special Master Thomas L. Gowen issued the decision on April 1, 2015.

Theory of causation field:
Petitioner James Clark alleged that a September 19, 2012, flu vaccination caused his Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP) and residual effects lasting more than six months. Respondent denied causation. The parties reached a stipulation for settlement. The public decision does not detail the specific medical mechanism, expert testimony, or diagnostic findings. The case was settled "off-Table" with an award of $85,000.00 for damages and $16,000.00 for attorneys' fees and costs, totaling $101,000.00. Special Master Thomas L. Gowen issued the decision on April 1, 2015, adopting the joint stipulation. Petitioner counsel was Danielle Strait, Esq., and respondent counsel was Justine Walters, Esq.

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_14-vv-00379-0
Date issued/filed: 2015-04-01
Pages: 7
Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 03/11/2015) regarding 24 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer ( Signed by Special Master Thomas L. Gowen.)(mpj) Copy to parties.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:14-vv-00379-UNJ Document 28 Filed 04/01/15 Page 1 of 7
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 14-379V
Filed: March 11, 2015
(Unpublished)
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
JAMES CLARK, *
*
Petitioner, * Stipulation; Entitlement;
* Flu; Chronic Inflammatory
v. * Demyelinating Polyneuropathy;
* Attorneys’ Fees & Costs
SECRETARY OF HEALTH *
AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
*
Respondent. *
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Danielle Strait, Esq., Maglio, Christopher and Toale, PA (DC), for petitioner.
Justine Walters, Esq., U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1
Gowen, Special Master:
James Clark [“petitioner”] filed a petition for compensation under the National
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program2 on May 5, 2014. Petitioner alleges that he
suffered from Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy [CIDP] that was
caused in fact by a flu vaccination he received on September 19, 2012. See Stipulation,
filed March 11, 2015, at ¶¶ 2, 4. Further, petitioner alleges that he experienced residual
effects of his injuries for more than six months. Petition, filed May 5, 2014. Respondent
denies that the petitioner’s flu vaccine caused petitioner’s CIDP, or any other injury or
his current condition. Stipulation at ¶ 6.
1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend
to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44
U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), a party has 14 days to identify and
move to delete medical or other information, that satisfies the criteria in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B).
Further, consistent with the rule requirement, a motion for redaction must include a proposed redacted
decision. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within the requirements of that provision, I
will delete such material from public access.
2
National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2006).
1

Case 1:14-vv-00379-UNJ Document 28 Filed 04/01/15 Page 2 of 7
Nevertheless, the parties have agreed to settle the case. On March 11, 2015,
the parties filed a joint stipulation agreeing to settle this case and describing the
settlement terms.
Respondent agrees to pay petitioner:
a. A lump sum of $85,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner,
James Clark. This amount represents compensation for all damages that
would be available under § 300aa-15(a); and
b. A lump sum of $16,000.00 in the form of a check payable jointly to
petitioner and petitioner’s attorney, Danielle Strait, Esq. at Maglio,
Christopher & Toale, PA, for attorneys’ fees and costs available under §
300aa-15(e); and, in compliance with General Order #9, no out-of-pocket
expenses were incurred by petitioner in proceeding on the petition.
The special master adopts the parties’ stipulation attached hereto, and awards
compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth therein. The clerk of the court is
directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Thomas L. Gowen
Thomas L. Gowen
Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2

Case 1:14-vv-00379-UNJ Document 28 Filed 04/01/15 Page 3 of 7

Case 1:14-vv-00379-UNJ Document 28 Filed 04/01/15 Page 4 of 7

Case 1:14-vv-00379-UNJ Document 28 Filed 04/01/15 Page 5 of 7

Case 1:14-vv-00379-UNJ Document 28 Filed 04/01/15 Page 6 of 7

Case 1:14-vv-00379-UNJ Document 28 Filed 04/01/15 Page 7 of 7