VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_14-vv-00321
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_14-vv-00321
Petitioner: R.R.
Filed: 2014-04-21
Decided: 2019-11-15
Vaccine: MMR
Vaccination date: 2012-03-26
Condition: acute hemorrhagic leukoencephalitis (AHLE), a severe form of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM)
Outcome: compensated
Award amount USD: 1501820

AI-assisted case summary:
On April 21, 2014, Ashley and Craig Rice, parents of R.R., a minor, filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. They alleged that R.R. suffered from acute hemorrhagic leukoencephalitis (AHLE), a severe form of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), after receiving measles-mumps-rubella (MMR), hepatitis A, and influenza vaccinations on March 26, 2012. The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, denied that the immunizations caused R.R.'s injury. The parties, however, reached a joint stipulation to settle the case. The respondent agreed to issue several payments totaling $1,501,820.07. This amount included a lump sum of $741,454.94 for first-year life care expenses and trust seed funds, payable to Regions Bank as trustee. Another lump sum of $586,000.00, for lost earnings and pain and suffering, was to be paid to the petitioners as guardian(s)/conservator(s) of R.R.'s estate, contingent upon documentation of their appointment. A lump sum of $14,000.00 was designated for past unreimbursable expenses, payable to Ashley and Craig Rice. Additionally, $172,366.03 was allocated for reimbursement of a lien for services rendered on behalf of R.R., payable jointly to petitioners and DHHS. The stipulation also included an amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract, representing compensation for all damages available under § 300aa-15(a). Special Master Mindy Michaels Roth adopted the stipulation and awarded compensation accordingly. Edward Kraus, Esq., represented the petitioner, and Traci Patton, Esq., represented the respondent. The decision was filed on November 15, 2019.

Theory of causation field:
Petitioners alleged that R.R. suffered from acute hemorrhagic leukoencephalitis (AHLE), a severe form of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), after receiving measles-mumps-rubella (MMR), hepatitis A, and influenza vaccinations on March 26, 2012. The respondent denied causation. The parties reached a joint stipulation to settle the case, and the Special Master adopted the stipulation. The public decision does not describe the specific theory of causation, medical experts, clinical details of the injury onset or progression, diagnostic tests, or treatments. The settlement included a total award of $1,501,820.07, comprising specific lump sums for life care expenses, trust seed funds, lost earnings, pain and suffering, past unreimbursable expenses, lien reimbursement, and an amount for an annuity contract. Special Master Mindy Michaels Roth issued the decision on November 15, 2019. Petitioners were represented by Edward Kraus, Esq., and respondent by Traci Patton, Esq.

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_14-vv-00321-0
Date issued/filed: 2019-11-15
Pages: 13
Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 10/21/2019) regarding 94 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer. Signed by Special Master Mindy Michaels Roth. (mw) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:14-vv-00321-UNJ Document 98 Filed 11/15/19 Page 1 of 13
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 14-321V
Filed: October 21, 2019
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
ASHLEY RICE and CRAIG RICE * UNPUBLISHED
parents of R.R, a minor, *
*
Petitioners, * Decision on Joint Stipulation;
* Acute Hemorrhagic
v. * Leukoencephalitis (“AHLE”);
* Acute Disseminated
SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Encephalomyelitis (“ADEM”);
AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Measles-mumps-rubella
* (“MMR”) Vaccine; Hepatitis A
Respondent. * Vaccine; Influenza Vaccine
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Edward Kraus, Esq., Law Offices of Chicago Kent, Chicago, IL, for petitioner.
Traci Patton, Esq., US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1
Roth, Special Master:
On April 21, 2014, Ashley and Craig Rice [“Mr. and Mrs. Rice” or “petitioners”] filed a
petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program2 on behalf of
their minor child, R.R. Petitioners allege that R.R. suffered from acute hemorrhagic
leukoencephalitis (“AHLE”), a severe form of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (“ADEM”)
after receiving measles-mumps-rubella (“MMR”), hepatitis A, and influenza vaccinations on
March 26, 2012. Stipulation, filed Oct. 18, 2019, at ¶¶ 1-4. Respondent denies that any of the
aforementioned immunizations caused R.R.’s injury or her current condition. Stipulation at ¶ 6.
1 Although this Decision has been formally designated “unpublished,” it will nevertheless be posted on the
Court of Federal Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-
347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). This means the Decision
will be available to anyone with access to the internet. However, the parties may object to the Decision’s
inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party
has fourteen days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is
a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes
medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole Decision will be available to the public. Id.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa
(2012).

Case 1:14-vv-00321-UNJ Document 98 Filed 11/15/19 Page 2 of 13
Nevertheless, the parties have agreed to settle the case. On October 18, 2019, the parties
filed a joint stipulation agreeing to settle this case and describing the settlement terms.
Respondent agrees to issue the following payments:
(1) A lump sum of $741,454.94, representing compensation for first year life care
expenses ($141,454.94) and trust seed funds ($600,000.00), in the form of a check
payable to Regions Bank, as trustee of the grantor reversionary trust established for the
benefit of R.R.;
(2) A lump sum of $586,000.00, representing compensation for lost earnings and pain
and suffering, in the form of a check payable to petitioners as
guardian(s)/conservator(s) of the estate of R.R., for the benefit of R.R. No payments
shall be made until petitioners provide respondent with documentation establishing that
they have been appointed as guardian(s)/conservator(s) of R.R.’s estate;
(3) A lump sum of $14,000.00, representing compensation for past unreimbursable
expenses, in the form of a check payable to petitioners, Ashley and Craig Rice;
(4) A lump sum of $172,366.03, representing reimbursement of a lien for services
rendered on behalf of R.R., in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioners and
DHHS
Reporting and Receivables
P.O. Box 8355
Columbia, SC 29202-9189
Case Number: 327172
Attn: Latwainia Benjamin
(5) An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described in paragraph 10
of the stipulation attached hereto, paid to the life insurance company from which the
annuity will be purchased. This amount represents compensation for all damages that
would be available under § 300aa-15(a).
I adopt the parties’ stipulation attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount and
on the terms set forth therein. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance
with this decision.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Mindy Michaels Roth
Mindy Michaels Roth
Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2

Case 1:14-vv-00321-UNJ Document 98 Filed 11/15/19 Page 3 of 13

Case 1:14-vv-00321-UNJ Document 98 Filed 11/15/19 Page 4 of 13

Case 1:14-vv-00321-UNJ Document 98 Filed 11/15/19 Page 5 of 13

Case 1:14-vv-00321-UNJ Document 98 Filed 11/15/19 Page 6 of 13

Case 1:14-vv-00321-UNJ Document 98 Filed 11/15/19 Page 7 of 13

Case 1:14-vv-00321-UNJ Document 98 Filed 11/15/19 Page 8 of 13

Case 1:14-vv-00321-UNJ Document 98 Filed 11/15/19 Page 9 of 13

Case 1:14-vv-00321-UNJ Document 98 Filed 11/15/19 Page 10 of 13

Case 1:14-vv-00321-UNJ Document 98 Filed 11/15/19 Page 11 of 13

Case 1:14-vv-00321-UNJ Document 98 Filed 11/15/19 Page 12 of 13

Case 1:14-vv-00321-UNJ Document 98 Filed 11/15/19 Page 13 of 13