P.D. v. HHS - Rotavirus, intussception, hepatic flexure, and appendicitis (2015)

Filed 2015-02-23Decided 2015-03-16Vaccine Rotavirus
dismissed

Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]

On February 23, 2015, Jeff and Cynthia Davis, as legal representatives of their minor child P.D., filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Act. They alleged that P.D. suffered intussception, hepatic flexure, and appendicitis as a result of rotavirus vaccines received on May 10, 2011, July 8, 2011, and September 16, 2011.

The respondent filed a report on October 15, 2014, stating that the case was not appropriate for compensation because the petitioners failed to provide sufficient medical evidence to establish a logical cause-and-effect relationship between the vaccinations and the alleged injuries. Subsequently, on February 13, 2015, the petitioners filed a motion for a dismissal decision, acknowledging that they would be unable to prove entitlement to compensation.

Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey noted that to receive compensation, petitioners must prove either a Table Injury or that the vaccine actually caused the injury. The public decision does not describe evidence of a Table Injury, nor does it include a medical expert's opinion or other persuasive evidence of causation.

The public decision does not describe the onset, symptoms, specific medical tests, or treatments for P.D.'s condition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for insufficient proof.

The attorneys involved were Jeremy Zivko Soso for the petitioners and Lara Ann Englund for the respondent. The decision was issued by Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey on March 16, 2015.

Theory of causation

Petitioners P.D. (minor child represented by Jeff and Cynthia Davis) alleged that rotavirus vaccines administered on May 10, 2011, July 8, 2011, and September 16, 2011, caused intussception, hepatic flexure, and appendicitis. The respondent stated that petitioners failed to proffer sufficient medical evidence to establish a logical cause-and-effect relationship. Petitioners subsequently filed a motion for dismissal, acknowledging they could not prove entitlement. Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey noted that entitlement requires proof of a Table Injury or actual causation. The record did not contain evidence of a Table Injury, nor did it include a medical expert's opinion or other persuasive evidence of causation. The petition was dismissed for insufficient proof on March 16, 2015. Attorneys were Jeremy Zivko Soso for petitioners and Lara Ann Englund for respondent. The public decision does not specify the mechanism of injury or name any medical experts.

Source PDFs 1 total · 1 downloaded