VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_14-vv-00238
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_14-vv-00238
Petitioner: Linda Leggett
Filed: 2014-07-29
Decided: 2014-07-29
Vaccine: influenza
Vaccination date: 2012-10-19
Condition: shoulder injury related to vaccine administration [SIRVA]
Outcome: compensated
Award amount USD: 115000

AI-assisted case summary:
Linda Leggett filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, alleging that she received the influenza vaccine on October 19, 2012, and subsequently suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA). Respondent conceded that Ms. Leggett was entitled to compensation. A Ruling on Entitlement was issued on July 10, 2014. On July 28, 2014, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation, agreeing to a lump sum payment of $115,000.00 for all damages. Ms. Leggett, an adult, agreed to this amount. Subsequently, on July 29, 2014, the parties filed a stipulation for attorney fees and costs, agreeing to an award of $15,456.23, payable jointly to Ms. Leggett and her counsel. The Special Master issued a Decision on Damages on July 29, 2014, awarding the $115,000.00, and a Decision on Attorney Fees and Costs on August 22, 2014, awarding the $15,456.23.

Theory of causation field:
Off-Table

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_14-vv-00238-0
Date issued/filed: 2014-08-22
Pages: 4
Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 07/29/2014) regarding 11 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer (Signed by Special Master Thomas L. Gowen.)(mpj) Copy to parties.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:14-vv-00238-UNJ Document 18 Filed 08/22/14 Page 1 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 14-238V
Filed: July 29, 2014
(Not to be published)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINDA LEGGETT, *
*
Petitioner, * Conceded; Influenza Vaccine;
v. * Shoulder Injury related to vaccine
* administration [SIRVA]; Proffer
SECRETARY OF HEALTH * on Damages
AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
*
Respondent. *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Maximillian Muller, Esq., Muller Brazil, LLP, Philadelphia, PA for petitioner.
Linda Renzi, Esq., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC for respondent.
DECISION ON DAMAGES1
Gowen, Special Master:
On March 27, 2014, Linda Leggett [“petitioner”] filed a petition for compensation
under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et
seq.2 [the “Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. The petition alleges that petitioner received the
influenza vaccine on October 19, 2012, and thereafter suffered a shoulder injury which
was caused-in-fact by the influenza vaccine. Petition at 1. On July 3, 2014, respondent
filed her Rule 4(c) report [“Respondent’s Report”], in which she concedes that petitioner
is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Report at 4. I issued a Ruling on
Entitlement on July 10, 2014.
On July 28, 2014, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation, which
indicated that petitioner agreed to the compensation amount. Additionally, petitioner’s
1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to
post this ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44
U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and
move to delete medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted
invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will
delete such material from public access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C.
§ 300aa (2006).

Case 1:14-vv-00238-UNJ Document 18 Filed 08/22/14 Page 2 of 4
counsel was contacted by my chambers on July 28, 2014, where he confirmed
petitioner’s agreement with the proposed compensation amount contained within the
filed Proffer.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award petitioner a lump
sum payment of $115,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Linda
Leggett. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be
available under § 300aa-15(a).
The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
decision.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Thomas L. Gowen
Thomas L. Gowen
Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2

Case 1:14-vv-00238-UNJ Document 18 Filed 08/22/14 Page 3 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
LINDA LEGGETT, )
)
Petitioner, ) No. 14-238V
) Special Master
v. ) Thomas L. Gowen
) ECF
SECRETARY OF HEALTH )
AND HUMAN SERVICES, )
)
Respondent. )
)
RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
I. Compensation for Vaccine Injury-Related Items:
Respondent proffers that, based on the evidence of record, petitioner should be
awarded $115,000.00. This amount represents all elements of compensation to which
petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(1); §15(a)(3)(B); and
§15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.
II. Form of the Award:
The parties recommend that the compensation provided to Linda Leggett should be
made through a lump sum payment as described below, and request that the special
master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following:1
A. A lump sum payment of $115,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner,
Linda Leggett. This amount accounts for all elements of compensation under 42
U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) to which petitioner would be entitled.
Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move
the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for
future medical expenses and future pain and suffering.
1

Case 1:14-vv-00238-UNJ Document 18 Filed 08/22/14 Page 4 of 4
Respectfully submitted,
STUART F. DELERY
Assistant Attorney General
RUPA BHATTACHARYYA
Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
VINCENT J. MATANOSKI
Deputy Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
LYNN E. RICCIARDELLA
Senior Trial attorney
Torts Branch, Civil Division
s/ Linda S. Renzi
LINDA S. RENZI
Senior Trial Counsel
Torts Branch, Civil Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 146
Benjamin Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
Tel.: (202) 616-4356
DATED: July 28, 2014
2

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_14-vv-00238-1
Date issued/filed: 2014-08-22
Pages: 2
Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 07/29/2014) regarding 13 DECISION Fees Stipulation/Proffer (Signed by Special Master Thomas L. Gowen.)(mpj) Copy to parties.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:14-vv-00238-UNJ Document 19 Filed 08/22/14 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 14-238V
Filed: July 29, 2014
(Not to be published)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINDA LEGGETT, *
*
Petitioner, * Stipulation; Attorney’s Fees and Costs
v. *
*
SECRETARY OF HEALTH *
AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
*
Respondent. *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Maximillian Muller, Esq., Muller Brazil, LLP, Philadelphia, PA for petitioner.
Linda Renzi, Esq., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC for respondent.
DECISION ON ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS 1
Gowen, Special Master:
In this case under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program,2 I issued
a Ruling on Entitlement on July 10, 2014, and a Decision on Damages on July 29, 2014,
that awarded compensation pursuant to respondent’s Proffer filed on July 28, 2014. On
July 29, 2014, the parties filed a stipulation for attorney fees and costs. The stipulation
indicates that respondent does not object to the amount petitioner is requesting.
Additionally, pursuant to General Order #9, the stipulation notes that petitioner incurred
no personal litigation costs.
I find that this petition was brought in good faith and that there existed a
reasonable basis for the claim. Therefore, an award for fees and costs is appropriate,
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-15(b) and (e)(1). Further, the proposed amount seems
reasonable and appropriate. Accordingly, I hereby award the total $15,456.233 in
1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to
post this ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44
U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and
move to delete medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted
invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will
delete such material from public access.
2 The applicable statutory provisions defining the program are found at 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 et seq.
(2006).
3 This amount is intended to cover all legal expenses incurred in this matter. This award encompasses all

Case 1:14-vv-00238-UNJ Document 19 Filed 08/22/14 Page 2 of 2
the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner and petitioner’s counsel of
record, Maximillian J. Muller, for petitioner’s attorney fees and costs.
The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
decision.4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Thomas L. Gowen
Thomas L. Gowen
Special Master
charges by the attorney against a client, “advanced costs” as well as fees for legal services rendered.
Furthermore, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e)(3) prevents an attorney from charging or collecting fees (including
costs) that would be in addition to the amount awarded herein. See generally Beck v. Sec’y, HHS, 924
F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir.1991).
4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2