VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_14-vv-00196
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_14-vv-00196
Petitioner: Marie Verdier
Filed: 2014-07-15
Decided: 2014-07-15
Vaccine: influenza
Vaccination date: 2012-10-23
Condition: adhesive capsulitis, shoulder impingement, and tendinosis in her left shoulder
Outcome: compensated
Award amount USD: 104059

AI-assisted case summary:
Marie Verdier filed a petition on March 10, 2014, alleging that she suffered adhesive capsulitis, shoulder impingement, and tendinosis in her left shoulder as a result of receiving an influenza vaccine on October 23, 2012. The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, filed a Rule 4(c) report on June 13, 2014, conceding that Ms. Verdier suffered from a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) and recommending compensation. On July 15, 2014, the respondent filed a Proffer on Award of Compensation. Special Master Laura D. Millman reviewed the proffer and found its terms reasonable. Based on the record, the Special Master awarded Ms. Verdier a lump sum payment of $104,059.49. This amount represented $100,000.00 for actual and projected pain and suffering and $4,059.49 for past unreimbursable expenses related to her vaccine-related injury. The award was to be paid via check to the petitioner. The decision noted that the parties stipulated to these amounts and that petitioner agreed she was not entitled to future medical care expenses or lost earnings. Separately, on July 25, 2014, the parties filed a stipulation of fact regarding attorneys' fees and costs. Petitioner asserted no out-of-pocket expenses. After informal discussions where the respondent raised objections to certain items, petitioner amended her request to $17,711.02, which the respondent did not object to. Special Master Millman found this amount reasonable and awarded $17,711.02 for attorneys' fees and costs, to be paid via check jointly to petitioner and Muller Brazil, L.L.P. The public decision does not describe the specific onset of symptoms, medical tests performed, or treatments received. Petitioner was represented by Paul R. Brazil, and respondent was represented by Claudia B. Gangi.

Theory of causation field:
Petitioner Marie Verdier alleged that an influenza vaccine administered on October 23, 2012, caused adhesive capsulitis, shoulder impingement, and tendinosis in her left shoulder. The respondent conceded that petitioner suffered from a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA). The parties stipulated to an award for pain and suffering and past unreimbursable expenses. The theory of causation is based on the "Table" category of SIRVA. No specific medical experts or detailed mechanism of injury were described in the public decision. The award included a lump sum of $100,000.00 for pain and suffering and $4,059.49 for past unreimbursable expenses, totaling $104,059.49. Attorneys' fees and costs were awarded separately in the amount of $17,711.02. Special Master Laura D. Millman issued the decision on July 15, 2014, for the damages award and July 25, 2014, for the fees award. Petitioner was represented by Paul R. Brazil, and respondent was represented by Claudia B. Gangi.

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_14-vv-00196-0
Date issued/filed: 2014-08-05
Pages: 6
Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 07/15/2014) regarding 13 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer Signed by Special Master Laura D Millman. (tlj) Copy to parties.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:14-vv-00196-UNJ Document 20 Filed 08/05/14 Page 1 of 6
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 14-196V
Filed: July 15, 2014
Not for Publication
*************************************
MARIE VERDIER, *
*
Petitioner, *
* Damages decision based on proffer;
v. * flu vaccine; adhesive capsulitis;
* shoulder impingement; tendinosis;
SECRETARY OF HEALTH * SIRVA
AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
*
Respondent. *
*
*************************************
Paul R. Brazil, Philadelphia, PA, for petitioner.
Claudia B. Gangi, Washington, DC, for respondent.
MILLMAN, Special Master
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
On March 10, 2014, petitioner filed a petition under the National Childhood Vaccine
Injury Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10–34 (2006), alleging that she suffered adhesive capsulitis,
shoulder impingement, and tendinosis in her left shoulder as a result of receiving influenza
(“flu”) vaccine on October 23, 2012.
On June 13, 2014, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) Report conceding that petitioner
1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master's action in this case, the
special master intends to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims's website, in
accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17,
2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made available to the
public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is privileged and
confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact
such information prior to the document=s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, agrees that the
identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall redact such
material from public access.
1

Case 1:14-vv-00196-UNJ Document 20 Filed 08/05/14 Page 2 of 6
suffered from a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) and recommending
compensation.
On July 15, 2014, respondent filed Respondent’s Proffer on Award of Compensation.
The undersigned finds the terms of the proffer to be reasonable. Based on the record as a whole,
the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to the award as stated in the proffer. Pursuant to
the terms stated in the attached proffer, the court awards petitioner a lump sum payment of
$104,059.49, representing compensation for actual and projected pain and suffering
($100,000.00) and past unreimbursable expenses related to her vaccine-related injury
($4,059.49). The award shall be in the form of a check for $104,059.49 made payable to
petitioner.
In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
the court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 15, 2014 /s/ Laura D. Millman
Laura D. Millman
Special Master
2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or
jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
2

Case 1:14-vv-00196-UNJ Document 20 Filed 08/05/14 Page 3 of 6
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
)
MARIE VERDIER, )
)
Petitioner, )
)
No. 14-196V
v. )
Special Master Laura D. Millman
)
ECF
SECRETARY OF HEALTH )
AND HUMAN SERVICES, )
)
Respondent. )
)
RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
On February 11, 2014, Marie Verdier, a/k/a Marie Gesumene Pervelus Verdier
(“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the Vaccine Act.1 Petitioner alleges that
she received an influenza vaccine in her left arm on October 23, 2012, and subsequently suffered
adhesive capsulitis, shoulder impingement, and tendinosis in her left shoulder secondary to the
vaccination. (See generally Dkt. 9, Resp.’s Rep. 1–3.) The Secretary of Health and Human
Services (“respondent”) filed a Vaccine Rule 4(c) report, conceding that petitioner suffered from
a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), and recommending that the Court
award petitioner compensation. (Id. at 4–5.) Respondent hereby submits the following proffer
regarding the award of compensation.
1 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (“Vaccine Act”) of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, tit. III,
§§ 301–323, 100 Stat. 3743, 3755 (1986), as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to 300aa-34. All
U.S.C. citations are to U.S.C.A. (West, Westlaw through P.L. 113-120, June 10, 2014).

Case 1:14-vv-00196-UNJ Document 20 Filed 08/05/14 Page 4 of 6
I. Items of Compensation
A. Future Medical Care Expenses
Respondent proffers that based on the evidence of record, petitioner is not entitled to an
award for projected unreimbursable medical care expenses incurred from the date of judgment as
provided under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(1)(A). Petitioner agrees.
B. Lost Earnings
Respondent proffers that based upon the evidence of record, petitioner has not and is not
likely to suffer a loss of earnings as a result of her vaccine-related injury. Accordingly, the Court
should not award lost future earnings as provided under § 300aa-15(a)(3)(A). Petitioner agrees.
C. Pain and Suffering
Respondent proffers that the Court should award petitioner a lump sum of $100,000.00
for her actual and projected pain and suffering. This amount reflects that the award for projected
pain and suffering has been reduced to net present value. See § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner
agrees.
D. Past Unreimbursable Expenses
Respondent proffers that based upon the evidence of record, petitioner has incurred
$4,059.49 in past unreimbursable expenses related to her vaccine-related injury. Petitioner
agrees.
E. Medicaid Lien
Petitioner represents that there are no outstanding Medicaid liens related to her vaccine-
related injury.
2

Case 1:14-vv-00196-UNJ Document 20 Filed 08/05/14 Page 5 of 6
II. Form of the Award
The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made
through a lump sum payment as described below and request that the Special Master’s decision
and the Court’s judgment award the following2: a lump sum payment of $104,059.49
(representing compensation for actual and projected pain and suffering, and past unreimbursable
expenses related to the vaccine-related injury), in the form of a check payable to petitioner.
III. Summary of Recommended Payment Following Judgment
A lump sum payment of $104,059.49, representing compensation for actual and projected
pain and suffering, and past unreimbursable expenses related to the vaccine-related injury,
payable to petitioner.
Respectfully submitted,
STUART F. DELERY
Assistant Attorney General
RUPA BHATTACHARYYA
Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
VINCENT J. MATANOSKI
Deputy Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
HEATHER L. PEARLMAN
Senior Trial Attorney
Torts Branch, Civil Division
2 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future pain and
suffering.
3

Case 1:14-vv-00196-UNJ Document 20 Filed 08/05/14 Page 6 of 6
/s/ Claudia B. Gangi
CLAUDIA B. GANGI
Senior Trial Attorney
Torts Branch, Civil Division
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
P.O. Box 146
Benjamin Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
Tel: (202) 616-4138
DATED: July 15, 2014
4

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_14-vv-00196-1
Date issued/filed: 2014-08-15
Pages: 2
Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 07/25/2014) regarding 15 DECISION Fees Stipulation/Proffer Signed by Special Master Laura D Millman. (tlj) Copy to parties.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:14-vv-00196-UNJ Document 21 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 2
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 14-196V
Filed: July 25, 2014
Not for Publication
*************************************
MARIE VERDIER, *
*
Petitioner, * Attorneys’ fees and costs decision based on
* stipulation of fact
v. *
*
SECRETARY OF HEALTH *
AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
*
Respondent. *
*
*************************************
Paul R. Brazil, Philadelphia, PA, for petitioner.
Claudia B. Gangi, Washington, DC, for respondent.
MILLMAN, Special Master
DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1
On July 25, 2014, the parties filed a stipulation of fact in which they agreed on an
appropriate amount for attorneys’ fees and costs in this case.
In accordance with the General Order #9 requirement, petitioner asserts she did not incur
any out-of-pocket expenses in pursuit of her petition. Petitioner submitted her request for
attorneys’ fees and costs to respondent. During informal discussions, respondent raised
objections to certain items in petitioner’s application. Based on these objections, petitioner
1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this
case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal
Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899,
2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made
available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is
privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly
unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and
move to redact such information prior to the document=s disclosure. If the special master, upon review,
agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall
redact such material from public access.

Case 1:14-vv-00196-UNJ Document 21 Filed 08/15/14 Page 2 of 2
amends her request for reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and costs to $17,711.02. Respondent
does not object to this amount. The undersigned finds this amount to be reasonable.
Accordingly, the court awards $17,711.02, representing reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and
costs. The award shall be in the form of a check made payable jointly to petitioner and Muller
Brazil, L.L.P. in the amount of $17,711.02.
In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the
court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 25, 2014 s/ Laura D. Millman
Laura D. Millman
Special Master
2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or
jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
2