VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_14-vv-00023 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_14-vv-00023 Petitioner: Richard Sewell Filed: 2014-01-09 Decided: 2014-10-24 Vaccine: influenza Vaccination date: 2012-10-17 Condition: Guillain-Barre Syndrome and Brachial Neuritis Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 65173 AI-assisted case summary: Richard Sewell filed a petition on January 9, 2014, alleging that he developed Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) and Brachial Neuritis (BN) as a result of receiving an influenza vaccine on October 17, 2012. He further alleged that he experienced residual effects from his injuries for more than six months. The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, denied that the flu vaccine caused Mr. Sewell's GBS and/or BN. The parties, however, reached a joint stipulation for damages. Special Master Thomas L. Gowen adopted this stipulation, awarding Mr. Sewell a lump sum of $65,173.50 for all damages available under the program. The parties also stipulated to an award of attorneys' fees and costs, totaling $8,292.07, which Special Master Gowen also approved. Judgment was entered in accordance with the stipulation on October 24, 2014. The public decision does not describe the onset of symptoms, specific medical tests, treatments, or the mechanism of causation. Petitioner was represented by Mark L. Krueger of Krueger & Hernandez S.C., and respondent was represented by Debra A. Filteau Begley of the United States Department of Justice. Theory of causation field: Petitioner Richard Sewell alleged that an influenza vaccine administered on October 17, 2012, caused Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) and Brachial Neuritis (BN), with residual effects lasting more than six months. Respondent denied causation. The parties reached a joint stipulation for damages and attorneys' fees and costs. Special Master Thomas L. Gowen adopted the stipulation, awarding petitioner $65,173.50 for all damages and $8,292.07 for attorneys' fees and costs. The decision was issued on October 24, 2014. The public text does not detail the specific theory of causation, medical experts, or the mechanism of injury. Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_14-vv-00023-0 Date issued/filed: 2014-10-24 Pages: 7 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 10/03/2014) regarding 20 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer (Signed by Special Master Thomas L. Gowen.)(mpj) Copy to parties. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:14-vv-00023-UNJ Document 28 Filed 10/24/14 Page 1 of 7 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 14-23V Filed: October 3, 2014 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * UNPUBLISHED RICHARD SEWELL, * * Special Master Gowen Petitioner, * * Joint Stipulation on Damages; v. * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; * Guillain-Barre Syndrome; Brachial SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Neuritis AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mark L. Krueger, Krueger & Hernandez S.C., Baraboo, WI, for petitioner. Debra A. Filteau Begley, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1 On January 9, 2014, Richard Sewell (“petitioner”) filed a petition pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006). Petitioner alleged that, as a result of receiving an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on October 17, 2012, he developed Guillain-Barre Syndrome (“GBS”) and Brachial Neuritis (“BN”). Stipulation ¶ 2, 4, filed Oct. 2, 2014. Further, petitioner alleged that he experienced residual effects of his injury for more than six months. Id. at ¶ 4. 1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case, the undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). 2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa. 1 Case 1:14-vv-00023-UNJ Document 28 Filed 10/24/14 Page 2 of 7 On October 2, 2014, the parties filed a stipulation in which they state that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. Respondent denies that the flu immunization caused petitioner’s GBS and/or BN, or any other condition. Id. at ¶ 6. Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto as Appendix A. The undersigned finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein. The parties stipulate that petitioner shall receive the following compensation: A lump sum of $65,173.50, in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Richard Sewell. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Id. at ¶ 8. The parties also stipulate to an award of attorneys’ fees and costs for petitioner and his attorney. A decision awarding fees and costs will be issued separately. The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation. Accordingly, an award should be made consistent with the stipulation. The clerk of the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Thomas L. Gowen Thomas L. Gowen Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:14-vv-00023-UNJ Document 28 Filed 10/24/14 Page 3 of 7 Case 1:14-vv-00023-UNJ Document 28 Filed 10/24/14 Page 4 of 7 Case 1:14-vv-00023-UNJ Document 28 Filed 10/24/14 Page 5 of 7 Case 1:14-vv-00023-UNJ Document 28 Filed 10/24/14 Page 6 of 7 Case 1:14-vv-00023-UNJ Document 28 Filed 10/24/14 Page 7 of 7 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_14-vv-00023-1 Date issued/filed: 2014-10-24 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 10/03/2014) regarding 21 DECISION Fees Stipulation/Proffer (Signed by Special Master Thomas L. Gowen.)(mpj) Copy to parties. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:14-vv-00023-UNJ Document 29 Filed 10/24/14 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 14-23V Filed: October 3, 2014 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * UNPUBLISHED RICHARD SEWELL, * * Special Master Gowen Petitioner, * * Joint Stipulation; v. * Attorneys’ Fees and Costs; * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mark L. Krueger, Krueger & Hernandez, S.C., Baraboo, WI, for petitioner. Debra A. Filteau Begley, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. DECISION ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1 On January 9, 2014, Richard Sewell (“petitioner”) filed a petition pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006). Petitioner alleged that as a result of receiving an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on or about October 17, 2012, he developed Guillain-Barre Syndrome (“GBS”) and Brachial Neuritis (“BN”). Petition at Preamble, filed Jan. 9, 2014. On October 2, 2014, the parties filed a stipulation in which they agreed to an award of compensation to petitioner. On October 3, 2014, the 1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case, the undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). 2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa. 1 Case 1:14-vv-00023-UNJ Document 29 Filed 10/24/14 Page 2 of 2 undersigned issued a Decision adopting the parties’ stipulation for an award. See Decision on J. Stip., filed Oct. 3, 2014. The parties also stipulated to an award of attorneys’ fees and costs in the joint stipulation filed on October 2, 2014. See Stipulation at ¶ 8(b). Petitioner requests a total award of attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $8,292.07. In accordance with General Order #9, petitioner represents that he did not personally incur any costs in litigating this matter. Id. The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. § 300 aa-15(e). Based on the reasonableness of the parties’ stipulation, the undersigned adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding attorneys’ fees and costs. Accordingly, an award should be made as follows: (1) in the form of a check jointly payable to petitioner and to petitioner’s attorney, Mark L. Krueger, of Krueger & Hernandez, S.C., in the amount of $8,292.07. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance herewith.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Thomas L. Gowen Thomas L. Gowen Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2