VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_13-vv-00985
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_13-vv-00985
Petitioner: Ching-Ping Chih
Filed: 2013-12-12
Decided: 2014-08-22
Vaccine: influenza
Vaccination date: 2012-09-20
Condition: subdeltoid bursitis
Outcome: compensated
Award amount USD: 110000

AI-assisted case summary:
On December 12, 2013, Ching-Ping Chih filed a petition alleging that she suffered subdeltoid bursitis in her left shoulder secondary to an influenza vaccine received on September 20, 2012. The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, filed a Rule 4(c) Report on April 4, 2014, conceding that Ms. Chih suffered from a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) and recommended compensation. On August 12, 2014, the respondent filed a Proffer on Award of Compensation. The respondent proffered that Ms. Chih should be awarded $110,000.00 for her actual and projected pain and suffering. The respondent also proffered that Ms. Chih was not entitled to an award for future medical care expenses, lost earnings, past unreimbursable expenses, or any outstanding Medicaid liens. Special Master Laura D. Millman found the terms of the proffer to be reasonable and awarded Ms. Chih a lump sum payment of $110,000.00 for all damages available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). The award was to be paid by check to Ms. Chih. Separately, on August 21, 2014, the parties filed a stipulation of facts regarding attorneys' fees and costs. Petitioner asserted she incurred no costs, but submitted a request for attorneys' fees and costs. After informal discussions where the respondent raised objections, the petitioner amended her application to $13,696.22, which the respondent did not object to. Special Master Millman found this amount to be reasonable and awarded $13,696.22 for attorneys' fees and costs. This award was to be paid by check jointly to Ms. Chih and Maglio, Christopher & Toale, P.A. The case was resolved through these stipulated awards.

Theory of causation field:
Ching-Ping Chih filed a petition alleging subdeltoid bursitis in her left shoulder secondary to an influenza vaccine administered on September 20, 2012. The respondent conceded that petitioner suffered from a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA). The parties stipulated to an award of $110,000.00 for pain and suffering. Petitioner also received an award of $13,696.22 for attorneys' fees and costs, based on a stipulation of facts. Special Master Laura D. Millman issued decisions awarding damages and attorneys' fees and costs. The public decision does not describe the specific medical mechanism or expert testimony regarding causation.

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_13-vv-00985-0
Date issued/filed: 2014-09-04
Pages: 6
Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 08/13/2014) regarding 19 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer Signed by Special Master Laura D Millman. (tlj) Copy to parties.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:13-vv-00985-UNJ Document 27 Filed 09/04/14 Page 1 of 6
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 13-985V
Filed: August 13, 2014
Not for Publication
*************************************
CHING-PING CHIH, *
*
Petitioner, *
* Damages decision based on proffer;
v. * influenza (flu) vaccine; subdeltoid
* bursitis; shoulder injury related to
SECRETARY OF HEALTH * vaccine administration (SIRVA)
AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
*
Respondent. *
*
*************************************
F. John Caldwell, Jr., Sarasota, FL, for petitioner.
Claudia B. Gangi, Washington, DC, for respondent.
MILLMAN, Special Master
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
On December 12, 2013, petitioner filed a petition under the National Childhood Vaccine
Injury Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10–34 (2006), alleging that she suffered subdeltoid bursitis in her
left shoulder secondary to the influenza (“flu”) vaccination she received on September 20, 2012.
On April 4, 2014, respondent filed a Rule 4(c) Report conceding that petitioner suffered from a
shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) and recommending compensation.
1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master's action in this case, the
special master intends to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims's website, in
accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17,
2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made available to the
public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is privileged and
confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact
such information prior to the document=s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, agrees that the
identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall redact such
material from public access.
1

Case 1:13-vv-00985-UNJ Document 27 Filed 09/04/14 Page 2 of 6
On August 12, 2014, respondent filed Respondent’s Proffer on Award of Compensation.
Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $110,000.00 for her actual and projected
pain and suffering and proffers that petitioner is not entitled to an award for future medical care
expenses, lost earnings, past unreimbursable expenses, or any outstanding Medicaid liens. The
undersigned finds the terms of the proffer to be reasonable. Based on the record as a whole, the
undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to the award as stated in the proffer. Pursuant to the
terms stated in the attached proffer, the court awards petitioner a lump sum payment of
$110,000.00, representing compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C.
§ 300aa-15(a) (2006). The award shall be in the form of a check for $110,000.00 made payable
to petitioner.
In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
the court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 13, 2014 /s/ Laura D. Millman
by Nora Beth Dorsey
Laura D. Millman
Special Master
2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or
jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
2

Case 1:13-vv-00985-UNJ Document 27 Filed 09/04/14 Page 3 of 6
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
_________________________________________
)
CHING-PING CHIH, )
)
Petitioner, )
) No. 13-985V
v. ) Special Master Millman
) ECF
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND )
HUMAN SERVICES, )
)
Respondent. )
__________________________________________)
RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
On December 12, 2013, Ching-Ping Chih (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation
under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10 to 34.
Petitioner alleges that she received an influenza vaccine in her left arm on September 20, 2012,
and subsequently suffered subdeltoid bursitis in her left shoulder secondary to the vaccination.
Petition at 1-2. On April 4, 2014, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“respondent”)
filed a Vaccine Rule 4(c) Report, conceding that petitioner suffered from a shoulder injury
related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), and recommending that the Court award petitioner
compensation. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 3. Respondent hereby submits the following
proffer regarding the award of compensation.
1

Case 1:13-vv-00985-UNJ Document 27 Filed 09/04/14 Page 4 of 6
I. Items of Compensation
A. Future Medical Care Expenses
Respondent proffers that based on the evidence of record, petitioner is not entitled to an
award for projected unreimbursable medical care expenses incurred from the date of judgment as
provided under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(1)(A). Petitioner agrees.
B. Lost Earnings
Respondent proffers that based upon the evidence of record, petitioner has not and is not
likely to suffer a loss of earnings as a result of her vaccine-related injury. Accordingly, the Court
should not award lost future earnings as provided under § 300aa-15(a)(3)(A). Petitioner agrees.
C. Pain and Suffering
Respondent proffers that the Court should award petitioner a lump sum of $110,000.00
for her actual and projected pain and suffering. This amount reflects that the award for projected
pain and suffering has been reduced to net present value. See § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner
agrees.
D. Past Unreimbursable Expenses
Respondent proffers that based upon the evidence of record, petitioner has not incurred
any past unreimbursable expenses related to her vaccine-related injury. Petitioner agrees.
E. Medicaid Lien
Petitioner represents that there are no outstanding Medicaid liens related to her vaccine-
related injury.
2

Case 1:13-vv-00985-UNJ Document 27 Filed 09/04/14 Page 5 of 6
II. Form of the Award
The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through
a lump sum payment as described below and request that the Special Master’s decision and the
Court’s judgment award the following1: a lump sum payment of $110,000.00 (representing
compensation for actual and projected pain and suffering), in the form of a check payable to
petitioner.
III. Summary of Recommended Payment Following Judgment
A lump sum payment of $110,000.00, representing compensation for actual and projected pain
and suffering related to the vaccine-related injury, payable to petitioner.
Respectfully submitted,
STUART F. DELERY
Assistant Attorney General
RUPA BHATTACHARYYA
Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
VINCENT J. MATANOSKI
Deputy Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
LINDA S. RENZI
Senior Trial Counsel
Torts Branch, Civil Division
1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future pain and
suffering.
3

Case 1:13-vv-00985-UNJ Document 27 Filed 09/04/14 Page 6 of 6
/s/ Claudia B. Gangi
CLAUDIA B. GANGI
Senior Trial Attorney
Torts Branch, Civil Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 146
Benjamin Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
Tel.: (202) 616-4138
Dated: August 12, 2014
4

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_13-vv-00985-1
Date issued/filed: 2014-09-12
Pages: 2
Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 08/22/2014) regarding 24 DECISION Fees Stipulation/Proffer Signed by Special Master Laura D Millman. (tlj) Copy to parties.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:13-vv-00985-UNJ Document 28 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 2
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 13-985V
Filed: August 22, 2014
Not for Publication
*************************************
CHING-PING CHIH, *
*
Petitioner, * Attorneys’ fees and costs decision based on
* stipulation of facts
v. *
*
SECRETARY OF HEALTH *
AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
*
Respondent. *
*
*************************************
F. John Caldwell, Jr., Sarasota, FL, for petitioner.
Claudia B. Gangi, Washington, DC, for respondent.
MILLMAN, Special Master
DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1
On August 21, 2014, the parties filed a stipulation of facts in which they agreed on an
appropriate amount for attorneys’ fees and costs in this case.
In accordance with the General Order #9 requirement, petitioner asserts that she did not
incur any costs in pursuit of her petition. Petitioner submitted her request for attorneys’ fees and
costs to respondent. During informal discussions, respondent raised objections to certain items in
petitioner’s application. Based on these objections, petitioner amends her application for
1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this
case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal
Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899,
2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made
available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is
privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly
unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and
move to redact such information prior to the document=s disclosure. If the special master, upon review,
agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall
redact such material from public access.

Case 1:13-vv-00985-UNJ Document 28 Filed 09/12/14 Page 2 of 2
attorneys’ fees and costs to $13,696.22. Respondent does not object to this amount. The
undersigned finds this amount to be reasonable. Accordingly, the court awards $13,696.22,
representing reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and costs. The award shall be in the form of a
check payable jointly to petitioner and Maglio, Christopher & Toale, P.A., in the amount of
$13,696.22.
In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the
court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 22, 2014 s/ Laura D. Millman
Laura D. Millman
Special Master
2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or
jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
2