Karen Schuler v. HHS - Influenza, Guillain-Barré syndrome and steroid myopathy (2014)

Filed 2014-06-24Decided 2014-10-10Vaccine Influenza
compensated$20,000

Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]

Karen Schuler filed a petition on June 24, 2014, alleging that an influenza vaccine administered on November 8, 2010, caused her to develop Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and steroid myopathy. The parties reached a tentative agreement, and a stipulation regarding compensation was filed on September 16, 2014.

Respondent denied that the vaccination caused the alleged injuries or that Ms. Schuler experienced residual effects for more than six months.

Nevertheless, the parties stipulated to an award of $20,000.00 for all damages available under the Vaccine Act. Special Master Thomas L.

Gowen approved the stipulation and ordered judgment to be entered accordingly. Separately, on June 24, 2014, the parties stipulated to an award of $15,250.00 for attorneys' fees and costs, which was also granted by Special Master Gowen.

The public decision does not describe the onset of symptoms, specific medical tests, treatments, or expert witnesses. Petitioner was represented by Paul R.

Brazil of Muller Brazil, LLP, and respondent was represented by Lindsay Corliss of the United States Department of Justice.

Theory of causation

Karen Schuler filed a petition alleging that an influenza vaccine administered on November 8, 2010, caused Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and steroid myopathy. The respondent denied that the vaccination caused the alleged injuries or that petitioner experienced residual effects for more than six months. The parties stipulated to an award of $20,000.00 for all damages. The public decision does not specify the theory of causation, the mechanism of injury, or name any medical experts. The Special Master, Thomas L. Gowen, approved the stipulation on October 10, 2014. Attorneys' fees and costs in the amount of $15,250.00 were also stipulated and approved by Special Master Gowen on July 16, 2014. Petitioner was represented by Paul R. Brazil of Muller Brazil, LLP, and respondent was represented by Lindsay Corliss.

Source PDFs 2 total · 2 downloaded