VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_13-vv-00524 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_13-vv-00524 Petitioner: SCOTT TESTA Filed: 2013-11-18 Decided: 2015-11-18 Vaccine: Vaccination date: Condition: Outcome: dismissed Award amount USD: AI-assisted case summary: Scott Testa filed a petition for vaccine injury compensation on November 18, 2013. The specific vaccine and alleged injury are not detailed in this order. On November 17, 2015, both parties filed a joint notice of voluntary dismissal, requesting that the dismissal be with prejudice. The Special Master issued an order on November 18, 2015, dismissing the case with prejudice, meaning it cannot be refiled. No judgment will be entered in this case. Theory of causation field: unclear Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_13-vv-00524-0 Date issued/filed: 2015-12-11 Pages: 1 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 11/18/2015) regarding 53 Order Concluding Proceedings ( Signed by Special Master Thomas L. Gowen.)(mpj) Copy to parties. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:13-vv-00524-UNJ Document 60 Filed 12/11/15 Page 1 of 1 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: November 18, 2015 * * * * * * * * * * SCOTT TESTA, * * * No. 13-524V Petitioner, * * v. * Special Master Gowen * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Vaccine Rule 21(a); Joint Stipulation of AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Dismissal; Voluntary Dismissal * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDING1 On November 17, 2015, the parties filed a joint notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a)(1)(B). The parties stipulate to voluntary dismissal of the above-captioned case, and request that the dismissal be with prejudice. Accordingly, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a), the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is hereby instructed that a judgment shall not enter in the instant case pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a). IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Thomas L. Gowen Thomas L. Gowen Special Master 1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case, the undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b).