M.S. v. HHS - DTaP, seizure disorder (2014)

Filed 2013-05-21Decided 2014-09-19Vaccine DTaP
dismissedcognitive/developmental

Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]

Christina and Greg Schniegenberg, as legal representatives of their minor child M.S., filed a petition on May 21, 2013, alleging that the DTaP vaccine caused M.S. to develop generalized tonic seizures and a seizure disorder. The petition was filed under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act.

Petitioners submitted medical records. Initially, they expressed an intent to amend their petition to add a Table encephalopathy claim, but later declined to do so.

Respondent's Rule 4 report noted that M.S. had an SCN1A gene mutation. During a status conference, Special Master Christian J.

Moran informed the petitioners that recent Federal Circuit decisions concerning SCN1A gene mutations might undermine their case. Petitioners subsequently moved for the court to rule on the record, without citing specific evidence to support their claim.

Respondent did not file a written response. Special Master Moran noted that to receive compensation, petitioners must prove either a Table Injury or that the vaccine actually caused the injury.

The public decision does not describe the onset of symptoms, specific medical tests performed, or treatments received. The public decision does not name the petitioner's counsel or respondent's counsel.

The court found no evidence of a Table Injury and no medical opinion supporting the claim that the vaccine actually caused the seizure disorder. Because the medical records did not support the claim and no competent medical opinion was offered, the court dismissed the case for insufficient proof.

The Clerk was ordered to enter judgment accordingly.

Theory of causation

Petitioners Christina and Greg Schniegenberg, as legal representatives of minor M.S., filed a petition on May 21, 2013, alleging that the DTaP vaccine caused generalized tonic seizures and a seizure disorder. The public decision does not specify the vaccine date or M.S.'s age at vaccination. Petitioners did not pursue a Table Injury claim and instead pursued a causation-in-fact claim. Respondent's Rule 4 report noted an SCN1A gene mutation in M.S. Petitioners did not offer a competent medical opinion to support their claim that the vaccine actually caused the injury, and the medical records did not support the claim. Special Master Christian J. Moran dismissed the case for insufficient proof, citing the lack of evidence for a Table Injury and the absence of a medical opinion supporting actual causation. The public decision does not detail the alleged mechanism of injury or name any medical experts.

Source PDFs 1 total · 1 downloaded