Maryann Giordano v. HHS - MMR, multiple sclerosis, and/or transverse myelitis, and/or a significant aggravation of her previously diagnosed undifferentiated connective tissue disease (2019)

Filed 2013-04-23Decided 2019-06-24Vaccine MMR
compensated$80,000

Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]

Maryann Giordano filed a petition on April 23, 2013, alleging that she developed multiple sclerosis (MS), and/or transverse myelitis (TM), and/or a significant aggravation of her previously diagnosed undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD) after receiving measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) and hepatitis B (HepB) vaccinations on April 29, 2010. The respondent denied that the petitioner's alleged conditions or any other injury was caused or significantly aggravated by the vaccines.

The parties subsequently agreed to settle the case through a joint stipulation filed on May 28, 2019. Special Master Mindy Michaels Roth reviewed the stipulation, found it reasonable, and adopted it as the decision of the Court.

As part of the settlement, the respondent agreed to issue a lump sum payment of $80,000.00, payable to Maryann Giordano, representing compensation for all damages available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). The public decision does not describe the petitioner's counsel, respondent's counsel, the specific onset of symptoms, medical history prior to vaccination, diagnostic tests, treatments, or any expert witnesses.

The decision is designated as unpublished but will be posted on the Court of Federal Claims' website.

Theory of causation

Petitioner Maryann Giordano alleged that the MMR and hepatitis B vaccinations received on April 29, 2010, caused or significantly aggravated multiple sclerosis (MS), transverse myelitis (TM), and/or undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD). Respondent denied causation. The parties reached a joint stipulation on May 28, 2019, to settle the case. Special Master Mindy Michaels Roth adopted the stipulation. The settlement awarded a lump sum of $80,000.00 to the petitioner. The public text does not specify the mechanism of injury, expert testimony, or detailed medical evidence supporting the petitioner's claim or the respondent's denial. Attorneys for the petitioner were Michael London, Esq., and Douglas & London, P.C. Attorney for the respondent was Debra Begley, Esq. The decision date was June 24, 2019.

Source PDFs 2 total · 1 downloaded