VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_12-vv-00714
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_12-vv-00714
Petitioner: Nathan Tate
Filed: 2012-10-19
Decided: 2014-06-10
Vaccine: influenza
Vaccination date: 2010-11-02
Condition: Guillain-Barre syndrome and small fiber neuropathy
Outcome: compensated
Award amount USD: 320000

AI-assisted case summary:
Nathan Tate filed a petition on October 19, 2012, alleging that an influenza (flu) vaccination he received on November 2, 2010 caused him to develop Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) and small fiber neuropathy. Respondent denied that the influenza vaccination caused petitioner's GBS, small fiber neuropathy, or any other injury.

Nonetheless, both parties agreed in a stipulation filed May 16, 2014 to settle the case. Special Master Hamilton-Fieldman found the stipulation reasonable and adopted it as the decision of the Court. Petitioner received a lump sum of $320,000.00, representing compensation for all damages available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

The parties also stipulated to attorneys' fees and costs. Special Master Hamilton-Fieldman awarded $18,634.47 payable jointly to petitioner and his counsel Andrew Downing and Rhodes, Hieronymus, Tucker, Jones & Gable, PLLC, and $10,690.00 payable jointly to petitioner and Andrew Downing and Hennelly & Steadman, PLC, for a total of $29,324.47 in attorneys' fees and costs under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e).

Theory of causation field:
Flu Nov 2, 2010 → GBS + small fiber neuropathy. Stipulation May 16, 2014; SM Hamilton-Fieldman. $320,000. Fees $29,324.47 ($18,634.47 Rhodes firm + $10,690 Hennelly & Steadman) (Downing, Phoenix AZ).

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_12-vv-00714-0
Date issued/filed: 2014-06-10
Pages: 8
Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 05/19/2014) regarding 41 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer Signed by Special Master Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman. (dlb) Copy to parties.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:12-vv-00714-UNJ Document 45 Filed 06/10/14 Page 1 of 8
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 12-714V
(E-Filed: May 19, 2014)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
NATHAN TATE, * UNPUBLISHED
*
Petitioner, * Special Master
* Hamilton-Fieldman
v. *
* Influenza Vaccination;
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND * Guillain-Barre Syndrome; Small Fiber
HUMAN SERVICES, * Neuropathy; Decision; Stipulation.
*
Respondent. *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Andrew Downing, Hennelly & Steadman, P.C., Phoenix, AZ, for Petitioner.
Justine Daigneault, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES AND ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1
On October 19, 2012, Petitioner, Nathan Tate, filed a petition seeking
compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (Athe Vaccine
Program@). Petitioner alleged that he suffered Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) and small
fiber neuropathy, as a result of receiving an influenza vaccination received on November
2, 2010.2
1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in
this case, the undersigned intends to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal
Claims’ website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205,
116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). As provided by
Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any
information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in
substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Otherwise, “the
entire” decision will be available to the public. Id.
2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the
National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as
amended, 42 U.S.C.A. ' 300aa-10-' 300aa-34 (West 1991 & Supp. 2002) (Vaccine Act or the
1

Case 1:12-vv-00714-UNJ Document 45 Filed 06/10/14 Page 2 of 8
Respondent denies that Petitioner’s influenza vaccination caused his GBS and
small fiber neuropathy, and/or any other injury. Nonetheless, both parties, while
maintaining their above stated positions, agreed in a Stipulation, filed May 16, 2014,
(“Stipulation”) that the issues before them can be settled and that a decision should be
entered awarding Petitioner compensation.
The undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of
the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.
The stipulation awards:
A lump sum of $320,000.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This
amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under
42 U.S.C. §300aa-15(a) to which Petitioner would be entitled; and
Stipulation ¶ 8(a).
The parties further stipulated that they had reached the following agreement with
respect to attorneys’ fees and costs:
A lump sum of $18, 634.47, in the form of a check payable to Petitioner and
Petitioner’s attorney, Andrew Downing, Esq.,and Rhodes, Hieronymus, Tucker,
Jones, and & Gable, PLLC, for attorneys’ fees and costs.
Stipulation ¶8(b).
A lump sum of $10,690.00, in the form of a check payable to Petitioner and
Petitioner’s counsel, Andrew Downing, Esq., and Hennelly and Steadman, PLC,
for attorneys’ fees and costs under 42 U.S.C. §300aa-15 (e). In accordance with
General Order No. 9, Petitioner represents that he incurred no out-of-pocket
expenses in proceeding on the petition.
Stipulation ¶8(c).
Act). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. '
300aa.
2

Case 1:12-vv-00714-UNJ Document 45 Filed 06/10/14 Page 3 of 8
The undersigned approves the requested amounts for Petitioner’s compensation.
In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
the court is directed to enter judgment herewith.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Lisa D. Hamilton-Fieldman
Lisa D. Hamilton-Fieldman
Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties= joint
filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.
3

Case 1:12-vv-00714-UNJ Document 45 Filed 06/10/14 Page 4 of 8

Case 1:12-vv-00714-UNJ Document 45 Filed 06/10/14 Page 5 of 8

Case 1:12-vv-00714-UNJ Document 45 Filed 06/10/14 Page 6 of 8

Case 1:12-vv-00714-UNJ Document 45 Filed 06/10/14 Page 7 of 8

Case 1:12-vv-00714-UNJ Document 45 Filed 06/10/14 Page 8 of 8