VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_12-vv-00565 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_12-vv-00565 Petitioner: Walter Cairnes Filed: 2012-09-04 Decided: 2015-03-24 Vaccine: influenza Vaccination date: 2011-08-31 Condition: brachial neuritis Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 40000 AI-assisted case summary: Walter Cairnes filed a petition on September 4, 2012, alleging that trivalent influenza (flu) and tetanus (TDaP) vaccinations he received on August 31, 2011 caused him to suffer shoulder and cardiac injuries. Respondent's Rule 4(c) Report, filed February 11, 2013, conceded that the vaccinations caused brachial neuritis but denied that his cardiac injury was vaccine-related. Mr. Cairnes died on September 21, 2013, from cardiac arrhythmia and cardiomegaly. His spouse, Mandy G. Cairnes, was appointed personal representative of his estate and substituted as petitioner. On November 24, 2014, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation. Special Master Millman found the proffer reasonable and awarded a lump sum of $40,000.00, representing compensation for the conceded brachial neuritis injury under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). On March 3, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation of attorneys' fees and costs. Special Master Millman awarded $24,402.00 payable jointly to petitioner and Maglio, Christopher & Toale, P.A., plus $341.50 in petitioner's personal costs, for a total of $24,743.50. Theory of causation field: Flu + TDaP Aug 31, 2011 → brachial neuritis (conceded by respondent Feb 2013) + cardiac injury (denied). Walter Cairnes died Sep 21, 2013 (cardiac arrhythmia + cardiomegaly); Mandy Cairnes substituted as rep. Proffer Nov 24, 2014; SM Millman. $40,000 (brachial neuritis only). Fees $24,743.50 (Toale, Maglio Christopher & Toale, Sarasota FL). Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_12-vv-00565-0 Date issued/filed: 2014-12-16 Pages: 5 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 11/25/2014) regarding 43 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer Signed by Special Master Laura D Millman. (tlj) Copy to parties. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:12-vv-00565-UNJ Document 48 Filed 12/16/14 Page 1 of 5 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 12-565V Filed: November 25, 2014 Not for Publication ************************************* MANDY G. CAIRNES, as Personal * Representative of the Estate of * WALTER CAIRNES, Deceased, * * Petitioner, * * Damages decision based on proffer; v. * influenza (flu) vaccine; tetanus * (Tdap) vaccine; brachial neuritis; SECRETARY OF HEALTH * cardiac injury; death AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * ************************************* Anne C. Toale, Sarasota, FL, for petitioner. Michael P. Milmoe, Washington, DC, for respondent. MILLMAN, Special Master DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 On September 4, 2012, Walter Cairnes filed a petition under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10–34 (2006), alleging that he suffered shoulder and cardiac injuries as a result of the trivalent influenza (“flu”) and tetanus (“Tdap”) vaccinations he received on August 31, 2011. 1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master's action in this case, the special master intends to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims's website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact such information prior to the document=s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall redact such material from public access. 1 Case 1:12-vv-00565-UNJ Document 48 Filed 12/16/14 Page 2 of 5 On February 11, 2013, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) Report, conceding that petitioner was entitled to vaccine compensation for his brachial neuritis but denying that his cardiac injury was vaccine-related. Mr. Cairnes died on September 21, 2013, from cardiac arrhythmia and cardiomegaly. Med. recs. Ex. 15, at 1. Mandy G. Cairnes, his spouse, was appointed personal representative of his estate and substituted as petitioner in this action. On November 24, 2014, respondent filed Respondent’s Proffer on Award of Compensation. The undersigned finds the terms of the proffer to be reasonable. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to the award as stated in the proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached proffer, the court awards a lump sum payment of $40,000.00, representing compensation for the conceded injury of brachial neuritis. This amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). The award shall be in the form of a check for $40,000.00 made payable to petitioner, Mandy G. Cairnes. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 25, 2014 /s/ Laura D. Millman Laura D. Millman Special Master 2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:12-vv-00565-UNJ Document 48 Filed 12/16/14 Page 3 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ____________________________________ ) MANDY G. CAIRNES, as Personal ) Representative of the Estate of ) WALTER CAIRNES, deceased, ) ) Petitioner, ) No. 12-565V ) Special Master Millman v. ) ECF ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ) RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION I. Compensation for Vaccine Injury-Related Items Respondent filed a Rule 4(c) Report on February 11, 2013, conceding that Walter Lewis Cairnes was entitled to vaccine compensation for his brachial neuritis.1 However, the Rule 4(c) Report denied that his cardiac injury was vaccine-related. Respondent proffers that, based on the evidence of record, petitioner should be awarded $40,000.00 for the conceded injury of brachial neuritis, and that petitioner is not entitled to any vaccine compensation for his cardiac injury. This amount of $40,000.00 represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(1); 15(a)(3)(A); and 15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees. 1 Mr. Cairnes died on September 21, 2013, and on February 20, 2014, the State of South Carolina, County of Lancaster, appointed Mandy G. Cairnes, his spouse, as Personal Representative of the petitioner’s estate. Case 1:12-vv-00565-UNJ Document 48 Filed 12/16/14 Page 4 of 5 II. Form of the Award The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment as described below, and request that the special master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following: A. A lump sum payment of $40,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Mandy G. Cairnes. This amount accounts for all elements of compensation under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) to which petitioner would be entitled. Petitioner represents that she is, or within 90 days of the date of judgment will become, duly authorized to serve as the legal representative of Walter Lewis Cairnes’ estate under the laws of the State of South Carolina. No payment pursuant to this Stipulation shall be made until petitioner provides the Secretary with documentation establishing her appointment as legal representative of Walter Lewis Cairnes’ estate. If petitioner is not authorized by a court of competent jurisdiction to serve as legal representative of the estate of Walter Lewis Cairnes at the time payment pursuant to this Stipulation is to be made, any such payment shall be paid to the party or parties appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction to serve as legal representative of the estate of Walter Lewis Cairnes upon submission of written documentation of such appointment to the Secretary. Respectfully submitted, JOYCE R. BRANDA Acting Assistant Attorney General RUPA BHATTACHARYYA Director Torts Branch, Civil Division VINCENT J. MATANOSKI Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division Case 1:12-vv-00565-UNJ Document 48 Filed 12/16/14 Page 5 of 5 GLENN A. MACLEOD Senior Trial Counsel Torts Branch, Civil Division /s/ Michael P. Milmoe MICHAEL P. MILMOE Senior Trial Counsel Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Phone: (202) 616-4125 Dated: November 24, 2014 Fax: (202) 616-4310 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_12-vv-00565-1 Date issued/filed: 2015-03-24 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 03/03/2015) regarding 50 DECISION Fees Stipulation/Proffer Signed by Special Master Laura D Millman. (tlj) Copy to parties. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:12-vv-00565-UNJ Document 53 Filed 03/24/15 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 12-565V Filed: March 3, 2015 Not for Publication ************************************* MANDY G. CAIRNES, * as Personal Representative of the Estate of * WALTER CAIRNES, Deceased, * * Petitioner, * Attorneys’ fees and costs decision based on * stipulation of fact v. * * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * ************************************* Anne C. Toale, Sarasota, FL, for petitioner. Michael P. Milmoe, Washington, DC, for respondent. MILLMAN, Special Master DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1 On March 3, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation of fact in which they agreed on an appropriate amount for attorneys’ fees and costs in this case. Petitioner submitted a draft application for attorneys’ fees and costs to respondent. During informal discussions, respondent raised objections to certain items in petitioner’s 1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact such information prior to the document=s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall redact such material from public access. Case 1:12-vv-00565-UNJ Document 53 Filed 03/24/15 Page 2 of 2 application. Based on these objections, petitioner amends her application for attorneys’ fees and costs to $24,743.50, consisting of $24,402.00 in attorneys’ fees and costs and $341.50 in petitioner’s costs. Respondent does not object to this amount. The undersigned finds this amount to be reasonable. Accordingly, the court awards: a. $24,402.00, representing reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and costs. The award shall be in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner and Maglio, Christopher & Toale, P.A. for $24,402.00; and b. $341.50, representing reimbursement for petitioner’s costs. The award shall be in the form of a check payable to petitioner for $341.50. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 3, 2015 s/ Laura D. Millman Laura D. Millman Special Master 2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2