D.L. v. HHS - Rotavirus, Kawasaki’s Disease (2014)

Filed 2014-07-11Decided 2014-08-04Vaccine Rotavirus
dismissed

Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]

Percell Livingston, father and natural guardian of D.L., a minor, filed a petition on July 11, 2014, seeking compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. The petition alleged that the RotaTeq vaccine administered to D.L. on March 10, 2011, caused the child to develop Kawasaki's Disease.

After gathering medical records and receiving the respondent's Rule 4(c) report, the petitioner filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the petition on July 10, 2014. The petitioner stated that an investigation of the facts and science supporting the claim demonstrated an inability to prove entitlement to compensation.

To receive compensation, the petitioner would need to prove either that D.L. suffered a "Table Injury" as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table or that the vaccine actually caused the injury. The record did not contain evidence of a "Table Injury." Furthermore, the record lacked a medical expert's opinion or any other persuasive evidence indicating that D.L.'s alleged injury was vaccine-caused.

The decision noted that a petitioner cannot be awarded compensation based solely on assertions and that the petition lacked sufficient supporting evidence. Consequently, Special Master Brian H.

Corcoran dismissed the case for insufficient proof of causation. The Clerk was ordered to enter judgment accordingly.

Clifford J. Shoemaker represented the petitioner, and Traci R.

Patton represented the respondent.

Theory of causation

Petitioner Percell Livingston, on behalf of minor D.L., alleged that the RotaTeq vaccine administered on March 10, 2011, caused Kawasaki's Disease. The petition was filed on July 11, 2014. Petitioner later filed a motion to dismiss, stating an inability to prove entitlement to compensation. The public decision does not describe a specific theory of causation, nor does it mention a "Table Injury." The record lacked a medical expert's opinion or other persuasive evidence of vaccine causation. The case was dismissed for insufficient proof of causation by Special Master Brian H. Corcoran on August 4, 2014. Petitioner's counsel was Clifford J. Shoemaker, and respondent's counsel was Traci R. Patton.

Source PDFs 2 total · 1 downloaded