VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_10-vv-00498
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_10-vv-00498
Petitioner: Rose Scott
Filed: 2015-01-13
Decided: 2015-06-19
Vaccine: influenza
Vaccination date: 2007-11-19
Condition: Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)
Outcome: compensated
Award amount USD: 340238

AI-assisted case summary:
Rose Scott filed a petition for vaccine compensation on January 13, 2015, alleging that she suffered from Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) as a result of receiving an influenza vaccine on November 19, 2007. The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, denied that the vaccine caused her alleged injury. Despite maintaining their positions, both parties agreed to settle the case. A stipulation was filed on January 8, 2015, outlining the terms of the settlement. The court adopted this stipulation as its decision, awarding Rose Scott a lump sum of $287,500.00 for all remaining damages. Subsequently, on May 29, 2015, the parties filed another joint stipulation regarding attorney's fees and costs. They agreed that Petitioner's counsel should receive $52,738.60. The Special Master approved this amount as reasonable and directed that judgment be entered accordingly. The total compensation awarded to Rose Scott was $340,238.60, covering both damages and attorney's fees and costs.

Theory of causation field:
Table

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_10-vv-00498-0
Date issued/filed: 2015-02-10
Pages: 7
Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 01/13/2015) regarding 50 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer Signed by Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (ag) Copy to parties.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:10-vv-00498-UNJ Document 54 Filed 02/10/15 Page 1 of 7
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 10-498V
(Not to be published)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
*
ROSE SCOTT , * Filed: January 13, 2015
*
Petitioner, *
* Decision by Stipulation; Damages;
v. * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine;
* Guillain-Barrè Syndrome (“GBS”)
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND *
HUMAN SERVICES, *
*
Respondent. *
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Isaiah Kalinowski, Maglio Christopher and Toale, PA, Washington, DC, for Petitioner.
Ann Martin, U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
On August 2, 2010, Rose Scott filed a petition seeking compensation under the National
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 Petitioner alleges that as a result of receiving the
influenza (“flu”) vaccine on November 19, 2007, she suffered from Guillain-Barrè syndrome
(“GBS”), and that she experienced the effects of this injury for more than six months.
Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused Petitioner’s alleged GBS or any other
injury. Nonetheless both parties, while maintaining their above-stated positions, agreed in a
1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for my action in this case, it will be posted on the website of
the United States Court of Federal Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347,
§ 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). As provided by 42 U.S.C. §
300aa-12(d)(4)(B), however, the parties may object to the inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information. To
do so, Vaccine Rule 18(b) provides that each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any
information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is
privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute
a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the decision will be available to the
public. Id.
2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program comprises Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury
Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755 (codified as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. ' 300aa-10 – 34 (2006))
[hereinafter “Vaccine Act” or “the Act”]. Individual sections references hereafter will be to ' 300aa of the Act.

Case 1:10-vv-00498-UNJ Document 54 Filed 02/10/15 Page 2 of 7
stipulation (filed January 8, 2015) that the issues before them can be settled, and that a decision
should be entered awarding Petitioner compensation.
I have reviewed the file, and based upon that review, I conclude that the parties’
stipulation (as attached hereto) is reasonable. I therefore adopt it as my decision in awarding
damages on the terms set forth therein.
The stipulation awards:
 A lump sum of $287,500.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner.
Stipulation ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all remaining damages that would be
available under 42 U.S.C. ' 300aa-15(a).
I approve a Vaccine Program award in the requested amounts set forth above to be made
to Petitioner. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the
clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment herewith.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Brian H. Corcoran
Brian H. Corcoran
Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by each filing (either jointly or
separately) a notice renouncing their right to seek review.
2

Case 1:10-vv-00498-UNJ Document 54 Filed 02/10/15 Page 3 of 7
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
____________________________________
)
ROSE SCOTT, )
)
Petitioner, )
) No. 10-498V
v. ) Special Master Corcoran
) ECF
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND )
HUMAN SERVICES, )
)
Respondent. )
____________________________________)
STIPULATION
The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:
1. Rose Scott, petitioner, filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (the “Vaccine Program”).
The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner’s receipt of an
influenza vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”),
42 C.F.R. § 100.3 (a).
2. Petitioner received her influenza immunization on November 19, 2007.
3. The vaccination was administered within the United States.
4. Petitioner alleges that she suffered Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”) as a result of
receiving the influenza vaccine.
5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action
for damages on her behalf as a result of her condition.
6. Respondent denies that the influenza vaccine caused petitioner to suffer from GBS or
any other injury.

Case 1:10-vv-00498-UNJ Document 54 Filed 02/10/15 Page 4 of 7
7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the
issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the
compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.
8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with
the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue
the following vaccine compensation payment:
A lump sum of $287,500.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This
amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42
U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).
9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after
petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings
before the special master to award reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in proceeding
upon this petition.
10. Petitioner and her attorney represent that compensation to be provided pursuant to
this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable
under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can reasonably be
expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance policies, Federal or
State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
§1396 et seq.)), or by entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis.
11. Payment made pursuant to paragraph 8 of this Stipulation and any amounts awarded
pursuant to paragraph 9 of this Stipulation will be made in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
15(i), subject to the availability of sufficient statutory funds.
2

Case 1:10-vv-00498-UNJ Document 54 Filed 02/10/15 Page 5 of 7
12. The parties and their attorneys further agree and stipulate that, except for any award
for attorneys’ fees and litigation costs, and past unreimbursed expenses, the money provided
pursuant to this Stipulation will be used solely for the benefit of petitioner as contemplated by a
strict construction of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) and (d), and subject to the conditions of 42 U.S.C.
§300aa-15(g) and (h).
13. In return for the payments described in paragraphs 8 and 9, petitioner, in her
individual capacity, and on behalf of her heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns,
does forever irrevocably and unconditionally release, acquit and discharge the United States and
the Secretary of Health and Human Services from any and all actions or causes of action
(including agreements, judgments, claims, damages, loss of services, expenses and all demands
of whatever kind or nature) that have been brought, could have been brought, or could be timely
brought in the Court of Federal Claims, under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation
Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 et seq., on account of, or in any way growing out of, any and all
known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected personal injuries to or death of petitioner resulting
from, or alleged to have resulted from, the influenza vaccination administered on November 19,
2007, as alleged by petitioner in a petition for vaccine compensation filed on or about August 2,
2010, in the United States Court of Federal Claims as petition No. 10-498V.
14. If petitioner should die prior to entry of judgment, this agreement shall be voidable
upon proper notice to the Court on behalf of either or both of the parties.
15. If the special master fails to issue a decision in complete conformity with the terms
of this Stipulation or if the Court of Federal Claims fails to enter judgment in conformity with a
decision that is in complete conformity with the terms of this Stipulation, then the parties’
settlement and this Stipulation shall be voidable at the sole discretion of either party.
3

Case 1:10-vv-00498-UNJ Document 54 Filed 02/10/15 Page 6 of 7
16. This Stipulation expresses a full and complete negotiated settlement of liability and
damages claimed under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, as amended, except
as otherwise noted in paragraph 9 above. There is absolutely no agreement on the part of the
parties hereto to make any payment or to do any act or thing other than is herein expressly stated
and clearly agreed to. The parties further agree and understand that the award described in this
Stipulation may reflect a compromise of the parties’ respective positions as to liability and/or
amount of damages, and further, that a change in the nature of the injury or condition or in the
items of compensation sought, is not grounds to modify or revise this agreement.
17. This Stipulation shall not be construed as an admission by the United States or the
Secretary of Health and Human Services that the influenza vaccine caused petitioner to develop
GBS or any other injury.
18. All rights and obligations of petitioner hereunder shall apply equally to petitioner’s
heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and/or assigns.
END OF STIPULATION
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
4

Case 1:10-vv-00498-UNJ Document 54 Filed 02/10/15 Page 7 of 7

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_10-vv-00498-1
Date issued/filed: 2015-06-19
Pages: 2
Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 5/29/2015) regarding 56 DECISION Fees Stipulation. Signed by Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (ag) Copy to parties.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:10-vv-00498-UNJ Document 59 Filed 06/19/15 Page 1 of 2
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 10-498V
(Not to be published)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
*
ROSE SCOTT, *
* Filed: May 29, 2015
Petitioner, *
* Decision by Stipulation; Attorney’s
v. * Fees & Costs
*
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND *
HUMAN SERVICES, *
*
Respondent. *
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Isaiah Richard Kalinowski, Washington, DC, for Petitioner
Ann Donohue Martin, Washington, DC, for Respondent
ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS DECISION1
On August 2, 2010, Rose Scott filed a petition seeking compensation under the National
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (Athe Vaccine Program@). On January 9, 2015, the parties
filed a stipulation detailing an amount to be awarded to Petitioner. I subsequently issued a
decision finding the parties’ stipulation to be reasonable and granting Petitioner the award
outlined by the stipulation.
On May 29, 2015, counsel for both parties filed another joint stipulation, this time in
regards to attorney’s fees and costs. The parties have stipulated that Petitioner’s counsel should
receive a lump sum of $52,738.60, in the form of a check payable to Petitioner and Petitioner’s
1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for my action in this case, I will post this decision on the
United States Court of Federal Claims’ website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No.
107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). As provided by 42
U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B), however, the parties may object to the posted decision’s inclusion of certain kinds of
confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request
redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in
substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole decision will
be available to the public. (Id.)

Case 1:10-vv-00498-UNJ Document 59 Filed 06/19/15 Page 2 of 2
counsel. This amount represents a sum to which Respondent does not object. In addition, and in
compliance with General Order No. 9, Petitioner has represented that she did incur any
reimbursable costs in proceeding on this petition.
I approve the requested amount for attorney’s fees and costs as reasonable. Accordingly,
an award should be made in the form of a check in the amount of $52,738.60 payable jointly to
Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel, Isaiah Richard Kalinowski, Esq, and forwarded to the main
office of Maglio, Christopher & Toale, located at 1605 Main Street, Suite 710, Sarasota, Florida
34236. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’
stipulation.2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Brian H. Corcoran
Brian H. Corcoran
Special Master
2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice renouncing their
right to seek review.