{"package_id":"USCOURTS-cofc-1_06-vv-00371","decision_granule_id":"USCOURTS-cofc-1_06-vv-00371-3","petitioner_identifier":"J.H.","is_minor":1,"age_at_vaccination":0.75,"age_unit_raw":"years","vaccine_type":"influenza (two half-doses, pediatric formulation)","vaccination_date":"2004-10-14","condition_raw":"neurological degeneration, loss of motor skills and body control","condition_category":"developmental_delay_regression","autism_spectrum_adjacent":1,"outcome":"denied","award_amount_usd":null,"decision_date":"2014-08-26","extraction_version":"gemini-v2","extracted_at":"2026-04-30T00:28:42.726785+00:00","number_of_concurrent_vaccines":1,"dose_number":null,"time_to_onset_days":null,"theory_of_causation":"Petitioners alleged that two half-doses of influenza vaccine administered on October 14, 2004, and November 16, 2004, caused J.H.'s severe neurological degeneration through a \"challenge-rechallenge\" mechanism and immune dysfunction, supported by expert Dr. James M. Oleske. Respondent's expert, Dr. Stephen J. McGeady, argued that J.H.'s symptoms began prior to the first vaccination between July and October 2004, and that the vaccine could not cause such an injury. Special Master George L. Hastings, Jr. denied entitlement, finding that J.H.'s condition predated the vaccinations, thus failing the \"proximate temporal relationship\" prong of the Althen test, and that the medical theories presented were unpersuasive. The Court of Federal Claims affirmed, and the Federal Circuit and Supreme Court denied further review. Attorneys' fees were awarded for the entitlement phase and the Federal Circuit appeal, totaling $190,630.50.","is_death":0,"date_of_death":null,"petition_filed_date":"2006-05-08","case_summary":"On May 8, 2006, Francia and Peter Hirmiz filed a petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act on behalf of their daughter, J.H., alleging that two half-doses of influenza vaccine administered on October 14 and November 16, 2004, caused her neurological degeneration. J.H. was born on January 12, 2004. Initially, she developed normally, meeting milestones at her six-month check-up on July 16, 2004. However, by her nine-month visit on October 14, 2004, she had lost skills, including the ability to roll over and sit alone, and exhibited decreased muscle tone. She received the first half-dose of the influenza vaccine on this date. A second half-dose was administered on November 16, 2004, after which she was referred to a neurologist. By January 18, 2005, her 12-month visit, she had further lost motor skills and experienced weight percentile collapse. Extensive evaluations by multiple specialists at various institutions, including the Mayo Clinic, did not yield a definitive diagnosis for her condition, which was described over time as spastic diplegia, cerebral palsy, and spastic quadriplegia with global developmental delays. Petitioners amended their petition to focus solely on the influenza vaccines, alleging a \"challenge-rechallenge\" pattern and immune dysfunction as the causation theory, supported by their expert, Dr. James M. Oleske. Respondent's expert, Dr. Stephen J. McGeady, contended that J.H.'s neurological deterioration began before the first influenza vaccination, between July and October 2004, based on the loss of skills documented between the July and October pediatric visits. Dr. McGeady also disputed the challenge-rechallenge theory and immune dysfunction claims, stating that the medical literature did not support influenza vaccine causing such severe neurological degeneration and that J.H.'s lymphocyte abnormality likely reflected a coincident infection. Special Master Abell, in a prior onset hearing, found that J.H.'s symptoms began between July 16 and October 14, 2004, prior to the first influenza vaccination, giving precedence to contemporaneous medical records over parental testimony where discrepancies existed. Special Master George L. Hastings, Jr., subsequently denied entitlement, finding Dr. Oleske unpersuasive because his opinion was based on a flawed premise of post-vaccination onset, and that the challenge-rechallenge and immune dysfunction theories were unsupported. He concluded that petitioners failed all three prongs of the Althen test for causation-in-fact: no medical theory showing influenza vaccine can cause this injury, no logical sequence of cause and effect, and no proximate temporal relationship due to pre-vaccination onset. The Court of Federal Claims, Judge Charles F. Lettow presiding, affirmed the denial, rejecting petitioners' theories and denying a motion to amend the petition to include a significant-aggravation claim. The Federal Circuit affirmed without opinion under Rule 36, and the Supreme Court denied certiorari. Special Master Hastings awarded $121,906 in fees and $991 in costs for the entitlement phase. Judge Lettow later awarded an additional $67,733.50 for the Federal Circuit appeal, reversing the denial of those fees, but affirmed the denial of fees for further appellate proceedings, resulting in a total award of $190,630.50.","is_minor_inferred":1,"is_pediatric_broad":1,"special_master":"George L. Hastings Jr.","petitioner_identifier_original":null,"caption_petitioner_name":null,"petitioner_attorney_name":"John F. McHugh","petitioner_attorney_firm":"Law Office of John McHugh","petitioner_attorney_location":"New York, NY","adjudicator_name":null,"caption_people_backfilled_at":null,"attorney_canonical_keys":"|john-mchugh|","firm_canonical_key":"law-office-of-john-mchugh","package_title":"HIRMIZ et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES","canonical_url":"https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_06-vv-00371","plain_text_url":"https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_06-vv-00371.txt","json_url":"https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_06-vv-00371.json","source_documents":[{"granule_id":"USCOURTS-cofc-1_06-vv-00371-0","title":"HIRMIZ et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES","docket_text":"PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 08/26/2014) regarding 119 DECISION of Special Master Signed by Special Master George L. Hastings. (dlb) Copy to parties.","date_issued":"2014-09-17","pdf_url":"https://api.govinfo.gov/packages/USCOURTS-cofc-1_06-vv-00371/granules/USCOURTS-cofc-1_06-vv-00371-0/pdf","pdf_bytes":414373,"triage_decision":"keep","triage_reason":"docketText matches keep keyword 'decision of special master'","download_status":"ok","registry_pdf_url":"https://vicp-registry.org/pdf/USCOURTS-cofc-1_06-vv-00371/USCOURTS-cofc-1_06-vv-00371-0"},{"granule_id":"USCOURTS-cofc-1_06-vv-00371-1","title":"HIRMIZ et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES","docket_text":"JUDGE VACCINE REISSUED REPORTED OPINION re: 127 Order on Motion for Review, Judge Vaccine Reported Opinion. Signed by Judge Charles F. Lettow. (gk)","date_issued":"2014-12-19","pdf_url":"https://api.govinfo.gov/packages/USCOURTS-cofc-1_06-vv-00371/granules/USCOURTS-cofc-1_06-vv-00371-1/pdf","pdf_bytes":372963,"triage_decision":"keep","triage_reason":"docketText matches keep keyword 'opinion'","download_status":"ok","registry_pdf_url":"https://vicp-registry.org/pdf/USCOURTS-cofc-1_06-vv-00371/USCOURTS-cofc-1_06-vv-00371-1"},{"granule_id":"USCOURTS-cofc-1_06-vv-00371-2","title":"HIRMIZ et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES","docket_text":"PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 8/29/2017) regarding 135 DECISION of Special Master - Fees Signed by Special Master George L. Hastings. (bl) Copy to parties.","date_issued":"2017-09-27","pdf_url":null,"pdf_bytes":null,"triage_decision":"skip","triage_reason":"fees-only decision (attorney compensation)","download_status":"skipped"},{"granule_id":"USCOURTS-cofc-1_06-vv-00371-3","title":"HIRMIZ et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES","docket_text":"JUDGE VACCINE REISSUED REPORTED OPINION re: 144 Order on Motion for Review, Judge Vaccine Reported Opinion originally filed November 22, 2017. Signed by Judge Charles F. Lettow. (je)","date_issued":"2017-12-07","pdf_url":"https://api.govinfo.gov/packages/USCOURTS-cofc-1_06-vv-00371/granules/USCOURTS-cofc-1_06-vv-00371-3/pdf","pdf_bytes":291184,"triage_decision":"keep","triage_reason":"docketText matches keep keyword 'opinion'","download_status":"ok","registry_pdf_url":"https://vicp-registry.org/pdf/USCOURTS-cofc-1_06-vv-00371/USCOURTS-cofc-1_06-vv-00371-3"}]}